Climate Change Impacts and Environmental and Water use Behaviors, Beliefs and Perceptions

  • Ismail BANOO Department of Public Management and Economics, Durban University of Technology, South Africa
  • Nirmala DORASAMY Department of Public Management and Economics, Durban University of Technology, South Africa
  • Faizal BUX Department of Public Management and Economics, Durban University of Technology, South Africa


This paper presents research conducted on urban home water use behavior as a response demand mitigation strategy to reduce domestic water consumption in SA. The paper presents results of urban home residents’ attitudes, behavior and perceptions towards their water consumption in a search for ways in which domestic demand for water may be substantially reduced. The analysis reflects the water use behavior and perceptions of urban dwellers in a period where water use rationing and restrictions are in place in parts of SA, therefore water scarcity is an important public crisis issue.

The research has brought to the fore the complexity of the forces shaping water demand and use in the context of the socio-demographic composition of homes residing in different types of dwellings, as well as the cultural, behavioral and attitudinal aspects of water consumption in city of Durban. The essential questions driving the research was what extent the two key dimensions of urban structure do, i.e. built form and the socio-behavioral characteristics of home water use, influence the pattern of water consumption. Additionally, the study ascertained the extent to which urban water users understood water-saving practices and the need to conserve this precious natural resource whilst also investigating the extent that the public believed were the most effective water-saving habits, interventions and communication methods to support reduced water consumption at a home level. In so doing, the study findings have aimed to inform public policy on ways to reduce consumption and identify alternative and complimentary ways to address the urban water conservation and demand management planning.


[1] Beal, C.D., et al. 2011. Believed versus actual home water use: Disaggregating end uses to inform water conservation attitudes in Qld, Australia. Efficient 2011: The Sixth IWA specialist conference on efficient use and management of water and water demand management: Challenges & Opportunities, Jordan, March 29 - April 2, 2011. International Water Association. Available at:
[2] Beal, C.D., Stewart, R.A., and Fielding, K. 2013. A novel mixed method smart metering approach to reconciling differences between perceived and actual residential end use water consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 60: 116–128. DOI:
[3] Browne, A.L., Pullinger, M., Medd, W. and Anderson, B. 2014. Patterns of practice: A reflection on the development of quantitative/mixed methodologies capturing everyday life related to water consumption in the UK. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17 (1): 27–43. DOI:10.1080/13645579.2014.854012
[4] Dolnicar, S., Hurlimann, A. and Grün, B. 2011. What affects public acceptance of recycled and desalinated water? Water Resources, 45 (2): 933–943. DOI:
[5] Domènech, L. and Sauría, D. 2010. Socio-technical transitions in water scarcity contexts: Public acceptance of greywater reuse technologies in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55 (1): 53–62. DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.07.001
[6] Dos Santos, S., et al. 2017. Urban growth and water access in sub-Saharan Africa: Progress, challenges, and emerging research directions. Science of the Total Environment, 607-608: 497-508. DOI:
[7] Fan, L., Gai, L., Tong, Y. and Li, R. 2017. Urban water consumption and its influencing factors in China: Evidence from 286 cities. Journal of Cleaner Production. 166: 124-133. DOI:
[8] Gerakopoulou, P., and Makropoulos, C. 2013. A qualitative account of consumers’ cognitions on the potential use of smart metering and e-learning services regarding water consumption: A study of Athens. Athens, September International report. Project iWIDGET
[9] Gilg, A. and Barr, S. 2006. Analysis: Behavioral attitudes towards water saving? Evidence from a study of environmental actions. Ecological Economics, 57(3): 400–414. DOI: econ.2005.04.010
[10] Go, A., Moyer, J. D., Rafa, M., and Schuenemann, J. 2013. Population futures: Revisiting South Africa’s national development plan 2030. African Futures Paper, 7: 13. Available at: AF7_15Oct2013V2.pdf
[11] Gregory, G. and di Leo, M. 2003. Repeated behavior and environmental psychology: The role of personal involvement and habit formation in explaining water consumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(6): 1261–1296. DOI:
[12] Hedden, S. and Cilliers, J. 2014. Parched prospects: The emerging water crisis in South Africa. African Futures Paper, 11: 1-16. DOI:
[13] Hogg, M.A., and Vaughan, G.M. 2011. Social Psychology, 6th Ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall. ISBN: 978-0273741145
[14] Inglehart, R. 2008. Changing values among Western Publics from 1970 to 2006. West European Politics, 31 (1–2): 130–146. DOI:
[15] Jorgensen, B., Graymore, M. and O’Toole, K. 2009. Home water use behavior: An integrated model. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1): 227–236.1
[16] Kristin, F., et al. 2022. Habitual food, energy, and water consumption behaviors among adults in the United States: Comparing models of values, norms, and identity, Energy Research & Social Science, 85. DOI:
[17] Long, K., and Pijanowski, B.C. 2017. Is there a relationship between water scarcity and water use efficiency in China? A National Decadal assessment across spatial scales. Land Use Policy, 69: 502-511. DOI:
[18] Mata I.J. et al. 2018. Understanding residential water-use behavior in urban South Africa. The Sustainable Water Resource Handbook South Africa Volume 8. Available at:
[19] Mondejar-Jimenez, J. A., et al. 2011. Environmental behavior and water saving in Spanish housing. International Journal of Environmental Resources, 5(1): 1–10. Available at:
[20] Russell, S., and Fielding, K. 2010. Water demand management research: A psychological perspective. Water Resources Research, 46(5): 1–12. DOI:
[21] Sershen, S., et al. 2016. Water security in South Africa: Perceptions on public expectations and municipal obligations, governance and water re-use. Water SA, 42(3): 456-465. DOI:
[22] Smith, J.A. 2008. Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. London: Sage, ISBN: 1412930839, 978-1412930833, 276 pp.
[23] Troy, P., and Randolph, B. 2006. Water consumption and the built environment: A social and behavioral analysis. City Futures Research Centre, Research Paper No. 5, June 2006. Available at:
[24] Willis, R. M. et al. 2013. End use water consumption in homes: Impact of socio-demographic factors and efficient devices, Journal of Cleaner Production, 60: 107–115. DOI:
[25] Wisker, G. 2007. The postgraduate research handbook: Succeed with your MA, MPhil, EdD and PhD. 2nd Rev Ed Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN: 978-0230521308
[26] Wutich, A., et al. 2017. Advancing methods for research on home water insecurity: Studying entitlements and capabilities, socio-cultural dynamics, and political processes, institutions and governance. Water Security, 2: 1-10. DOI:
[27] Yong, Li, Wang, B., and Cui, M. 2022. Environmental concern, environmental knowledge, and residents’ water conservation behavior: Evidence from China. Water, 14(13): 2087. DOI:
[28] *** South Africa, Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS). 2018. National Water Master Plan. Volume 1: A Call to Action: Ready for the future and Ahead of the Curve. Available at:
How to Cite
BANOO, Ismail; DORASAMY, Nirmala; BUX, Faizal. Climate Change Impacts and Environmental and Water use Behaviors, Beliefs and Perceptions. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 14, n. 1, p. 225 - 235, mar. 2023. ISSN 2068-7729. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 23 mar. 2023. doi: