SUNK COSTS OF CONSUMER SEARCH: ECONOMIC RATIONALITY OF SATISFICING DECISION
Abstract
The paper argues that sunk costs’ sensitivity can lead to the optimal consumption-leisure choice underprice dispersion. The increase in quantity to be purchased with the extension of the time horizon of the consumption-leisure choice equalizes marginal costs of search with its marginal benefits. The implicit optimal choice results in the explicit satisficing decision. The transformation of cognitive mechanism of discouragement into satisficing happens only in the “common model” of consumer behavior. The paper argues that the cognitive mechanism of aspiration takes place when consumers try to get marginal savings on purchase greater than the wage rate and, therefore, they follow the “leisure model” of behavior where both the marginal utility of labor income and the marginal utility of consumption become negative.
References
[2] Arkes, H.A., Blumer, C. 1985. The Psychology of Sunk Costs, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 35: 124-140.
[3] H.Garland, H., Newport, S. 1991. Effects of Absolute and Relative Sunk Costs on the Decision to Persist with a Course of Action, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 48: 55-69.
[4] Kapteyn A., Wansbeek, T., Buyze, J. 1979. Maximizing or Satisficing, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(4): 549-563.
[5] Kogut, C.A. 1990. Consumer search behavior and sunk costs, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(14): 381-392.
[6] Malakhov, S. 2003. Transaction Costs, Economic Growth, and Labor Supply. (in Russian) Moscow: Voprosy Economiki,9: 49-61.
[7] Malakhov, S. 2011. Optimal Consumer Choices under Conditions of Sequential Search. (in Russian) Moscow, Economic Policy, 6 (6): 148 - 168. (English version is availaible as “Optimal Sequential Search and Optimal Consumption-Leisure Choice” at: http://works.bepress.com/sergey_malakhov.
[8] Malakhov, S. 2012. Satisficing Decision Procedure and Optimal Consumption-Leisure Choice, http://works.bepress.com/sergey_malakhov.
[9] Malakhov, S. 2013a. Money Flexibility and Optimal Consumption-Leisure Choice, Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields, Volume IV, 1(8):77-88.
[10] Malakhov, S. 2013b. A note on the synthesis of the satisficing concept and the neoclassical theory, (in Russian). Odessa: Economics II: 86-105. http://economics-journal.org/files/archive/Economics-2013-2.pdf
[11] McAfee, P.R., Mialon, H.M., Mialon, S.H. 2010. Do Sunk Costs Matter?, Economic Inquiry, 48 (2): 323–336.
[12] Ratchford, B.N. 2009. Consumer Search Behavior and Its Effects on Markets. Boston: Now Publishers.
[13] Simon H. 1967. Motivational and emotional controls of cognition, Psychological Review, 74 (1): 29–39.
[14] Shanin, T. Chayanov message: illuminations, miscomprehensions, and the contemporary “development theory”’, Introduction for: A.V. Chayanov, The Theory of Peasant Economy, The University of Wisconsin Press 1986.
[15] Stiglitz J.E. 1979. Equilibrium in Product Markets with Imperfect Information. American Economic Review, 69(2): 339-345.
[16] Thaler, R. 1980. Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 1: 39-60.
Non-Exclusive License under Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC BY 4.0):
This ‘Article’ is distributed under the terms of the license CC-BY 4.0., which lets others distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon this article, even commercially, as long as they credit this article for the original creation. ASERS Publishing will be acknowledged as the first publisher of the Article and a link to the appropriate bibliographic citation (authors, article title, volume issue, page numbers, DOI, and the link to the Published Article on ASERS Publishing’ Platform) must be maintained.