Exploring Ecological Justice in the Regulatory Framework of Land Ownership, Utilization, Control, and Inventory in Indonesia

Abstract

The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of environmental justice elements in land inventory, tenure, ownership, use and use (IP4T) management, as described in TAP MPR IX/2001 and Government Regulation No. 16. 2004 on land administration. This study uses a standard legal research method integrating both a legal and conceptual approach. The author's study indicates that environmental justice is included in the IP4T law, as stated in TAP MPR IX/2001, as well as in Government Law No. 16 on Spatial Planning. According to Article 23 of Government Regulation No. 16/2004, IP4T maps must be taken into account for all spatial and regional planning. These maps contain more than just information on land ownership, use, and use. In addition, the IP4T dataset includes assessments of land capacity and valuation, so environmental dimensions associated with land are examined. The definition of environmental justice can be derived from Section 3, Section 5 and Section 6, Paragraph (2) of TAP MPR IX/2001. However, in practice, many inconsistencies remain and undermine basic principles of environmental justice. These irregularities are particularly widespread in the context of the implementation of IP4T (Integration Policy for Transition) within the mining industry.

References

[1] Alting, H. 2011. Penguasaan tanah masyarakat hukum adat (suatu kajian terhadap masyarakat hukum adat ternate). Journal of Dinamika Hukum, 11(1). DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.1.75 (in Indonesian)
[2] Atmanto, P. D. 2022. The Role of Ecological Justice on the Buffer Zone Management in Indonesia: Mediating Role of Satisfied and Motivated People, Croatian International Relation Review, December 31. Available at: https://cirrj.org/menuscript/index.php/cirrj/article/view/631
[3] Bakri, M. 1970. Unifikasi dalam pluralisme hukum tanah di indonesia (rekonstruksi konsep unifikasi dalam uupa). Kertha Patrika, January. DOI:10.24843/kp.2008.v33.i01.p07 (in Indonesian)
[4] Baxter, J. and Greenlaw, K. 2005. Explaining Perceptions of a Technological Environmental Hazard Using Comparative Analysis. Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien, 49(1): 61–80. DOI:10.1111/j.0008-3658.2005.00080.x
[5] Betsill, M. M., Hochstetler, K. and Stevis D. 2014. Advances in International Environmental Politics, Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. DOI:10.1057/9781137338976
[6] Chamdani, M. C. 2021. Masa Depan Penyelesaian Penguasaan Tanah Di Dalam Kawasan Hutan Pasca-Pengaturan Kembali Luas Kawasan Hutan Yang Harus Dipertahankan Dalam UU Cipta Kerja, Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, 7(2): 221–53. DOI:10.38011/jhli.v7i2.292 (in Indonesian)
[7] Earlene, F., and Benny, D. 2023. Implikasi Kebijakan Reforma Agraria Terhadap Ketidaksetaraan Kepemilikan Tanah Melalui Lensa Hak Asasi Manusia, Tunas Agraria, 6(2): 152–70. DOI:10.31292/jta.v6i2.223 (in Indonesian)
[8] Ginting, D. 2011. Reformasi hukum tanah dalam rangka perlindungan hak atas tanah perorangan dan penanam modal dalam bidang agrobisnis. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 18(1): 63–82. DOI:10.20885/iustum.vol18.iss1.art4 (in Indonesian)
[9] Handoko, W. 2019. Analisis Pengembangan Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Pertanahan Bpn/Kementerian Agraria RI. Recital Review, 1(2): 23–43. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/RR/article/download/7446/9686
[10] Helmi, H. H. 2019. Reformasi hukum pertanahan: pengaturan komersialisasi ruang tanah. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 8(3): 381. DOI:10.33331/rechtsvinding.v8i3.354 (in Indonesian)
[11] Ismail, I., Abdurrahman A., M. Jafar, and Azhari A. 2010. Desentralisasi kewenangan bidang pertanahan berdasarkan undang-undang nomor 11 tahun 2006. Jurnal Media Hukum, 17(1). DOI:10.18196/jmh.v17i1.367 (in Indonesian)
[12] Ismail, N. et al. 2012. Penjabaran Asas-Asas Pembaharuan Agraria Berdasarkan Tap MPR No. IX/MPR/2001 Dalam Perundang-Undangan Di Bidang Pertanahan, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 22(2): 360. DOI:10.22146/jmh.16231 (in Indonesian)
[13] Karjoko, L., et al. 2022. Indonesia’s Sustainable Development Goals Resolving Waste Problem: Informal to Formal Policy, International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(2). 10.18280/ijsdp.170230
[14] Karjoko, L., et al. 2022. Legal Policy of Old Wells Petroleum Mining Management Based on Social Justice in Realising Energy Sovereignty, Sriwijaya Law Review, 6(2): 286-303. DOI:10.28946/slrev.vol6.iss2.174
[15] Liliyani, P., Tanjung N., and Dwi Wulan Titik Andari 2020. Inventarisasi Penguasaan, Pemilikan, Penggunaan Dan Pemanfaatan Tanah (IP4T) Partisipatif Di Kabupaten Madiun, Tunas Agraria, 3(2): 157–76. DOI:10.31292/jta.v3i2.114 (in Indonesian)
[16] Mahfiana, L. 2016. Konsepsi Kepemilikan Dan Pemanfaatan Hak Atas Tanah Harta Bersama Antara Suami Istri. Buana Gender: Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Anak, 1(1): 29–44. DOI:10.22515/bg.v1i1.65 (in Indonesian)
[17] Minulyo, A. Joni. 2007. Asas Asas Hukum Pembaharuan Agraria. Neliti. https://www.neliti.com/publications/ 13102/asas-asas-hukum-pembaharuan-agraria#cite (in Indonesian)
[18] Nugroho, W. 2020. Persoalan Hukum Penyelesaian Hak Atas Tanah Dan Lingkungan Berdasarkan Perubahan Undang-Undang Minerba, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, September. DOI:10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss3.art7 (in Indonesian)
[19] Rejekiningsih, T. 2016. Asas fungsi sosial hak atas tanah pada negara hukum (suatu tinjauan dari teori, yuridis dan penerapannya di indonesia), Yustisia, 5(2). DOI:10.20961/yustisia.v5i2.8744 (in Indonesian)
[20] Suhattanto, M. A., Sarjita S., Sukayadi S., and Mujiburohman, D. A. 2021. Kualitas Data Pertanahan Menuju Pelayanan Sertifikat Tanah Elektronik. Widya Bhumi, 1(2): 100–114. DOI:10.31292/wb.v1i2.11
[21] Sukirno, S. 2016. Tindak lanjut pengakuan hutan adat setelah putusan mahkamah konstitusi no.35/puu-x/2012, Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45(4): 259. DOI:10.14710/mmh.45.4.2016.259-267 (in Indonesian)
[22] Sulaiman, K. F. 2021. Polemik Fungsi Sosial Tanah Dan Hak Menguasai Negara Pasca UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 Dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 50/PUU-X/2012, Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(1): 091–111. DOI:10.31078/jk1815 (in Indonesian)
[23] Suratma, A. G. P., and Azis A. 2017. Tanda tangan digital menggunakan qr code dengan metode advanced encryption standard, Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 18(1): 59–68. DOI:10.30595/techno.v18i1.1482 (in Indonesian)
[24] Swastika, I P. A. 2010. Rancang bangun sistem informasi geografis penguasaan pemilikan penggunaan dan pemanfaatan tanah (p4t) kabupaten jembrana berbasis web. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/lontar/article/view/3685 (in Indonesian)
[25] Yurista, A. P., Simarmata, R., Widowati, D. and Bosko, R. E. 2019. Hak penguasaan atas sumber daya alam dalam konsepsi dan penjabarannya dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16(2): 147–59. DOI:10.54629/jli.v16i2.454 (in Indonesian) 
Published
2023-12-08
How to Cite
BASUKI, Agung; KARJOKO, Lego; HANDAYANI, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rahmi. Exploring Ecological Justice in the Regulatory Framework of Land Ownership, Utilization, Control, and Inventory in Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 14, n. 7, p. 2944 - 2953, dec. 2023. ISSN 2068-7729. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/8245>. Date accessed: 17 june 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v14.7(71).11.