“Green Products”: A Review with the Consumer Buying Process Framework
Abstract
Green consumption has become a crucial academic and practical topic with the increasing environmental-protection awareness of scholars, industries and consumers. However, the growth in green purchasing may not reflect the concerns. This study aims to synthesize recent research and points several causes of low purchases to green products in the consumer perspective and provide a comprehensive understanding to the realistic consumer decision-making process. Through the scope of Consumer Buying Process framework, this study systematically reviewed 73 credible articles on green purchase behaviour published from 2010 to 2022. Main constructs and theories applied in selected literature is further discussed in each sector of the CBP framework. The study results showed the green purchase process may have a ‘loop tendency’ that falls into the circulation of construction of evaluation and adoption of those evaluations. Moreover, purchasing behaviour which performed by minority of the consumers may not be strong enough to form a valid social norm, and the current available still lacked power to fulfil consumer needs. With the modified consumer buying process framework, this study highlights the importance of creating memorable experience and build strong emotional communications with consumers.
References
[1] Ahmad, W. and Zhang, Q. 2020. Green purchase intention: Effects of electronic service quality and customer green psychology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 267: 122053. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122053
[2] Becker-Leifhold, C.V. 2018. The role of values in collaborative fashion consumption - A critical investigation through the lenses of the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199: 781-791. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.296
[3] Bósquez, N.G.C, and Arias-Bolzmann, L.G. 2022. Factors influencing green purchasing inconsistency of Ecuadorian millennials. British Food Journal, 124 (8): 2461-2480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2021-0558
[4] Bouman, T. and Steg, L. 2019. Motivating society-wide pro-environmental change. One Earth, 1(1): 27-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.08.002
[5] Bouman, T., van der Werff, E., Perlaviciute, G. and Steg, L. 2021. Environmental values and identities at the personal and group level. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42: 47-53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha. 2021.02.022
[6] Bray, J., Johns, N. and Kilburn, D. 2011. An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4): 597-608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0640-9
[7] Brosch, T. and Steg, L. 2021. Leveraging emotion for sustainable action. One Earth, 4(12):1693-1703. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.11.006
[8] Cervellon, M.C., Carey, L. and Harms, T. 2012. Something old, something used: Determinants of women's purchase of vintage fashion vs second‐hand fashion. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 40 (12): 956-974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09590551211274946
[9] Chan, T.Y. and Wong, C.W. 2012. The consumption side of sustainable fashion supply chain: Understanding fashion consumer eco‐fashion consumption decision. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 16 (2):193-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13612021211222824
[10] Chen, S., et al. 2021. Consumption behavior of eco-friendly products and applications of ICT innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287: 125436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125436
[11] Chen, Y.S. and Chang, C.H. 2013. Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3): 489-500. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1360-0
[12] Cialdini, R.B. 2003. Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4): 105-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01242
[13] Cialdini, R.B. 2006. Influence: The psychology of persuasion, revised edition. Harper Business, 320 pp. Available at: https://www.bottegaprama.com/sites/default/files/webform/clothing_sketches/pdf-influence-the-psychology-of-persuasion-revised-edition-robert-b-cialdini-pdf-download-free-book-60c7b2d.pdf
[14] Coderoni, S. and Perito, M.A. 2020. Sustainable consumption in the circular economy. An analysis of consumers’ purchase intentions for waste-to-value food. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252: 119870. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119870
[15] Colasante, A. and D'Adamo, I. 2021. The circular economy and bioeconomy in the fashion sector: emergence of a “sustainability bias”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 329: 129774. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro. 2021.129774
[16] Cowan, K. and Kinley, T. 2014. Green spirit: consumer empathies for green apparel. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(5): 493-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12125
[17] Dangelico, R.M. and Vocalelli, D. 2017. “Green Marketing”: An analysis of definitions, strategy steps, and tools through a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165: 1263-1279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.184
[18] De Groot, J.I. and Steg, L. 2010. Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4): 368-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.002
[19] Dewey, J. 1910. How We Think. Heath and Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10903-000
[20] Dillahunt, T., Mankoff, J., Paulos, E. and Fussell, S. 2009. It's not all about" Green" energy use in low-income communities. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Ubiquitous computing, September, 255-264 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1620545.1620583
[21] Duong, C.D. 2021. Big five personality traits and green consumption: bridging the attitude-intention-behavior gap. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34 (6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2021-0276
[22] Gam, H.J. 2011. Are fashion‐conscious consumers more likely to adopt eco‐friendly clothing? Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 15 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13612021111132627
[23] Gao, Y., Li, H. and Luo, Y. 2015. An empirical study of wearable technology acceptance in healthcare. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115 (9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2015-0087
[24] Groening, C., Sarkis, J. and Zhu, Q., 2018. Green marketing consumer-level theory review: A compendium of applied theories and further research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 1848-1866. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.002
[25] Grunert, K.G., Hieke, S. and Wills, J. 2014. Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food policy, 44: 177-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.001
[26] Gursoy, D., Chi, O.H., Lu, L. and Nunkoo, R. 2019. Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. International Journal of Information Management, 49: 157-169. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.008
[27] Hagger, M.S., Rentzelas, P. and Chatzisarantis, N.L. 2014. Effects of individualist and collectivist group norms and choice on intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 38(2): 215-223. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9373-2
[28] Jacobs, K., Petersen, L., Hörisch, J. and Battenfeld, D. 2018. Green thinking but thoughtless buying? An empirical extension of the value-attitude-behaviour hierarchy in sustainable clothing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203: 1155-1169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.320
[29] Jaffal, I., Ouldboukhitine, S.E. and Belarbi, R. 2012. A comprehensive study of the impact of green roofs on building energy performance. Renewable Energy, 43: 157-164. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.12.004
[30] Jaiswal, D. and Kant, R. 2018. Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41: 60-69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.008
[31] Jaiswal, D., Kaushal, V., Singh, P.K. and Biswas, A. 2020. Green market segmentation and consumer profiling: A cluster approach to an emerging consumer market. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28 (3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2020-0247
[32] Joshi, Y. and Rahman, Z. 2015. Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1-2): 128-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001
[33] Ketelsen, M., Janssen, M., and Hamm, U. 2020. Consumers’ response to environmentally-friendly food packaging - A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254:.120123. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro. 2020.120123
[34] Keyvanfar, A., et al. 2014. User satisfaction adaptive behaviors for assessing energy efficient building indoor cooling and lighting environment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39: 277-295. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.094
[35] Kim, S.H. and Seock, Y.K. 2019. The roles of values and social norm on personal norms and pro-environmentally friendly apparel product purchasing behavior: The mediating role of personal norms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51: 83-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.023
[36] Lavuri, R. 2022. Organic green purchasing: Moderation of environmental protection emotion and price sensitivity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 368: 133113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133113
[37] Leary, R.B., et al. 2014. Changing the marketplace one behavior at a time: Perceived marketplace influence and sustainable consumption. Journal of Business Research, 67(9): 1953-1958. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.004
[38] Lee, K., 2008. Opportunities for green marketing: young consumers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 26: 573-586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500810902839
[39] Lindenberg, S., Steg, L., Milovanovic, M., and Schipper, A. 2018. Moral hypocrisy and the hedonic shift: A goal-framing approach. Rationality and Society, 30(4): 393-419. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463118795719
[40] Liu, W., Oosterveer, P. and Spaargaren, G. 2016. Promoting sustainable consumption in China: A conceptual framework and research review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134: 13-21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.124
[41] Luchs, M.G. and Mooradian, T.A. 2012. Sex, personality, and sustainable consumer behaviour: Elucidating the gender effect. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35(1): 127-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-011-9179-0
[42] Lundblad, L., and Davies, I.A. 2016. The values and motivations behind sustainable fashion consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15(2): 149-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1559
[43] Martinez, C.P., Castaneda, M.G., Marte, R.B. and Roxas, B. 2015. Effects of institutions on ecological attitudes and behaviour of consumers in a developing Asian country: The case of the Philippines. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(6): 575-585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12188
[44] Milfont, T.L. and Markowitz, E. 2016. Sustainable consumer behavior: A multilevel perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10:112-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.12.016
[45] Nieroda, M.E., Mrad, M., and Solomon, M.R. 2018. How do consumers think about hybrid products? Computer wearables have an identity problem. Journal of Business Research, 89: 59-170. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.024
[46] Noppers, E., Keizer, K., Milovanovic, M. and Steg, L. 2019. The role of adoption norms and perceived product attributes in the adoption of Dutch electric vehicles and smart energy systems. Energy Research & Social Science, 57: 101237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101237
[47] Nyilasy, G., Gangadharbatla, H. and Paladino, A. 2012. Greenwashing: A consumer perspective. Economics & Sociology, 5(2): 116. Available at: https://www.proquest.com/openview/ae91eb4f4c1fc46e 970d3d20cbd0fbfa/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1416337
[48] Panda, T.K., et al. 2020. Social and environmental sustainability model on consumers’ altruism, green purchase intention, green brand loyalty and evangelism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243: 118575 DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118575
[49] Park, H.J. and Lin, L.M. 2020. Exploring attitude–behaviour gap in sustainable consumption: Comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products. Journal of Business Research, 117: 623-628.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.025
[50] Park, J. and Ha, S. 2012. Understanding pro‐environmental behaviour: A comparison of sustainable consumers and apathetic consumers. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09590551211222367
[51] Peattie, K. 2010. Green consumption: Behavior and Norms. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35(1): 195-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-032609-094328
[52] Phipps, M., et al. 2013. Understanding the inherent complexity of sustainable consumption: A social cognitive framework. Journal of Business Research, 66(8): 1227-1234. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.016
[53] Piselli, C., Salvadori, G., Diciotti, L., Fantozzi, F. and Pisello, A.L. 2021. Assessing users’ willingness-to-engagement towards Net Zero Energy communities in Italy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 152: 111627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111627
[54] Qazzafi, S.H.E.I.K.H. 2019. Consumer buying decision process toward products. International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Development, 2(5): 130-134. Available at: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloud front.net/60728740/IJSRED-V2I5P1520190928-129446-f04isc-libre.pdf?1569664425=&response-contendisposition
[55] Qi, X. and Ploeger, A. 2019. Explaining consumers' intentions towards purchasing green food in Qingdao, China: The amendment and extension of the theory of planned behaviours. Appetite, 133: 414-422. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.12.004
[56] Ramayah, T., Lee, J.W.C., and Mohamad, O. 2010. Green product purchase intention: Some insights from a developing country. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(12): 1419-1427. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.res conrec.2010.06.007
[57] Reimers, V., Magnuson, B. and Chao, F. 2017. Happiness, altruism and the Prius effect: how do they influence consumer attitudes towards environmentally responsible clothing? Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 21 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-07-2016-0053
[58] Santarius, T. and Soland, M. 2018. How technological efficiency improvements change consumer preferences: Towards a psychological theory of rebound effects. Ecological Economics, 146: 414-424. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.009
[59] Schmalfuß, F., Mühl, K. and Krems, J.F. 2017. Direct experience with battery electric vehicles (BEVs) matters when evaluating vehicle attributes, attitude and purchase intention. Transportation research part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 46: 47-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.01.004
[60] Schwartz, S.H. 1994. Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4): 19-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x
[61] Sloot, D., Jans, L. and Steg, L. 2019. In it for the money, the environment, or the community? Motives for being involved in community energy initiatives. Global Environmental Change, 57: 101936. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101936
[62] Song, S.Y. and Kim, Y.K. 2019. Doing good better: Impure altruism in green apparel advertising. Sustainability, 11(20): 5762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205762
[63] Song, X., et al. 2022. Factors affecting consumer choice of novel non-thermally processed fruit and vegetables products: Evidence from a 4-country study in Europe. Food Research International, 153: 110975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.110975
[64] Song, X., et al. 2020. European consumers’ perceptions and attitudes towards non-thermally processed fruit and vegetable products. Foods, 9(12): 1732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9121732
[65] Steg, L. and Vlek, C. 2008. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3): 309-317. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
[66] Stern, P.C., Dietz, T. and Vandenbergh, M.P. 2022. The science of mitigation: Closing the gap between potential and actual reduction of environmental threats. Energy Research & Social Science, 91: 102735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102735
[67] Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G.A. and Kalof, L. 1999. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, pp.81-97. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24707060
[68] Stranieri, S., Ricci, E.C. and Banterle, A. 2017. Convenience food with environmentally-sustainable attributes: A consumer perspective. Appetite, 116: 11-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.04.015
[69] Sun, Y., Li, T. and Wang, S. 2021. I buy green products for my benefits or yours”: understanding consumers' intention to purchase green products. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34 (8). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2021-0244
[70] Testa, F., et al. 2021. Drivers to green consumption: A systematic review. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(4): 4826-4880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00844-5
[71] Ünal, A.B., Steg, L. and Granskaya, J. 2019. To support or not to support, that is the question. Testing the VBN theory in predicting support for car use reduction policies in Russia. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 119: 73-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.042
[72] Van der Werff, E. and Steg, L. 2016. The psychology of participation and interest in smart energy systems: Comparing the value-belief-norm theory and the value-identity-personal norm model. Energy Research & Social Science, 22: 107-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.022
[73] Wang, Z., Zhao, C., Yin, J. and Zhang, B. 2017. Purchasing intentions of Chinese citizens on new energy vehicles: How should one respond to current preferential policy? Journal of Cleaner Production, 161:1000-1010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.154
[74] White, K., Habib, R. and Hardisty, D.J. 2019. How to SHIFT consumer behaviours to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3): 22-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0022242919825649
[75] Wiederhold, M. and Martinez, L.F. 2018. Ethical consumer behaviour in Germany: The attitude‐behaviour gap in the green apparel industry. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(4): 419-429. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12435
[76] Xu, X., Hua, Y., Wang, S. and Xu, G. 2020. Determinants of consumer’s intention to purchase authentic green furniture. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 156: 104721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.res conrec.2020.104721
[77] Yoo, S., Eom, J. and Han, I. 2020. Factors driving consumer involvement in energy consumption and energy-efficient purchasing behavior: evidence from Korean residential buildings. Sustainability, 12(14): 5573. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145573
[78] Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S. and Oates, C.J. 2010. Sustainable consumption: green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18(1): 20-31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.394
[79] Zhang, T., et al. 2019. The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation research part C: Emerging Technologies, 98: 207-220. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.018
[80] Zhang, X. and Dong, F. 2020. Why do consumers make green purchase decisions? Insights from a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18): 6607. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186607
[2] Becker-Leifhold, C.V. 2018. The role of values in collaborative fashion consumption - A critical investigation through the lenses of the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199: 781-791. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.296
[3] Bósquez, N.G.C, and Arias-Bolzmann, L.G. 2022. Factors influencing green purchasing inconsistency of Ecuadorian millennials. British Food Journal, 124 (8): 2461-2480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2021-0558
[4] Bouman, T. and Steg, L. 2019. Motivating society-wide pro-environmental change. One Earth, 1(1): 27-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.08.002
[5] Bouman, T., van der Werff, E., Perlaviciute, G. and Steg, L. 2021. Environmental values and identities at the personal and group level. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42: 47-53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha. 2021.02.022
[6] Bray, J., Johns, N. and Kilburn, D. 2011. An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4): 597-608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0640-9
[7] Brosch, T. and Steg, L. 2021. Leveraging emotion for sustainable action. One Earth, 4(12):1693-1703. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.11.006
[8] Cervellon, M.C., Carey, L. and Harms, T. 2012. Something old, something used: Determinants of women's purchase of vintage fashion vs second‐hand fashion. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 40 (12): 956-974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09590551211274946
[9] Chan, T.Y. and Wong, C.W. 2012. The consumption side of sustainable fashion supply chain: Understanding fashion consumer eco‐fashion consumption decision. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 16 (2):193-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13612021211222824
[10] Chen, S., et al. 2021. Consumption behavior of eco-friendly products and applications of ICT innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287: 125436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125436
[11] Chen, Y.S. and Chang, C.H. 2013. Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3): 489-500. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1360-0
[12] Cialdini, R.B. 2003. Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4): 105-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01242
[13] Cialdini, R.B. 2006. Influence: The psychology of persuasion, revised edition. Harper Business, 320 pp. Available at: https://www.bottegaprama.com/sites/default/files/webform/clothing_sketches/pdf-influence-the-psychology-of-persuasion-revised-edition-robert-b-cialdini-pdf-download-free-book-60c7b2d.pdf
[14] Coderoni, S. and Perito, M.A. 2020. Sustainable consumption in the circular economy. An analysis of consumers’ purchase intentions for waste-to-value food. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252: 119870. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119870
[15] Colasante, A. and D'Adamo, I. 2021. The circular economy and bioeconomy in the fashion sector: emergence of a “sustainability bias”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 329: 129774. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro. 2021.129774
[16] Cowan, K. and Kinley, T. 2014. Green spirit: consumer empathies for green apparel. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(5): 493-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12125
[17] Dangelico, R.M. and Vocalelli, D. 2017. “Green Marketing”: An analysis of definitions, strategy steps, and tools through a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165: 1263-1279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.184
[18] De Groot, J.I. and Steg, L. 2010. Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4): 368-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.002
[19] Dewey, J. 1910. How We Think. Heath and Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10903-000
[20] Dillahunt, T., Mankoff, J., Paulos, E. and Fussell, S. 2009. It's not all about" Green" energy use in low-income communities. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Ubiquitous computing, September, 255-264 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1620545.1620583
[21] Duong, C.D. 2021. Big five personality traits and green consumption: bridging the attitude-intention-behavior gap. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34 (6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2021-0276
[22] Gam, H.J. 2011. Are fashion‐conscious consumers more likely to adopt eco‐friendly clothing? Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 15 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13612021111132627
[23] Gao, Y., Li, H. and Luo, Y. 2015. An empirical study of wearable technology acceptance in healthcare. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115 (9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2015-0087
[24] Groening, C., Sarkis, J. and Zhu, Q., 2018. Green marketing consumer-level theory review: A compendium of applied theories and further research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 1848-1866. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.002
[25] Grunert, K.G., Hieke, S. and Wills, J. 2014. Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food policy, 44: 177-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.001
[26] Gursoy, D., Chi, O.H., Lu, L. and Nunkoo, R. 2019. Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. International Journal of Information Management, 49: 157-169. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.008
[27] Hagger, M.S., Rentzelas, P. and Chatzisarantis, N.L. 2014. Effects of individualist and collectivist group norms and choice on intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 38(2): 215-223. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9373-2
[28] Jacobs, K., Petersen, L., Hörisch, J. and Battenfeld, D. 2018. Green thinking but thoughtless buying? An empirical extension of the value-attitude-behaviour hierarchy in sustainable clothing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203: 1155-1169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.320
[29] Jaffal, I., Ouldboukhitine, S.E. and Belarbi, R. 2012. A comprehensive study of the impact of green roofs on building energy performance. Renewable Energy, 43: 157-164. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.12.004
[30] Jaiswal, D. and Kant, R. 2018. Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41: 60-69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.008
[31] Jaiswal, D., Kaushal, V., Singh, P.K. and Biswas, A. 2020. Green market segmentation and consumer profiling: A cluster approach to an emerging consumer market. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28 (3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2020-0247
[32] Joshi, Y. and Rahman, Z. 2015. Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1-2): 128-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001
[33] Ketelsen, M., Janssen, M., and Hamm, U. 2020. Consumers’ response to environmentally-friendly food packaging - A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254:.120123. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro. 2020.120123
[34] Keyvanfar, A., et al. 2014. User satisfaction adaptive behaviors for assessing energy efficient building indoor cooling and lighting environment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39: 277-295. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.094
[35] Kim, S.H. and Seock, Y.K. 2019. The roles of values and social norm on personal norms and pro-environmentally friendly apparel product purchasing behavior: The mediating role of personal norms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51: 83-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.023
[36] Lavuri, R. 2022. Organic green purchasing: Moderation of environmental protection emotion and price sensitivity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 368: 133113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133113
[37] Leary, R.B., et al. 2014. Changing the marketplace one behavior at a time: Perceived marketplace influence and sustainable consumption. Journal of Business Research, 67(9): 1953-1958. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.004
[38] Lee, K., 2008. Opportunities for green marketing: young consumers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 26: 573-586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500810902839
[39] Lindenberg, S., Steg, L., Milovanovic, M., and Schipper, A. 2018. Moral hypocrisy and the hedonic shift: A goal-framing approach. Rationality and Society, 30(4): 393-419. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463118795719
[40] Liu, W., Oosterveer, P. and Spaargaren, G. 2016. Promoting sustainable consumption in China: A conceptual framework and research review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134: 13-21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.124
[41] Luchs, M.G. and Mooradian, T.A. 2012. Sex, personality, and sustainable consumer behaviour: Elucidating the gender effect. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35(1): 127-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-011-9179-0
[42] Lundblad, L., and Davies, I.A. 2016. The values and motivations behind sustainable fashion consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15(2): 149-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1559
[43] Martinez, C.P., Castaneda, M.G., Marte, R.B. and Roxas, B. 2015. Effects of institutions on ecological attitudes and behaviour of consumers in a developing Asian country: The case of the Philippines. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(6): 575-585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12188
[44] Milfont, T.L. and Markowitz, E. 2016. Sustainable consumer behavior: A multilevel perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10:112-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.12.016
[45] Nieroda, M.E., Mrad, M., and Solomon, M.R. 2018. How do consumers think about hybrid products? Computer wearables have an identity problem. Journal of Business Research, 89: 59-170. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.024
[46] Noppers, E., Keizer, K., Milovanovic, M. and Steg, L. 2019. The role of adoption norms and perceived product attributes in the adoption of Dutch electric vehicles and smart energy systems. Energy Research & Social Science, 57: 101237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101237
[47] Nyilasy, G., Gangadharbatla, H. and Paladino, A. 2012. Greenwashing: A consumer perspective. Economics & Sociology, 5(2): 116. Available at: https://www.proquest.com/openview/ae91eb4f4c1fc46e 970d3d20cbd0fbfa/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1416337
[48] Panda, T.K., et al. 2020. Social and environmental sustainability model on consumers’ altruism, green purchase intention, green brand loyalty and evangelism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243: 118575 DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118575
[49] Park, H.J. and Lin, L.M. 2020. Exploring attitude–behaviour gap in sustainable consumption: Comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products. Journal of Business Research, 117: 623-628.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.025
[50] Park, J. and Ha, S. 2012. Understanding pro‐environmental behaviour: A comparison of sustainable consumers and apathetic consumers. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09590551211222367
[51] Peattie, K. 2010. Green consumption: Behavior and Norms. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35(1): 195-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-032609-094328
[52] Phipps, M., et al. 2013. Understanding the inherent complexity of sustainable consumption: A social cognitive framework. Journal of Business Research, 66(8): 1227-1234. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.016
[53] Piselli, C., Salvadori, G., Diciotti, L., Fantozzi, F. and Pisello, A.L. 2021. Assessing users’ willingness-to-engagement towards Net Zero Energy communities in Italy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 152: 111627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111627
[54] Qazzafi, S.H.E.I.K.H. 2019. Consumer buying decision process toward products. International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Development, 2(5): 130-134. Available at: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloud front.net/60728740/IJSRED-V2I5P1520190928-129446-f04isc-libre.pdf?1569664425=&response-contendisposition
[55] Qi, X. and Ploeger, A. 2019. Explaining consumers' intentions towards purchasing green food in Qingdao, China: The amendment and extension of the theory of planned behaviours. Appetite, 133: 414-422. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.12.004
[56] Ramayah, T., Lee, J.W.C., and Mohamad, O. 2010. Green product purchase intention: Some insights from a developing country. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(12): 1419-1427. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.res conrec.2010.06.007
[57] Reimers, V., Magnuson, B. and Chao, F. 2017. Happiness, altruism and the Prius effect: how do they influence consumer attitudes towards environmentally responsible clothing? Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 21 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-07-2016-0053
[58] Santarius, T. and Soland, M. 2018. How technological efficiency improvements change consumer preferences: Towards a psychological theory of rebound effects. Ecological Economics, 146: 414-424. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.009
[59] Schmalfuß, F., Mühl, K. and Krems, J.F. 2017. Direct experience with battery electric vehicles (BEVs) matters when evaluating vehicle attributes, attitude and purchase intention. Transportation research part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 46: 47-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.01.004
[60] Schwartz, S.H. 1994. Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4): 19-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x
[61] Sloot, D., Jans, L. and Steg, L. 2019. In it for the money, the environment, or the community? Motives for being involved in community energy initiatives. Global Environmental Change, 57: 101936. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101936
[62] Song, S.Y. and Kim, Y.K. 2019. Doing good better: Impure altruism in green apparel advertising. Sustainability, 11(20): 5762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205762
[63] Song, X., et al. 2022. Factors affecting consumer choice of novel non-thermally processed fruit and vegetables products: Evidence from a 4-country study in Europe. Food Research International, 153: 110975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.110975
[64] Song, X., et al. 2020. European consumers’ perceptions and attitudes towards non-thermally processed fruit and vegetable products. Foods, 9(12): 1732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9121732
[65] Steg, L. and Vlek, C. 2008. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3): 309-317. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
[66] Stern, P.C., Dietz, T. and Vandenbergh, M.P. 2022. The science of mitigation: Closing the gap between potential and actual reduction of environmental threats. Energy Research & Social Science, 91: 102735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102735
[67] Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G.A. and Kalof, L. 1999. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, pp.81-97. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24707060
[68] Stranieri, S., Ricci, E.C. and Banterle, A. 2017. Convenience food with environmentally-sustainable attributes: A consumer perspective. Appetite, 116: 11-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.04.015
[69] Sun, Y., Li, T. and Wang, S. 2021. I buy green products for my benefits or yours”: understanding consumers' intention to purchase green products. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34 (8). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2021-0244
[70] Testa, F., et al. 2021. Drivers to green consumption: A systematic review. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(4): 4826-4880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00844-5
[71] Ünal, A.B., Steg, L. and Granskaya, J. 2019. To support or not to support, that is the question. Testing the VBN theory in predicting support for car use reduction policies in Russia. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 119: 73-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.042
[72] Van der Werff, E. and Steg, L. 2016. The psychology of participation and interest in smart energy systems: Comparing the value-belief-norm theory and the value-identity-personal norm model. Energy Research & Social Science, 22: 107-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.022
[73] Wang, Z., Zhao, C., Yin, J. and Zhang, B. 2017. Purchasing intentions of Chinese citizens on new energy vehicles: How should one respond to current preferential policy? Journal of Cleaner Production, 161:1000-1010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.154
[74] White, K., Habib, R. and Hardisty, D.J. 2019. How to SHIFT consumer behaviours to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3): 22-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0022242919825649
[75] Wiederhold, M. and Martinez, L.F. 2018. Ethical consumer behaviour in Germany: The attitude‐behaviour gap in the green apparel industry. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(4): 419-429. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12435
[76] Xu, X., Hua, Y., Wang, S. and Xu, G. 2020. Determinants of consumer’s intention to purchase authentic green furniture. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 156: 104721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.res conrec.2020.104721
[77] Yoo, S., Eom, J. and Han, I. 2020. Factors driving consumer involvement in energy consumption and energy-efficient purchasing behavior: evidence from Korean residential buildings. Sustainability, 12(14): 5573. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145573
[78] Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S. and Oates, C.J. 2010. Sustainable consumption: green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18(1): 20-31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.394
[79] Zhang, T., et al. 2019. The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation research part C: Emerging Technologies, 98: 207-220. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.018
[80] Zhang, X. and Dong, F. 2020. Why do consumers make green purchase decisions? Insights from a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18): 6607. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186607
Published
2023-03-10
How to Cite
CAO, Yanghui.
“Green Products”: A Review with the Consumer Buying Process Framework.
Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 14, n. 1, p. 52 - 66, mar. 2023.
ISSN 2068-7729.
Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/7629>. Date accessed: 18 apr. 2024.
doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v13.1(65).06.
Section
Article
Copyright© 2023 The Author(s). Published by ASERS Publishing 2023. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of CC-BY 4.0 license.