Institutional Environment for the "Green" Economy Development in Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug–Yugra
Abstract
The paper studies the prerequisites for the "green" economy development in Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug–Yugra (KHMAO-Yugra). The development degree of the institutional environment of the "green" economy in Russia is compared to the CIS, European and Asian states. Based on statistical data, the scale of the prevalence of "green" economy elements in Yugra is estimated. The composition and the state of the institutional environment of the "green" economy in Russia and in Yugra are described. The features of the institutional vacuum and institutional traps of the "green" economy development in Yugra are revealed. Proposals on the institutional environment change at the regional and federal levels for the "green" economy development stimulation are given.
References
[1] Andreeva, L.Y., et al. 2017. Institutions and instruments of "green finance": risks and opportunities for sustainable development of the Russian economy. Forestry Engineering Journal, 2: 205-214.
[2] Andreeva, O.V., Melekhova, M.A. Turichenko, L.P. and Chernobay, O.S. 2020. Financial institutions and instruments of the "green" economy. Fundamental Research, 8: 7-11.
[3] Baranova, P. and F. Paterson. 2017. Environmental capabilities of small and medium sized enterprises: towards transition to a low carbon economy in the East Midlands. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 32(8): 835-853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0269094217744494
[4] Dulala, H.B., Dulalb, R. and Yadavc, P.K. 2015. Delivering green economy in Asia: the role of fiscal instruments. Futures, 73: 61-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.08.002
[5] Galcheva, A. 2019. Rossiya na tret' uvelichila vvoz plastikovogo musora iz-za granitsy [Russia has increased the import of plastic waste from abroad by a third]. Available at: https://www.rbc.ru/economics/30/08/2019/5d67e17f9a7947d966d7fd3d
[6] Gasparatos, A., et al. 2017. Renewable energy and biodiversity: Implications for transitioning to a Green Economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70: 161-184. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.030
[7] Glazyrina, I.P. and Zabelina, I.A. 2020. Jevons’ paradox revisited: do Russian environmental institutions contribute to green growth? Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 13(4): 496-506. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0584
[8] Heshmati, A. 2014. An empirical survey of the ramifications of a green economy. Discussion Paper No. 8078. Available at: http://ftp.iza.org/dp8078.pdf
[9] Islamutdinov, V.F. 2016. Institutions for stimulating the innovative behavior of economic entities in KMAO-Yugra: evolution, specifics and institutional traps. Innovation, 4(210): 89-96.
[10] Ivanov, N.A., Kozhushkina, I.V., Oborin, M.S. and Sheresheva, M.Y. 2017. Development of characteristics of the institutional environment for modeling the sustainable development of territories. Herald of Daghestan State Technical University. Technical sciences, 44(3):185-198. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2017-44-3-185-198
[11] Kabir, L.S. 2019. State support for "green" investments and market "green" financing: best international practices. Innovatics and Expert Examination, 1(26): 97-108.
[12] Kashuro, I.A., and Oskina, A.D. 2017. Modern aspects of the "green" economy, case study of Italy. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 27. Globalistics and geopolitics, 2: 30-36.
[13] Khachaturian, A.A. 2012. The need, methods and institutions of state stimulation for innovative activity of organizations. Bulletin of the Moscow University named after S.Yu. Witte. Series 1: Economics and Management, 1(1): 39-44.
[14] Kiryushin, P. August 2014. “Green Economy”: opportunities and constraints for Russian companies. Russie.Nei.Visions, 79: 1-24. Available at: https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/ifri_rnv79_kiriouchine_green_economy_eng_august_2014_0.pdf
[15] Klyucharev, G.A., Arsentiev, M.V. and Trofimova, I.N. 2018. Institutes and practices of innovations stimulation: expert opinion. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 18(4): 668-679.
[16] Nikolaou, E.I., Ierapetritis, D. and Tsagarakis, K.P. 2011. An evaluation of the prospects of green entrepreneurship development using a SWOT analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 18(1): 1–16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2011.543565
[17] Nikulina, S.I. 2017. The state support mechanism for a resource-efficient low-carbon economy in Germany. Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow, 7(6A): 139-150.
[18] Ospanova, S. 2014. Assessing Kazakhstan’s policy and institutional framework for a green economy. International Institute for Environment and Development. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/resrep18089
[19] Ostapenko, A.V. 2018. “State-of-the-art analysis of the institutional environment of the "green" economy of the Russian Federation amid sustainable development”. In SPbPU Science Week, 19-24 November 2018, 482-485. St. Petersburg: FSAEIHE "SPbPU".
[20] Pociovălișteanu, D.M. et al. 2015. Employment policies for a green economy at the European Union level. Sustainability, 7: 9231-9250. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su7079231
[21] Popov, E.V. and Semyachkov, K.A. 2014. Typology of "green" economy institutions. Bulletin of UrFU. Series Economics and Management, 5: 4-14.
[22] Selin, H. and Najam, A. 2011. Beyond Rio+20: governance for a green economy. Boston, MA: Boston University. Available at: https://www.bu.edu/pardee/files/2011/03/Rio20TFC-Mar2011.pdf
[23] Shimova, O.S. 2018. The institutional environment of the "green" economy for the implementation of the global sustainable development goals at the national level. Scientific works of Belarus State Economic University, 11: 477-484.
[24] Shpak, N.A. 2014. Modern science parks and industrial parks as tools for the regional economy transition to the "green economy" principles. News of Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical Academy, 208: 267-275.
[25] Yakovlev, I.A., Kabir, L.S. Nikulina, S.I. and Rakov, I.D. 2020 Transformation of the national policy of commodity-producing countries under the influence of the global sustainable development agenda. Regional Economics, 16(3): 859-870.
[26] Yang, X., He, L., Zhong, Zh. and Wang, D. 2020. How does China's green institutional environment affect renewable energy investments? The nonlinear perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 727(1): 1-12.
[27] Ye, Q., et al. 2020. Entrepreneurs and environmental sustainability in the digital era: regional and institutional perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(4): 1-21. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041355
[28] Business and Society. 2019. "Green" economy: an institutional efficiency model. Available at: https://www.b-soc.ru/io/zelenaya-ekonomika-model-instituczionalnoj-effektivnosti/
[29] Division for Sustainable Development, UNDESA. 2012. A guidebook to the green economy. Issue 3: exploring green economy policies and international experience with national strategies. Available at: www.sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/738GE%.pdf
[30] OECD. 2012. Green growth and developing countries - Consultation draft. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/ru/node/17520 /ru/node/17520.
[2] Andreeva, O.V., Melekhova, M.A. Turichenko, L.P. and Chernobay, O.S. 2020. Financial institutions and instruments of the "green" economy. Fundamental Research, 8: 7-11.
[3] Baranova, P. and F. Paterson. 2017. Environmental capabilities of small and medium sized enterprises: towards transition to a low carbon economy in the East Midlands. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 32(8): 835-853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0269094217744494
[4] Dulala, H.B., Dulalb, R. and Yadavc, P.K. 2015. Delivering green economy in Asia: the role of fiscal instruments. Futures, 73: 61-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.08.002
[5] Galcheva, A. 2019. Rossiya na tret' uvelichila vvoz plastikovogo musora iz-za granitsy [Russia has increased the import of plastic waste from abroad by a third]. Available at: https://www.rbc.ru/economics/30/08/2019/5d67e17f9a7947d966d7fd3d
[6] Gasparatos, A., et al. 2017. Renewable energy and biodiversity: Implications for transitioning to a Green Economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70: 161-184. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.030
[7] Glazyrina, I.P. and Zabelina, I.A. 2020. Jevons’ paradox revisited: do Russian environmental institutions contribute to green growth? Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 13(4): 496-506. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0584
[8] Heshmati, A. 2014. An empirical survey of the ramifications of a green economy. Discussion Paper No. 8078. Available at: http://ftp.iza.org/dp8078.pdf
[9] Islamutdinov, V.F. 2016. Institutions for stimulating the innovative behavior of economic entities in KMAO-Yugra: evolution, specifics and institutional traps. Innovation, 4(210): 89-96.
[10] Ivanov, N.A., Kozhushkina, I.V., Oborin, M.S. and Sheresheva, M.Y. 2017. Development of characteristics of the institutional environment for modeling the sustainable development of territories. Herald of Daghestan State Technical University. Technical sciences, 44(3):185-198. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2017-44-3-185-198
[11] Kabir, L.S. 2019. State support for "green" investments and market "green" financing: best international practices. Innovatics and Expert Examination, 1(26): 97-108.
[12] Kashuro, I.A., and Oskina, A.D. 2017. Modern aspects of the "green" economy, case study of Italy. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 27. Globalistics and geopolitics, 2: 30-36.
[13] Khachaturian, A.A. 2012. The need, methods and institutions of state stimulation for innovative activity of organizations. Bulletin of the Moscow University named after S.Yu. Witte. Series 1: Economics and Management, 1(1): 39-44.
[14] Kiryushin, P. August 2014. “Green Economy”: opportunities and constraints for Russian companies. Russie.Nei.Visions, 79: 1-24. Available at: https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/ifri_rnv79_kiriouchine_green_economy_eng_august_2014_0.pdf
[15] Klyucharev, G.A., Arsentiev, M.V. and Trofimova, I.N. 2018. Institutes and practices of innovations stimulation: expert opinion. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 18(4): 668-679.
[16] Nikolaou, E.I., Ierapetritis, D. and Tsagarakis, K.P. 2011. An evaluation of the prospects of green entrepreneurship development using a SWOT analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 18(1): 1–16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2011.543565
[17] Nikulina, S.I. 2017. The state support mechanism for a resource-efficient low-carbon economy in Germany. Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow, 7(6A): 139-150.
[18] Ospanova, S. 2014. Assessing Kazakhstan’s policy and institutional framework for a green economy. International Institute for Environment and Development. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/resrep18089
[19] Ostapenko, A.V. 2018. “State-of-the-art analysis of the institutional environment of the "green" economy of the Russian Federation amid sustainable development”. In SPbPU Science Week, 19-24 November 2018, 482-485. St. Petersburg: FSAEIHE "SPbPU".
[20] Pociovălișteanu, D.M. et al. 2015. Employment policies for a green economy at the European Union level. Sustainability, 7: 9231-9250. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su7079231
[21] Popov, E.V. and Semyachkov, K.A. 2014. Typology of "green" economy institutions. Bulletin of UrFU. Series Economics and Management, 5: 4-14.
[22] Selin, H. and Najam, A. 2011. Beyond Rio+20: governance for a green economy. Boston, MA: Boston University. Available at: https://www.bu.edu/pardee/files/2011/03/Rio20TFC-Mar2011.pdf
[23] Shimova, O.S. 2018. The institutional environment of the "green" economy for the implementation of the global sustainable development goals at the national level. Scientific works of Belarus State Economic University, 11: 477-484.
[24] Shpak, N.A. 2014. Modern science parks and industrial parks as tools for the regional economy transition to the "green economy" principles. News of Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical Academy, 208: 267-275.
[25] Yakovlev, I.A., Kabir, L.S. Nikulina, S.I. and Rakov, I.D. 2020 Transformation of the national policy of commodity-producing countries under the influence of the global sustainable development agenda. Regional Economics, 16(3): 859-870.
[26] Yang, X., He, L., Zhong, Zh. and Wang, D. 2020. How does China's green institutional environment affect renewable energy investments? The nonlinear perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 727(1): 1-12.
[27] Ye, Q., et al. 2020. Entrepreneurs and environmental sustainability in the digital era: regional and institutional perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(4): 1-21. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041355
[28] Business and Society. 2019. "Green" economy: an institutional efficiency model. Available at: https://www.b-soc.ru/io/zelenaya-ekonomika-model-instituczionalnoj-effektivnosti/
[29] Division for Sustainable Development, UNDESA. 2012. A guidebook to the green economy. Issue 3: exploring green economy policies and international experience with national strategies. Available at: www.sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/738GE%.pdf
[30] OECD. 2012. Green growth and developing countries - Consultation draft. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/ru/node/17520 /ru/node/17520.
Published
2021-12-01
How to Cite
ISLAMUTDINOV, V. F. et al.
Institutional Environment for the "Green" Economy Development in Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug–Yugra.
Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 7, p. 1882 - 1892, dec. 2021.
ISSN 2068-7729.
Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/6581>. Date accessed: 20 apr. 2024.
doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.12.7(55).13.
Section
Article
Copyright© 2023 The Author(s). Published by ASERS Publishing 2023. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of CC-BY 4.0 license.