Environmental Management and Power Generation in Czech Republic

Abstract


Purpose: This article emphasizes the urgent claim for a sustainable approach embedded in the efforts of economic theory for spurring long run growth. The recent approach in the field of economic modelling and climate change estimates the impacts of unfettered economic activity on the atmosphere and on the climate. In such terms, this article presents the most relevant findings linking sustainability and economic growth in order to encompass the current situation of the Czech power generation sector.


Methodology: A descriptive narrative intended to unfold the main theoretical developments of economic theory and climate change based on the contribution of the 2018 Nobel Prize Nordhaus and the main results of the climate change modelling. There, the emphasis marks the interaction between technological change and the preservation of natural resources, encompassed in an international effort for engaging the main contaminant countries in an effort of abatement. This theoretical bedrock provides us with the set of criteria to assess the method and the technology for generating power in the Czech Republic in a sustainable way.


Findings: The blatant threat coming from global warming and climate change requires the involvement of the most contaminant countries. The article demonstrates that a game based on non-cooperative rules is not an incentive for complying the environmental goals. With no effective sanctions for the contaminant countries there is no incentive to comply with the rules. From the point of the economic theory, the first step for punishing the carbon emissions and contamination is the assignment of an economic value to the emissions, and to the extent that it makes up a negative externality, the contaminant agent must pay a cost due to an unsustainable production process and technology.


Originality: The new sectorial and macroeconomic approaches involve the participation of private sector, the government and supranational spheres for ruling and implementing sustainable production practices and goals. Europe has been an example of concern for the definition of ambitious environmental goals, and the Czech Republic echoes the collective guidelines intended to make the economy more environmentally friendly.


 

References

[1] Arrow, K. (2006). Global Climate Change: A Challenge to Policy. In Joseph E. Stiglitz, Aaron S. Edlin and J. Bradford DeLong (Eds.) Economists’ Voice. Columbia University Press.
[2] Farideh Ghanavati, João C.O. Matias and Gerardo J. Osório. (2024) Towards sustainable smart cities: Integration of home energy management system for efficient energy utilization. Sustainable Cities and Society, 111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105579.
[3] Howard, P.H., Sterner, T. (2017). Few and Not So Far Between: A Meta-analysis of Climate Damage Estimates. Environ Resource Econ, 68: 197–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0166-z
[4] Hugues, C. (2024). Climate change and biodiversity loss: new territories for financial authorities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 68:101449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2024.101449
[5] Jinqi L., Wang, J. and Cardinal, J. (2022). Evolution and reform of UK electricity market. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112317
[6] Lemoine, D. and Rudik, I. (2017). Managing Climate Change under Uncertainty: Recursive Integrated Assessment at an Inflection Point. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 9: 117-142. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053516
[7] Matyášek, J. and Suk, M. (2009). Antropogeneze v geologii. Available at: https://is.muni.cz/elportal/estud/pedf/js10/antropog/web/index.html.
[8] Nakamya, M. (2022). How sustainable are biofuels in a natural resource-dependent economy? Energy for Sustainable Development, 66: 296-307.
[9] Nordhaus, W. (1992). An Optimal Transition Path for Controlling Greenhouse Gases. Science, 258 (5086): 1315–1319.
[10] Nordhaus, W. (2015). Climate Clubs: Overcoming Free-riding in International Climate Policy. American Economic Review, 105(4): 1339–1370. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.15000001
[11] Nordhaus, W. (2017). Revisiting the Social Cost of Carbon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(7):1518–1523.
[12] Nordhaus, W. (2018a). Climate Change: The Ultimate Challenge for Economics. Nobel Prize lecture. Stockholm.
[13] Nordhaus, W. (2018b). Projections and Uncertainties about Climate Change in an Era of Minimal Climate Policies. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 10(3): 333–360. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20170046
[14] Pienkowski, D. (2024). Is nuclear energy really sustainable? A critical analysis on the example of the Polish energy transition plan. Energy for Sustainable Development, 78:101376.
[15] Rattle, I., Gailani, A. and Taylor, P. G. (2024). Decarbonisation strategies in industry: going beyond clusters. Sustainability Science, 19: 105–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01313-4
[16] Sankaran, K. (2023). Turning black to green: Circular economy of industrial carbon emissions. Energy for Sustainable Development, 74: 463-470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2023.05.003
[17] Schelling, T. C. (2007). Climate Change: The Uncertainties, the Certainties, and What They Imply About Action. In Joseph E. Stiglitz, Aaron S. Edlin and J. Bradford DeLong (Eds.) Economists’ Voice. Columbia University Press.
[18] Stern, N. and Stiglitz, J. (2023). Climate change and growth. Industrial and Corporate Change, 00: 1-27.
[19] Stiglitz, J. (2006). A New Agenda for Global Warming. In Joseph E. Stiglitz, Aaron S. Edlin and J. Bradford DeLong (Eds.) Economists’ Voice. Columbia University Press.
[20] Terneus P., et al. (2022). Estimation of energy consumption due to the elimination of an environmental tax in Ecuador. Energy for Sustainable Development, 66: 2-100.
[21] Tol, R. S. J. (2009). The Economic Effects of Climate Change. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(2).
[22] Ye, Q., Jiaqi, L. and Tianle, L. (2024). Measuring energy transition away from fossil fuels: A new index. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 200: 114546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114546
[23] BP. (2023). “Statistical Review of World Energy”. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html
[24] ČEZ. (2021). “Skupina ČEZ. Obnovitelné zdroje” https://www.cez.cz/cs/o-cez/vyrobni-zdroje/obnovitelne-zdroje.
[25] Energetický regulační úřad (ERÚ). (2023). “Annual Reports and Energy Statistics”. https://www.eru.cz/en/
[26] Eurostat. (2023). “Energy Statistics”. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/energy/data
[27] Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, Germany. (2023). “Energy Data”. https://www.bmwi.de/Navigation/EN/Home/home.html
[28] International Energy Agency. (2023). “Data and Statistics”. https://www.iea.org/statistics/
[29] Ministry for the Ecological Transition, France. (2023). “Energy Statistics”. https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/
[30] Ministry of Trade and Industry. (2021). “Zpracovatelský průmysl DN” https://www.mpo.cz/assets/dokumenty/26188/26053/291112/priloha023.pdf.
[31] OTE. (2021). “Modernizační fond” https://www.mzp.cz/C1257458002F0DC7/cz/modernizacni_fond/$F ILE/OPTNE-PDMdF-20210125.pdf.
[32] World Bank. (2023). “Energy Use (Fossil Fuels)”. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.USE.COMM.FO.ZS
Published
2025-02-28
How to Cite
ANTOŠOVÁ, Gabriela. Environmental Management and Power Generation in Czech Republic. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 16, n. 1, p. 21 - 32, feb. 2025. ISSN 2068-7729. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/8746>. Date accessed: 28 mar. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v16.1(77).02.