Environmental Approaches for the Benchmarking of International Experience in the Use of Scientific Research in State Strategic Planning for a Sustainable Development

  • Ayapbergen TAUBAYEV Esil University, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Zhadyra ARKENOVA Karaganda University of Kazpotrebsoyuz, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Assemgul MUSSATAYEVA Academy of Public Administration, under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kazakhstan

Abstract

The prospects for sustainable development of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the factors influencing its development are considered as a long-term direction of structural policy, which makes it possible to create and actively develop sustainable development programs, minimize risks, increase competitiveness and open up new opportunities that take into account the negative impact on the environment. In this regard, the paper analyzes the mechanisms of scientific support of state strategic planning in the framework of environmental management, using the scientific potential of the academic environment, taking into account the opinion of the public and the expert community, as well as the creation of specialized research institutes. The results of this study will indicate the ways in which the innovative potential conducted by the public administration could use the potential of science to improve the efficiency of public policies in environment management for a sustainable development.


 

References

[1] Abdrakhmanova, D.R. 2019. Evolution of ideas about the system of strategic planning. Modern Problems of Social and Humanitarian Sciences, 2(4): 136-140.
[2] Barbazza, E., Klazinga, N.S., and Kringos, D.S. 2021. Exploring the actionability of healthcare performance indicators for quality of care: a qualitative analysis of the literature, expert opinion and user experience. BMJ Quality & Safety, 30: 1010 – 1020. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011247
[3] Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F.E., and Sanctis, I.D. 2017. Lean practices implementation and their relationships with operational responsiveness and company performance: An Italian study. International Journal of Production Research, 55(3): 769-794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1211346
[4] Bod, R. 2015. A Comparative Framework for Studying the Histories of the Humanities and Science. Isis - An international review devoted to the history of science and its cultural influences, 106(2): 367–377. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/681979
[5] Burritt, R.L., Herzig, C., Schaltegger, S., and Viere, T. 2019. Diffusion of environmental management accounting for cleaner production: Evidence from some case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 224: 479–491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.227
[6] Cokins, G., et al. 2020. Intention to Use Accounting Platforms in Romania: A Quantitative Study on Sustainability and Social Influence. Sustainability, 12: 6127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156127
[7] Colicchia C., Creazza, A. and Dallari, F. 2017. Lean and green supply chain management through intermodal transport: insights from the fast moving consumer goods industry. Production Planning & Control, 28(4): 321-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1282642
[8] Doorasamy, M. 2018. Benchmarking: Business strategy to improve environmental performance. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 12(2): 214-229. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/
[9] Filho, M.G., Ganga, G.M.D., and Gunasekaran, A. 2018. Lean manufacturing in Brazilian small and medium enterprises: implementation and effect on performance. International Journal of Production Research, 54(24): 7523-7545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1201606
[10] Frolov, S.V. 2019. Benchmarking in the state strategic management. Innovations and Investments, 12: 126-128.
[11] Grant, R. 2018. Contemporary Strategy Analysis. St. Petersburg: Peter. 672 p. Available at: https://www.homeworkforyou.com/
[12] Hong, P., Hong, S.W., Roh, A., and Park, K. 2022. Evolving benchmarking practices: A review for research perspectives. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 4/5(19): 444 - 462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ 14635771211257945
[13] Ionescu, C.A., et al. 2020. Sustainable Economic Intelligence: A New Dimension of Information Provided by Non-Financial Indicators. In Improving Business Performance through Innovation in the Digital Economy; IGI Global: Hershey PA, USA. 117–143 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1005-6.ch009
[14] Izmailova, M.A. 2021. Sustainable Development as a New Component of Corporate Social Responsibility. Modernization. Innovation. Research, 12(2): 100–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2021.12.2.100-113
[15] Kuhn, T. 1975. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Volumes I and II. Foundations of the Unity of Science Volume II(2) Moscow: Progress, 288 p. Available at: https://www.lri.fr/
[16] Latan, H., et al. 2018. Effects of environmental strategy, environmental uncertainty and top management’s commitment on corporate environmental performance: The role of environmental management accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180: 297–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.106
[17] Manes-Rossi, F., Tiron-Tudor, A., Nicolò, G., and Zanellato, G. 2018. Ensuring More Sustainable Reporting in Europe Using Non-Financial Disclosure - De Facto and De Jure Evidence. Sustainability, 10: 1162. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041162
[18] Mescon, M., Albert, M., and Hedouri, F. 1997. Переиздание 2018. Fundamentals of Management. Moscow: Williams, 492 p. Available at: http://www.gidromet.edu.kh.ua/
[19] Mikheev, V., and Ignatiev, S. 2019. The practice of strategic planning in North-East Asia, Federalism, 2: 156-171.
[20] Negrão, L.L.L., Filho, M.G., and Marodin, G. 2017. Lean practices and their effect on performance: A literature review. Production Planning & Control, 28(1): 33-56. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2016.1231853
[21] Nizetic, S., Djilali, N., Papadopoulos, A., and Rodrigues, J.J. 2019. Smart technologies for promotion of energy efficiency, utilization of sustainable resources and waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231: 565–591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.397
[22] Panwar A., et al. 2018. The impact of lean practices on operational performance – an empirical investigation of Indian process industries. Production Planning & Control, 29(2): 158-169. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1397788
[23] Panwar, A., Nepal, B.P., Jain, R., and Rathore, A.P.S. 2017. On the adoption of lean manufacturing principles in process industries. Production Planning & Control, 26(7): 564-587. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287. 2017.936532
[24] Pavlova, V.A., and Osipov, A.G. 2018. Scientific support of land assessment. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg State Agrarian University, 4 (49): 229-232.
[25] Petrescu, A.G., et al. 2020. Assessing the Benefits of the Sustainability Reporting Practices in the Top Romanian Companies. Sustainability, 12: 3470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083470
[26] Qian, W., Hörisch, J., and Schaltegger, S. 2018. Environmental management accounting and its effects on carbon management and disclosure quality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174: 1608–1619. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.092
[27] Rassadina, A.K. 2018. Planning as an instrument of state industrial policy: The experience of France, Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 6: Economics, 1: 122-139.
[28] Scarpellini, S., Marín-Vinuesa, L.M., Aranda-Usón, A., and Portillo-Tarragona, P. 2020. Dynamic capabilities and environmental accounting for the circular economy in businesses. Sustain. Account. Manag. Policy J., 11: 1129–1158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2019-0150
[29] Semenov, S.A., and Filatova, O.V. 2017. About the Directions of Improvement of Mechanisms of the Strategic Planning and the Territory Development Monitoring. Administrative Consulting, 11(5): 96-102. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2017-5-96-102
[30] Sharif, A., Bhattacharya, M., Afshan, S., and Shahbaz, M. 2021. Disaggregated renewable energy sources in mitigating CO2 emissions: new evidence from the USA using quantile regressions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28: 57582–57601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13829-2
[31] Stanescu, G., Cucui, I., Ionescu, C.A., and Paschia, L. 2021. Conceptual Model for Integrating Environmental Impact in Managerial Accounting Information Systems. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4):1791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041791
[32] Tabueva, E. Yu., and Konsovsky, A.A. 2020. The system of strategic planning in the People's Republic of China. Young Scientist, 42 (332): 138-141.
[33] Yuvitsa, N.V. 2018. Strategic planning and state management of Kazakhstan. International Journal of Experimental Education, 3-2: 247-249. Available at: http://www.expeducation.ru/ru/article/view?id=6832
[34] National Science Foundation: Science and Engineering Indicators, 2019. Available at: https://ncses.nsf.gov/indicators/ reports.
[35] Official resource of the Bureau of National Statistics of the Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2010-2021. Available at: http://www.stat.gov.kz
[36] Science Indicators: 2019: Statistical collection L.M. Gokhberg, K.A. Ditkovsky, E.L. Dyachenko and others; High School of Economics. – M.: NRU HSE, 2019. - 328 pp.
Published
2022-12-02
How to Cite
TAUBAYEV, Ayapbergen; ARKENOVA, Zhadyra; MUSSATAYEVA, Assemgul. Environmental Approaches for the Benchmarking of International Experience in the Use of Scientific Research in State Strategic Planning for a Sustainable Development. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 7, p. 1978 - 1992, dec. 2022. ISSN 2068-7729. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/7405>. Date accessed: 25 apr. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v13.7(63).18.