Evaluation of Import Substitution Potential of Products from Secondary Raw Materials of Animal Husbandry

Oxana DENISSOVA; Zhadyra KONURBAYEVA; Alfiya ZAKIMOVA; Madina RAKHIMBERDINOVA

doi:10.14505//jemt.v12.2(50).04

Oxana DENISSOVA D. Serikbayev East Kazakhstan State Technical University, Kazakhstan
Zhadyra KONURBAYEVA D. Serikbayev East Kazakhstan State Technical University, Kazakhstan
Alfiya ZAKIMOVA D. Serikbayev East Kazakhstan State Technical University, Kazakhstan
Madina RAKHIMBERDINOVA D. Serikbayev East Kazakhstan State Technical University, Kazakhstan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v12.2(50).04

Abstract

Animal husbandry is one of the main sectors of the country's economy, which can demonstrate significant results of import substitution shortly. In article dynamics of such relative indicators characterizing scales of industrial activity in the sphere of animal industries, as a share of the branch in the Kazakhstan economy and volumes of production of animal industries per capita of Kazakhstan is considered. For example, the average annual growth rate of this indicator is compared with countries with a high level of development of this industry. It was found out that the use of secondary raw materials of animal husbandry will promote the development of new industries and import substitution of both raw materials and finished products, which will attract innovative technologies in the agro-industrial complex. The article presents a step-by-step algorithm of research of the import-substituting potential of the industry, as well as its practical testing (by the example of the Republic of Kazakhstan). Volumes of production on branch "animal industries" are defined, connections of import dependence and the agrarian production made abroad are established.

References

[1] Animica, E., Animica, P. and Glumova, A. 2017. Import substitution in the industrial production of the region: conceptual theoretical and applied aspects. Regional economics, 3 (14):160-162.
[2] Baihot, L. 2018. Analysis of agricultural goods import capacity in the context of balanced foreign trade. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Agrarian Series, 4(9): 31-37.
[3] Beghin, J., Bureau, J. and Park, S. 2018. Food security and agricultural protection in South Korea. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 24(85): 618-632.
[4] Damijan, J., Kosteve, I. and Rojee, M. 2015. Bright past, shady future export performance of CEE courtiers in a comparative perspective. Post-Communist Economies, 9(27): 306-335.
[5] Denisova, N. 2016. Import substitution and food safety in the livestock industry: determinants, the regional possibilities. Bulletin of Stavropol agro-industrial complex, 2(9): 70-74.
[6] Eita, J. 2016. Estimating export potential for a small open economy using a gravity model approach: evidence from Namibia. The Journal of Developing Areas, 11(50): 273-288.
[7] Garmann, S. 2017. Does globalisation influence protectionism? Empirical evidence from agricultural support. Food Policy, 33(49): 281-293.
[8] Ghanem, H. 2015. Agriculture and rural development for inclusive growth and food security in Morocco. Global economy & development, 21(39): 19-31.
[9] Gusakova, E. 2017. Import substitution - priority goal of agro-industrial complex development. Fundamentals of economy, management and law, 6(18): 12-17.
[10] Konurbaeva, Zh. 2019. International practice of the secondary raw materials use in the branch of animal industries. Problems of agrarian market, 2(4): 138-136.
[11] Makarov, A. 2018. Import substitution as an instrument of the regional economy industrialization: the innovation aspect. Innovations, 5 (151): 90-93.
[12] Nefedova, T. 2018. Agroindustrial complex of Kazakhstan as a component of a brand of national economy. Collection of materials of scientific seminar: Marketing of the Republic of Kazakhstan: country brand. Almaty: Economics. 118.
[13] Petrov, K. and Kuznetsova, N. 2018. Problems and prospects of development of deep processing of animal production. Moscow: Eurasian Union of Scientists. 123.
[14] Popp, J., Szakály, Z., Polereczki, Z. and Oláh, J. 2016. Substitution of soybean with alternative sources of protein for feed in the EU. Hungarian Agricultural Research, 2(25): 4-9.
[15] Shagaida, N. and Uzun, V. 2018. The Agriculture and Food: Does Import Substitution Take Place? Russian Economic Developments, 7(11): 51-54.
[16] Shagaida, N., Uzun, V. and Lerman, Z. 2019. Russian agriculture: Growth and institutional challenges. Land Use Policy, 11(83): 475-487.
[17] Simachev, Yu., Kuzyk, M. and Zudin, N. 2016. Import dependence and import substitution in the Russian manufacturing industry: business view. Forsy, 4(9): 25-45.
[18] Ushacheva, I. 2017. Import substitution in the agricultural sector of Russia: problems and prospects: monograph. Moscow: FGBNU. 447.
[19] National Programme for the Development of Beef Livestock Breeding for 2018-2027. Official Internet resource of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan. www.mgov.kz
[20] Official website of the Committee on Statistics of the Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. www.stat.gov.kz
[21] Official website of the Federal State Statistics Service of the Russian Federation. www.gks.ru
[22] Official website of the State Revenue Committee of the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Foreign trade indicators. www.kgd.gov.kz
[23] Trade statistics for international business development. Trade Map service. 2019. www.trademap.org/Index.aspx/
[24] Use of meat industry waste in feed production. www.agbz.ru
[25] World Data Atlas. www.knoema.ru/atlas/