Consumers’ Intention to Use Renewable Energy Based on the Behavioral Reasoning Theory

  • Tessy Fitriyani GOBEL Management Department, BINUS Business School Master Program, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Medya RAMADHAN Management Department, BINUS Business School Master Program, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Iden Aksana Putra PRATAMA Management Department, BINUS Business School Master Program, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Evelyn HENDRIANA Management Program, BINUS Business School Doctor of Research in Management, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia


Public concerns about climate change and environmental protection have triggered governments and corporations to do research on clean and cost-effective forms of energy. Green energy is relatively new in developing countries, which results in limited market penetration and low consumer acceptance. This study aims to investigate the relationship between global motives and consumer intentions to use renewable energy via the Behavioral Reasoning Theory (BRT). In this research, reasons for supporting the utilization of renewable energy are shown through environmental concerns and perceived benefits, while reasons against it are represented through perceived costs. An online survey obtained 275 valid data responses from Indonesian middle- and upper-class consumers. This data was analyzed using PLS-SEM to maximize the model's predictive value. All hypotheses tested, except for the effect of environmental concern and perceived cost on attitude, were proven to influence customer intentions to use renewable energy. This study found that perceived benefits gave the largest contribution to global motives for using renewable energy. Since this study involved consumers from the middle to upper class in developing countries, perceived behavioral control had the most influence on intention to use renewable energy compared to attitude and subjective norms.



[1] Abdullah, W. Muhammad Zainuddin B. Wan, Wan Nur Rahini Aznie Bt Zainudin, Waznatol Widad Bt Mohamad Ishak, Farizah Bt Sulong, and Hafiz Muhammad Zia Ul Haq. 2020. Public Participation of Renewable Energy (PPRED) Model in Malaysia: An Instrument Development. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development 10(1): 119–137. DOI:
[2] Abrahamse, W., and Steg, L. 2011. Factors related to household energy use and intention to reduce it: The role of psychological and socio-demographic variables. Human Ecology Review, 18(1): 30–40.
[3] Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. DOI:
[4] Ajzen, I. 2001. Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1): 27-58.
[5] Alam, S. S., Hashim, N. H. N., Rashid, M., Omar, N. A., Ahsan, N., and Ismail, M. D. 2014. Small-scale households’ renewable energy usage intention: Theoretical development and empirical settings. Renewable Energy, 68: 255-263. DOI:
[6] Almrafee, M., and Akaileh, M. 2023. Customers' purchase intention of renewable energy in Jordan: the case of solar panel systems using an extended theory of planned behavior (TPB). International Journal of Energy Sector Management. Ahead-of-print. DOI:
[7] Alrashoud, K., and Tokimatsu, K. 2020. An exploratory study of the public’s views on residential solar photovoltaic systems in oil-rich Saudi Arabia. Environmental Development, 35:100526. DOI:
[8] Ari, E., and Yilmaz, V. 2021. The effect of environmental concern on renewable energy awareness, perceived benefit and intention to use. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 13(2): 995-1013. DOI:
[9] Ashinze, P. C., Tian, J., Ashinze, P. C., Nazir, M., and Shaheen, I. 2021. A multidimensional model of sustainable renewable energy linking purchase intentions, attitude, and user behavior in Nigeria. Sustainability, 13(19): 10576. DOI:
[10] Bandara, U. C., and Amarasena, T. S. M. 2020. Impact of perceived ease of use, awareness, and perceived cost on intention to use solar energy technology in Sri Lanka. Journal of International Business and Management, 3(4): 01-13. DOI:
[11] Basit, M. A., Dilshad, S., Badar, R., and Sami ur Rehman, S. M. 2020. Limitations, challenges, and solution approaches in grid‐connected renewable energy systems. International Journal of Energy Research, 44(6), 4132-4162. DOI:
[12] Bozorgparvar, E., Yazdanpanah, M., Forouzani, M., and Khosravipour, B. 2018. Cleaner and greener livestock production: Appraising producers’ perceptions regarding renewable energy in Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203: 769-776. DOI:
[13] Cantarero, M. M. V. 2020. Of renewable energy, energy democracy, and sustainable development: A roadmap to accelerate the energy transition in developing countries. Energy Research and Social Science, 70: 101716. DOI:
[14] Chandon, P., Morwitz, V. G., and Reinartz, W. J. 2005. Do intentions really predict behavior? Self-generated validity effects in survey research. Journal of Marketing, 69(2): 1–14. DOI:
[15] Chen, Y., Wang, Z., and Zhong, Z. 2019. CO2 emissions, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy production, and foreign trade in China. Renewable Energy, 131: 208-216. DOI:
[16] Chow, W. S., and Chan, L. S. 2008. Social network, social trust, and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information and Management, 45(7): 458-465. DOI:
[17] Chowdhury, M. N. M., Uddin, S., and Saleh, S. 2014. Present scenario of renewable and non-renewable resources in Bangladesh: A compact analysis. International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy, 3(6): 164-178.
[18] Claudy, M. C., Peterson, M., and O’Driscoll, A. 2013. Understanding the attitude-behavior gap for renewable energy systems using behavioral reasoning theory. Journal of Macromarketing, 33(4): 273-287. DOI:https://doi:10.1177/0276146713481605
[19] De Medeiros, J. F., Ribeiro, J. L. D., and Cortimiglia, M. N. 2016. Influence of perceived value on purchasing decisions of green products in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 110: 158-169. DOI:
[20] Fatima, N., Li, Y., Li, X., Abbas, W., Jabeen, G., Zahra, T., and Yasir, A. 2022. Households’ perception and environmentally friendly technology adoption: Implications for energy efficiency. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10: 176-187. DOI:
[21] Fornara, F., Pattitoni, P., Mura, M., and Strazzera, E. 2016. Predicting intention to improve household energy efficiency: The role of value-belief-norm theory, normative and informational influence, and specific attitude. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45: 1-10. DOI:
[22] Gârdan, I. P., Micu, A., Paștiu, C. A., Micu, A. E., and Gârdan, D. A. 2023. Consumers’ attitude towards renewable energy in the context of the energy crisis. Energies, 16(2): 1-31. DOI:
[23] Guo, J., Zhou, Y., Ali, S., Shahzad, U., and Cui, L. 2021. Exploring the role of green innovation and investment in energy for environmental quality: An empirical appraisal from provincial data of China. Journal of Environmental Management, 292: 112779. DOI:
[24] Guney, I., and Onat, N. 2008. Technological status and market trends of photovoltaic cell industry. WSEAS Transactions on Electronics, 5(7): 303-312.
[25] Ha, H. Y., and Janda, S. 2012. Predicting consumer intentions to purchase energy‐efficient products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(7): 461-469. DOI:
[26] Hansla, A., Gamble, A., Juliusson, A., and Gärling, T. 2008. Psychological determinants of attitude towards and willingness to pay for green electricity. Energy Policy, 36(2): 768-774. DOI:
[27] Hojnik, J., Ruzzier, M., Fabri, S., and Klopčič, A. L. 2021. What you give is what you get: Willingness to pay for green energy. Renewable Energy, 174: 733-746. DOI:
[28] Huang, Z. F., Pan, L., Zou, J. J., Zhang, X., and Wang, L. 2014. Nanostructured bismuth vanadate-based materials for solar-energy-driven water oxidation: A review on recent progress. Nanoscale, 6(23): 14044-14063.
[29] Huijts, N. M., Molin, E. J., and Steg, L. 2012. Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 525-531. DOI:
[30] Irfan, M., Zhao, Z.-Y., Ahmad, M., and Mukeshimana, M. 2019. Solar energy development in Pakistan: Barriers and policy recommendations. Sustainability, 11(4): 1206. DOI:
[31] Irfan, M., Zhao, Z. Y., Li, H., and Rehman, A. 2020. The influence of consumers’ intention factors on willingness to pay for renewable energy: A structural equation modeling approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(17): 21747-21761. DOI:
[32] Irfan, M., Hao, Y., Ikram, M., Wu, H., Akram, R., and Rauf, A. 2021. Assessment of the public acceptance and utilization of renewable energy in Pakistan. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27: 312-324. DOI:
[33] Jabeen, G., Yan, Q., Ahmad, M., Fatima, N., and Qamar, S. 2019. Consumers’ intention-based influence factors of renewable power generation technology utilization: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237: 117737. DOI:
[34] Jayaraman, K., Paramasivan, L., and Kiumarsi, S. 2017. Reasons for low penetration on the purchase of photovoltaic (PV) panel system among Malaysian landed property owners. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80: 562-571. DOI:
[35] Kaufmann, H. R., Panni, M. F. A. K., and Orphanidou, Y. 2012. Factors affecting consumers’ green purchasing behavior: An integrated conceptual framework. Amfiteatru Economic Journal, 14(31): 50-69.
[36] Kaygusuz, K. 2012. Energy for sustainable development: A case of developing countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(2): 1116-1126. DOI:
[37] Khan, M., Lee, H. Y., and Bae, J. H. 2019. The role of transparency in humanitarian logistics. Sustainability, 11(7): 2078. DOI:
[38] Kumar, G., and Nayak, J.K. 2023. A meta-analysis of TPB model in predicting green energy behavior: The moderating role of cross-cultural factors. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 35(2): 147-165. DOI:
[39] Kumar, V., Syan, A. S., and Kaur, K. 2020. A structural equation modeling analysis of factors driving customer purchase intention towards solar water heater. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 11(1): 65-78. DOI:
[40] Lin, B., and Zhu, J. 2019. The role of renewable energy technological innovation on climate change: Empirical evidence from China. Science of the Total Environment, 659: 1505-1512.
[41] Liqun, L., and Zhixin, W. 2009. A variable voltage MPPT control method for photovoltaic generation system. WSEAS Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 8(4): 335-349.
[42] Liu, W., Wang, C., and Mol, A. P. 2013. Rural public acceptance of renewable energy deployment: The case of Shandong in China. Applied Energy, 102: 1187-1196.
[43] Masrahi, A., Wang, J. H., and Abudiyah, A. K. 2021. Factors influencing consumers’ behavioral intentions to use renewable energy in the United States residential sector. Energy Reports, 7: 7333-7344. DOI:
[44] Masukujjaman, M., Alam, S. S., Siwar, C., and Halim, S. A. 2021. Purchase intention of renewable energy technology in rural areas in Bangladesh: Empirical evidence. Renewable Energy, 170: 639-651. DOI:
[45] Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J. H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., and Cham, T. H. 2020. Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2): 1-20.
[46] Milfont, T. L., and Duckitt, J. 2010. The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1): 80-94. DOI:
[47] Nazir, M., and Tian, J. 2022. The influence of consumers’ purchase intention factors on willingness to pay for renewable energy: Mediating effect of attitude. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10: 62-74. DOI:
[48] Park, E. 2019. Social acceptance of green electricity: Evidence from the structural equation modeling method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215: 796-805. DOI:
[49] Rezaei, R., and Ghofranfarid, M. 2018. Rural households’ renewable energy usage intention in Iran: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Renewable Energy, 122: 382-391. DOI:
[50] Saari, U. A., Damberg, S., Frömbling, L., and Ringle, C. M. 2021. Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention. Ecological Economics, 189: 107155. DOI:
[51] Schulte, E., Scheller, F., Sloot, D., and Bruckner, T. 2022. A meta-analysis of residential PV adoption: The important role of perceived benefits, intentions, and antecedents in solar energy acceptance. Energy Research and Social Science, 84: 102339. DOI:
[52] Sharifuddin, S. I., Zainudin, N., and Sabr, M. F. 2022. An extended model of the theory of planned behavior to predict households’ response to net energy metering program in urban Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(1): 1864-1879. DOI:
[53] Tan, H., Jain, A., Voznyy, O., Lan, X., García de Arquer, F. P., Fan, J. Z., and Sargent, E. H. 2017. Efficient and stable solution-processed planar perovskite solar cells via contact passivation. Science, 355(6326): 722-726. DOI:
[54] Vantamay, N. 2018. Investigation and recommendations on the promotion of sustainable consumption behavior among young consumers in Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(1): 51-58. DOI:
[55] Wall, W. P., Khalid, B., Urbański, M., and Kot, M. 2021. Factors influencing consumer’s adoption of renewable energy. Energies, 14(17): 5420. DOI:
[56] Wang, Q., Wang, S., Zhang, M., Bu, Z., and Liu, J. 2021. Green public procurement as a promoter for green consumption: From the perspective of individual’s knowledge. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 3: 100035. DOI:
[57] Wei, J., Zhao, X., and Yang, X. 2021. Measuring purchase intention towards green power certificate in a developing nation: Applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Resources, Conservation, and Recycling, 168: 105363. DOI:
[58] Westaby, J. D. 2005. Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98(2): 97-120. DOI:
[59] Wunder, S., Engel, S., and Pagiola, S. 2008. Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics, 65(4): 834-852. DOI:
[60] Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., and Bürer, M. J. 2007. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35(5): 2683-2691. DOI:
[61] Yadav, R., and Pathak, G. S. 2017. Determinants of consumers’ green purchase behavior in a developing nation: Applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Ecological Economics, 134: 114-122. DOI:
[62] Yadav, S. K., and Bajpai, U. 2020. Energy, economic and environmental performance of a solar rooftop photovoltaic system in India. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 39(1): 51-66. DOI:
[63] Yue, B., Sheng, G., She, S., and Xu, J. 2020. Impact of consumer environmental responsibility on green consumption behavior in China: The role of environmental concern and price sensitivity. Sustainability, 12(5): 2074. DOI:
[64] Zainudin, N., Siwar, C., Choy, E. A., and Chamhuri, N. 2014. Evaluating the role of energy efficiency label on consumers’ purchasing behaviour. Apcbee Procedia, 10: 326-330. DOI:
[65] Zervas, E., Vatikiotis, L., Gareiou, Z., Manika, S., and Herrero-Martin, R. 2021. Assessment of the Greek national plan of energy and climate change: Critical remarks. Sustainability, 13(23): 13143. DOI:
[66] Zografakis, N., Sifaki, E., Pagalou, M., Nikitaki, G., Psarakis, V., and Tsagarakis, K. P. 2010. Assessment of public acceptance and willingness to pay for renewable energy sources in Crete. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(3): 1088-1095. DOI:
How to Cite
GOBEL, Tessy Fitriyani et al. Consumers’ Intention to Use Renewable Energy Based on the Behavioral Reasoning Theory. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 15, n. 1, p. 5 - 18, feb. 2024. ISSN 2068-7729. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 20 apr. 2024. doi: