Financing the Agricultural Sector of the Economy and Its Impact on Sustainable Environmental Aspects

  • Aina AIDAROVA Mukhtar Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Kazakhstan
  • Gulbana MAULENKULOVA Mukhtar Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Kazakhstan
  • Marzhan DAURBAEVA Mukhtar Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Kazakhstan
  • Mazken KAMENOVA Kazakh Research Institute for Economics of Argo-Industrial Complex and Territories Development, Kazakhstan
  • Baglan AIMURZINA Astana International University, Kazakhstan
  • Sanim JANBIRBAEVA Almaty Management University, Kazakhstan

Abstract

Features of the agricultural sector are closely related to biological and natural-climatic processes and depend on the seasonality of economic activity, i.e. directly depend on climatic factors as the main source of production of land resources, the agro-industrial complex. An analysis of the state of the agricultural sector of the economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan shows some important problems related to the influence of environmental factors on the agro-industrial complex, as well as on financial relations in this sector, based on the basic principles that reflect the objective requirements for the development of public finances and environmental relations, for the rational distribution of agricultural products, which is associated with the need for financing and rational planning for the use of investments attracted to agriculture.

References

[1] Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., Wright, M. 2019. Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7): 1097–1108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.015
[2] Acs, Z.J., Stam, E., Audretsch, D.B., and O’Connor, A. 2017. The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1): 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8
[3] Amara, B.D., and Chen, H. 2022. Driving factors for eco-innovation orientation: meeting sustainable growth in Tunisian agribusiness. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 4(12): 792-799. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00792-0
[4] Blancard, S., and Martin, E. 2018. Energy efficiency measurement in agriculture with imprecise energy content information. Energy Policy, 14(66): 198–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.071
[5] Guerrero, M., Liñán, R. and Cáceres-Carrasco, F. 2021. The influence of ecosystems on the entrepreneurship process: a comparison across developed and developing economies. Small Business Economics, 2(57): 1733–1759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00392-2
[6] Hultgren J., Heron M., Glimsker A., Bockers A.M., and Keeling L.J. 2022. Environmental Quality and Compliance with Animal Welfare Legislation at Swedish Cattle and Sheep Farms. Sustainability, 14(3): 1095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031095
[7] Malorgio, G., and Marangon, F. 2021. Agricultural business economics: the challenge of sustainability. Agriculture Economy, 9(6): 3-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-021-00179-3
[8] Nurmanbetova A., et al. 2021. Agro-industrial complex competitiveness management based on sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 12(1): 64–80. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v12.1(49).06
[9] Perez-Lombard, L., Ortizb, J., Gonzáleza, R., and Maestrec, I.R. 2019. A review of benchmarking, rating and labelling concepts within the framework of building energy certification schemes. Energy and Buildings, 41(3): 272–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.10.004
[10] Petrikov, A.V. 2022. Structural policy priorities in agriculture of Russia. Problems of Agri Market, 1(1): 13-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46666/2022-1.2708-9991.01
[11] Poore, J., and Nemecek, T. 2018. Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 16(360): 987. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaq0216
[12] Springmann, M., et al. 2018. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature, 94(562): 519–525. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0
[13] Stamkulova, K.U., and Stamkulova, M.U. 2022. Assessment of environmental safety indicators of rural areas. Problems of Agri Market, 1(1): 45-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46666/2022-1.2708-9991.04
[14] Urbano, D., Aparicio, S., and Audretsch, D. 2019. Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: What has been learned? Small Business Economics, 53(1): 21–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0038-0
[15] Yelchibayeva A., et al. 2021. Analysis of financial and economic aspects of company functioning and their influence on the tourist cluster. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 12(8): 2157–2167. DOI:10.14505/jemt.12.8(56).14
[16] Zholmukhanova, A.Z., Mukaliyeva, M.N., and Koitanova, A.Z. 2022. Monitoring of public support for agricultural producers in Germany and Kazakhstan. Problems of Agri Market, 1(1): 52-60. DOI:https://doi.org/10.46 666/2022-1.2708-9991.05
[17] Electronic resource of Environmental Performance Reviews. UNECE. Available at: www.https://unece.org/
[18] Official resource of Data of RSE “KazHydroMet”. Available at: http://www.kazhydromet.kz
[19] Official resource of Data from the Bureau of National Statistics of the Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Available at: http://www.stat.gov.kz
Published
2022-09-02
How to Cite
AIDAROVA, Aina et al. Financing the Agricultural Sector of the Economy and Its Impact on Sustainable Environmental Aspects. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 5, p. 1481 - 1492, sep. 2022. ISSN 2068-7729. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/7217>. Date accessed: 02 oct. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v13.5(61).23.