Analysis of the Development of Innovative Entrepreneurship for the Assess Their Competitiveness and Environmental Impact Factors

  • Julia VIKULENKO Karaganda Economic University of Kazpotrebsoyuz, Kazakhstan
  • Anargul BELGIBAYEVA Sh. Ualikhanov Kokshetau University, Kazakhstan
  • Oxana DENISSOVA D. Serikbayev East Kazakhstan Technical University, Kazakhstan
  • Gulzhan ABAUOVA Kazakh University of Economics, Finance and International Trade, Kazakhstan
  • Aigul TULEMETOVA M.Auezov South-Kazakhstan University, Kazakhstan
  • Rysty SADYKOVA Kazakh University of Economics, Finance and International Trade, Kazakhstan

Abstract

The development of innovative processes reflects the general state of the economy and is conditioned by socio-economic transformations. The main context of these changes is associated with the formation of a new, entrepreneurial culture, the order and methods of coordination and interaction between the subjects of innovation. As a result, there is an active search for new paradigms corresponding to the ongoing changes in the period of integration and globalization of relations. Using statistical data on the development of SMEs in the Republic of Kazakhstan, authors posed and solved the problem of establishing such a relationship based on the results of using a complex index known as the index of structural-dynamic analysis, which is known in foreign literature as a “shift-share analysis” tool.


 

References

[1] Abu-Rumman, A., Shraah, A.A., Al-Madi, F. and Alfalah, T. 2021. Entrepreneurial networks, entrepreneurial orientation, and performance of small and medium enterprises: are dynamic capabilities the missing link? Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 7(10): 29-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-021-00170-8
[2] Bell, R. 2016. Developing the next generation of entrepreneurs: Giving students the opportunity to gain experience and thrive. International Journal of Management Education, 13(1): 37–47 DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2016.12.002
[3] Bobylev, S.N. and Solovyeva, S. V. 2020. Circular economy and its indicators for Russia. The World of the New Economy, 14(2): 63-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2020-14-2-63-72
[4] Bogatenkov S.A., Belevitin V.A., Khasanova M.L. 2018. Risk Management Based on Model of Competences when Introducing Innovative Information Technology. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(38): 78-81. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencepubco.com%2Findex.php%2FIJET
[5] Chebukhanova, L.V. 2019. Financing of small and medium-sized innovative enterprises in the UK. Bulletin of the Buryat State University. Economics and Management, 3 (11): 78–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18101/2304-4446-2019-3-78-8620
[6] Engidaw, A.E. 2021. Exploring internal business factors and the irimpact on firm performance: small business perspective in Ethiopia. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(25): 167-172. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-021-00167-3
[7] Gherghina, S., Botezatu, M.A., Hosszu, A. and Simionescu, L.N. 2020. Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): The Engine of Economic Growth through Investments and Innovation. Sustainability, 12(1): 347-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010347
[8] Kalkabayeva G. et al. 2020. Financial sector assets, real innovation and economic growth: Assessment of interconnection and influence of regulatory instruments. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(2): 559–577.
[9] Karimi S., et al. 2017. Testing the relationship between personality intentions in a developing country. International Journal of Psychology, 2(10): 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop
[10] Kazakova, M.V. and Pospelova, E.A. 2017. The quality of infrastructure as one of the limitations of economic growth: a comparative analysis of Russia and countries of the world. Journal of International Economic Affairs, 7 (3): 380-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18334/eo.7.3.38071
[11] Kirilchuk, S.P. and Nalivaychenko, E. V. 2017. The Development of Globality of Innovative Modifications. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 9(1S): 1025-1048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v9i1s.754
[12] Kulmaganbetova, A.S., Dubina, I.N. and Rakhmetulina, J.B. 2019. A component-wise assessment of the innovative potential of small and medium-sized businesses: the experience of Kazakhstan. Economics. Profession. Business, 3(14): 34-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14258/epb201934
[13] Maschenko, M.V. and Volkova, E.A. 2018. The impact of investment processes on the development of mining enterprises in Russia. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law, 8(2): 388-394. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.8.2.38800
[14] Moroz, P.W. and Hindle, K. 2018. Entrepreneurship as a process: Toward harmonizing multiple perspectives. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(4): 781–818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2018.00452.x
[15] Ndofirepi, T.M. 2020. Relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial goal intentions: psychological traits as mediators. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9(2): 15-21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-020-0115-x
[16] Nieves, J. and Segarra-Cipres, M. 2017. Management innovation in the hotel industry. Tourism Management, 11(46): 51–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.06.002
[17] Novichkov, N. V., Novichkova, A.V. and Malygina, O.V. 2018. Tourism business innovation in the experience economy. Services in Russia and Abroad, 12(2): 6-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1995- 042X-2018-10201
[18] Novichkov, N.V., Novichkova, A.V. and Malygina, O.V. 2018. Tourism business innovation in the experience economy. Services in Russia and Abroad, 12(2): 6-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1995- 042X-2018-10201
[19] Orlov, S.N. 2020. Problems of development of small and medium-sized businesses in the context of dynamic development. Management in modern systems, 1(25): 27-33. Available at: http://journal.inueco.ru/journal_25_4/
[20] Ovsyannikova, T.Yu., Rabtsevich, O.V. and Yugova, I.V. 2018. Imbalances in the housing investment: an analysis of the causes and assessing the consequences. Russian Journal of Housing Research, 5(4): 396-401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18334/zhs.5.4.39694
[21] Prakash, D., Jain, S. and Chauhan, K. 2017. Entrepreneurial intensity in relation to presence of entrepreneurship development cell: A study of institutes offering professional courses in national capital region Delhi. International Journal of Management Education, 13(1): 95–105. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.01.004
[22] Solesvik, M.Z., Westhead, P., Matlay, H. and Parsyak, V.N. 2018. Entrepreneurial assets and mind sets benefit from university entrepreneurship education investment. Education+Training, 11(9): 748–762.
[23] Zhussupov Y. et al. 2020. Main directions of increasing competitiveness considering specificity of agriculture and its sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 11(7): 1829–1840.
[24] Official resource of RSE "KazHydroMet". http://www.kazhydromet.kz
[25] Official website of the Committee on Statistics of the Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. www.stat.gov.kz
[26] Strategic plan of the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2017 – 2021.
Published
2021-12-01
How to Cite
VIKULENKO, Julia et al. Analysis of the Development of Innovative Entrepreneurship for the Assess Their Competitiveness and Environmental Impact Factors. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 7, p. 1861 -1874, dec. 2021. ISSN 2068-7729. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/6579>. Date accessed: 04 dec. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.12.7(55).11.