THE ARMEY CURVE IN BULGARIA (2000-18) – THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND EMPIRICAL RESULTS
Abstract
In this paper we provide a theoretical basis for the so-called” Armey curve,” the inverted U-shape relationship between the level of government purchases and GDP growth, named after Armey (1995). We use an otherwise standard Keynesian model, augmented with a quadratic relationship between investment and lagged government expenditure, which was documented empirically. This modelling approach is a useful shortcut that aims to capture the common link shared by both variables, namely their dependence on the real interest rate, as suggested also by the extended static IS-LM model. This resulting dynamic relationship is a newly documented stylized fact, at least in Bulgarian data for the period 2000-2018, and the source in the extended Keynesian model that generates an Armey curve for Bulgaria.
References
[2] Armey, R. 1995. The freedom revolution. Washington, DC: Rogney Publishing Co
[3] Arpaia, A. and Turrini. 2007. Government expenditure and economic growth in the EU: long-run tendencies and short-run adjustment. SSRN paper 2004461/ 2007. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2004461
[4] Barro, R.J. 1990. Government spending in a simple model of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98: 103-125. DOI: https://doi.org/doi:10.1086/261726
[5] Dar, A., and Amirkhalkhali, S. 2002. Government size, factor accumulation, and economic growth: evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 24: 679-692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-8938(02)00163-1
[6] Easterly, W. and Rebelo, S. 1993. Fiscal policy and economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32: 417-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w4499
[7] Engen, E.M. and Skinner, J.S. 1992. Fiscal policy and economic growth. NBER Working Paper
[8] Folster, S. and Henrekson, M. 2001. Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries. European Economic Review, 45: 1501-1520. https://www.ifn.se/Wfiles/wp/wp503.pdf
[9] Gwartney, J., Holcombe, R., and Lawson, R. 1998. The Scope of Government and the Wealth of Nations. The Cato Journal, 18: 163-64. http://myweb.fsu.edu/jdgwartney/Documents/Gwartney%20Lawson%20Cato%201998%20paper.pdf
[10] Lin, S.A. 1994. Government spending and economic growth. Applied Economics, 26: 83-94.
[11] Sattar, Z. 1993. Public expenditure and economic performance: A comparison of developed and low-income developing countries. Journal of International Development, 5: 27-49.
[12] Sheehey, E.J. 1993. The Effect of government size on economic growth. Eastern Economic Journal, 321-328. https://web.holycross.edu/RePEc/eej/Archive/Volume19/V19N3P321_328.pdf
[13] Vasilev, A. 2015b. Modeling Real Private Consumption Expenditure in Bulgaria after the Currency Board Implementation (1997-2005). Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, 18: 81-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zireb-2015-0005
[14] Vasilev, A. 2015a. Welfare effects of flat income tax reform: the case of Bulgaria. Eastern European Economics, 53: 205-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2015.1033364
[15] Wagner, A. 1883. Finanzwissenschaft, Leipzig.
[16] National Statistical Institute. Aggregate Statistical Indicators. Available on-line at www.nsi.bg.
Non-Exclusive License under Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC BY 4.0):
This ‘Article’ is distributed under the terms of the license CC-BY 4.0., which lets others distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon this article, even commercially, as long as they credit this article for the original creation. ASERS Publishing will be acknowledged as the first publisher of the Article and a link to the appropriate bibliographic citation (authors, article title, volume issue, page numbers, DOI, and the link to the Published Article on ASERS Publishing’ Platform) must be maintained.