Travel Bubble Policy Supporting between Thailand and Laos: Evidence from Tourist Market Integration Testing

  • Wisitsiri CHUSAKUL Faculty of Management Science Loei Rajabhat University, Thailand
  • Sakkarin NONTHAPOT Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies Khon Kaen University, Thailand


This paper examines international tourist market integration for international tourists from China, Japan, Malaysia, Korea and USA visiting Thailand and Laos for supporting the travel bubble policy. These are being integrated to be offered as a single destination, using quarterly data from 2001 to 2019. The cointegration test of the ARDL approach assesses the number of international tourists. The results of the research show that the tourism markets of Thailand and Laos are integrated. In the short run, international tourists from China and Malaysia who visit Laos also visit Thailand.  Bi-directional causality was evident for tourists from Japan, Korea and the USA. For long run causality, tourists from Japan, Malaysia, Korea and the USA who visit Laos also visit Thailand. Therefore, we can confirm that both Thailand and Laos follow the single destination policy and both countries are complementary tourism destinations for international tourists. Therefore, this study confirms that Thailand and Laos can be launch the travel bubble policy. The Thailand and Laos governments should target tourism markets by travel bubble policy with special protocols that is designed to improve competitiveness or to enhance tourism market efficiency.


[1] Asche, F., Gordon, D.V., and Hannesson, R. 2004. Tests for market integration and the law of one price: the market for whitefish in France. Marine Resource Economics, 19: 195-210.
[2] Dickey, D.A., and Fuller, W.A. 1981. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49: 1057-1072.
[3] Engle, R.F., Granger, C.J. 1987. Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55: 251 -276.
[4] Johansen, S., Juselius, K. 1990. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52: 1551-1580.
[5] Lohano, H.D., Mari, F.M. 2006. Testing market integration in regional onion markets of Pakistan: application of error correction model in the presence of stationarity. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 1: 89-97.
[6] Meyer, J. 2004. Measuring market integration in the presence of transaction costs – a threshold vector error correction approach. Agricultural Economics, 31(3): 327-334.
[7] Narayan, P.K. 2005. The saving and investment nexus for china: evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37: 1979 -1990.
[8] Nielsen, M.S., Guillen, J. 2009. Market integration of fish in Europe. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(2): 367–385.
[9] Nonthapot, S. 2020. The relationships among the five key foreign tourist markets in the Greater Mekong Sub-region. Decision Science Letters, 9(4). 511-520.
[10] Nonthapot, S. 2020b. The impact of tourism on electricity imports by Thailand from Lao People’s Democratic Republic. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(6): 190-194.
[11] Nonthapot, S., Watchalanun, T. 2015. Relationship between tourism expansion and telecommunication in Thailand. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 5(11): 37-44.
[12] Nonthapot, S., Srichaiyo, P. 2018. The effects of financial crises on tourism in the greater Mekong Sub-region: Panel ARDL Aproach. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 8(4):853-860.
[13] Ohen, S.B., Abang, S.O., Idiong I.C. 2007. Price transmission and market integration: vertical and horizontal price linkages for live catfish in Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural & Social Sciences, 3(3): 79-82.
[14] Panthamit. N., Chaiboonsri, C. 2020. China's outward foreign direct investment in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Journal of Economic Integration, 35 (1): 129-151.
[15] Pesaran, R., Jan, M.H., Shin, Y., and Smith, R.J. 2001. Bound testing approaches to the analysis of level relationship. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16: 289-326.
[16] Sihabutr, C., Nonthapot, S. 2021. The influences of travel expenses on the indicator factors of sustainability in GMS member countries. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 12(1): 233-242.
[17] Susanto, D., et al. 2007. Market integration and agribusiness in the North American free trade agreement: the case of fruits and vegetables. Working Paper presented at the 17th Annual World Forum and Symposium International Food and Agribusiness Management Association. In Parma, Italy.
[18] Xia, Yan, Susanto, Dwi, Rosson, Parr. 2007. Testing the market integration in regional cantaloupe and melon markets between the U.S. and Mexico: An application of error correction model. Working Paper, Presentation at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting
[19] Mekong Tourism Coordinating Office. Inbound Tourists Arrival by Region – Thailand and Laos. Available at: static.php.
[20] Ministry of Information, Culture and Tourism 2020. 2000-2019 Statistical Report on Tourism in Laos. Available at:
[21] Ministry of Tourism and Sport of Thailand. International Tourist arrivals to Thailand in 2000 – 2019. Available at:
[22] Terradialy. China, Laos to start work on high-speed rail link in 2011. Available at:
[23] The World Bank. 2020. International Tourism Receipts in Thailand and Laos 2014 – 2018. Available at:
[24] World Travel & Tourism Council. 2020. Total contribution to GDP. Available at:
How to Cite
CHUSAKUL, Wisitsiri; NONTHAPOT, Sakkarin. Travel Bubble Policy Supporting between Thailand and Laos: Evidence from Tourist Market Integration Testing. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 4, p. 948-957, june 2021. ISSN 2068-7729. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 14 aug. 2022. doi: