The Environmental CSR Awareness-Satisfaction Paradox: Understanding Customer Perceptions and Behavioural Intentions in Hospitality Services

Abstract

This study explores a paradoxical relationship between environmental CSR awareness and customer satisfaction within the Malaysian hospitality sector. The research uncovers how high CSR awareness can negatively influence satisfaction while positively impacting behavioural intentions.


Data was collected via survey from 400 hospitality customers and analyzed using Random Forest, K-means clustering, and regression models to examine the relationships between environmental CSR awareness, customer satisfaction, and behavioural intentions.


The analysis reveals that increased environmental CSR awareness correlates negatively with customer satisfaction but positively with behavioural intentions like willingness to pay more. Four distinct customer segments emerged, showing varying perceptions and satisfaction patterns.


This paper challenges the conventional belief that CSR always enhances satisfaction, offering empirical evidence of the Environmental CSR Awareness-Satisfaction Paradox. The study provides a new lens to understand complex customer psychology in sustainable hospitality.


The findings are limited to the hospitality industry in Malaysia and may not generalize across regions or sectors.


Understanding this paradox helps hospitality businesses better strategize CSR communication and customer engagement.


Insights contribute to policymaking and service design promoting sustainable consumer behaviour.

References

[1] Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2): 179-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
[2] Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons.
[3] Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organisational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4): 39-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
[4] Chen, M.-F., & Tung, P.-J. (2014). Developing an extended Theory of Planned Behaviour model to predict consumers' intention to visit green hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36: 221–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.09.006
[5] Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3): 55–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299205600304
[6] Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6): 874–900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
[7] Dung Minh Nguyen & Yen Ting Helena Chiu (2023). Corporate social responsibility authenticity as an antecedent to customer citizenship behaviour: Evidence from the hospitality industry in Taiwan. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 32(4): 477–504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2023.2188510
[8] Font, X., & Lynes, J. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in tourism and hospitality. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(7): 1027–1042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1488856
[9] Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
[10] Kang, K. H., Lee, S., & Huh, C. (2012). Positive and negative corporate social responsibility activities impact company performance in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(1): 329–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.05.006
[11] Kim, S. B., Kim, D. Y., & Bolls, P. (2017). Customer response to environmental corporate social responsibility: A study of the relationship between customer satisfaction and purchase intention. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142: 3020-3029.
[12] Lenzen, M., Sun, Y. Y., Faturay, F., Ting, Y. P., Geschke, A., & Malik, A. (2018). The carbon footprint of global tourism. Nature Climate Change, 8(6): 522-528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0141-x
[13] Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4): 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.001
[14] Manaktola, K., & Jauhari, V. (2007). Exploring consumer attitudes and behaviour towards green practices in the lodging industry in India. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 19(5): 364-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110710757534
[15] Martínez García de Leaniz, P., Herrero Crespo, Á., & Gómez López, R. (2018). Customer responses to environmentally certified hotels: The moderating effect of environmental consciousness on forming behavioural intentions. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(7): 1160-1177. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1349775
[16] Martínez, P., Herrero, Á., & García de Leaniz, P. M. (2019). Corporate images and customer behavioural intentions in an environmentally certified context: Promoting environmental sustainability in the hospitality industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6): 1382-1391. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1754
[17] Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4): 460–469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405
[18] Rahman, I., Reynolds, D., & Svaren, S. (2015). How "green" are North American hotels? An exploration of low-cost adoption practices. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33: 720–731. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.09.008
[19] Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuram, A. (1996). The behavioural consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2): 31–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000203
Published
2025-08-29
How to Cite
AHMAD, Huzaifa. The Environmental CSR Awareness-Satisfaction Paradox: Understanding Customer Perceptions and Behavioural Intentions in Hospitality Services. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 16, n. 3, p. 218 - 226, aug. 2025. ISSN 2068-7729. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/9061>. Date accessed: 07 sep. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v16.3(79).03.