The Empirical Research of The Potential, Awareness and Current State of Agricultural Waste Use to Ensure Energy Autonomy of Agricultural Enterprises of Ukraine

  • Natalia PRYSHLIAK Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Ukraine
  • Vitaliy LUTSIAK Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Ukraine
  • Dina TOKARCHUK Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Ukraine
  • Iryna SEMCHUK Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Ukraine


Today, the issues of waste management are complex, because they relate to various aspects – resource conservation, environmental safety of mankind, ensuring competitiveness at micro, macro and mega-levels. The study is devoted to the analysis of the potential, awareness and current state of use of agricultural waste to ensure energy autonomy of agricultural enterprises of Ukraine on the basis of the experimental study, conducted by the authors using a mixed method. The main tool in the study was the survey developed by the authors, which was filled out by the owners of agricultural enterprises in Ukraine. The development of the survey was accompanied by the authors' hypotheses regarding the need for energy autonomy of agrarian enterprises; main sources of information on opportunities and state support for energy use of waste; potential and current state of bioproduction in agrarian formations. Authors acknowledged that both the crop and livestock industries lead to the generation of waste that has the potential to produce biofuels (solid – pellets, briquettes; gaseous – biogas). The study confirmed that the costs for providing agrarian enterprises themselves with fuel and energy resources in Ukraine are quite high, and the bioenergy potential of waste to replace traditional energy resources is practically not used. Further studies will cover a range of questions regarding the extension of the geography of the survey to the whole territory of Ukraine, the specification of hypotheses based on the preliminary questionnaire, the hypothesis testing and the correlation between different indicators of the agrarian waste potential for biofuel production and the efficiency of substitution of traditional energy with biofuels.


[1] Alise, M. and Teddlie, C. 2010. A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(2): 103-126. DOI:
[2] Bazeley, P. 2010. Computer assisted integration of mixed methods data sources and analyses. Handbook of mixed methods research for the social and behavioral sciences, 2: 431-467.
[3] Berezyuk, S., Tokarchuk, D. and Pryhliak, N. 2019. Resource potential of waste usage as a component of environmental and energy safety of the state. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 5(37): 1157-1167. DOI:
[4] Cameron, R. 2011. Mixed methods in business and management: a call to the first generation. Journal of Management and Organisation, 17(2): 245-267. DOI:
[5] Cameron, R., and Molina-Azorin, J. 2011.The acceptance of mixed methods in business and management. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 19(3): 256-271.
[6] Creswell, J. and Piano Clark, V. 2007. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California. 273 p.
[7] Devi, S., Gupta, C., Jat, S. L. and Parmar, M. S. 2017. Crop residue recycling for economic and environmental sustainability: The case of India. Open Agriculture, 2(1): 486-494. DOI:
[8] Geletukha, G. and Kramar, V. 2016. Comprehensive analysis of the Ukrainian biomass pellets market. Kiev.
[9] Johnson, R., Onwuegbuzie, A. and Turner, L. 2007. Toward a definition of mixed methods research, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2):112-133. DOI:
[10] Kaletnik, G. 2018. Production and Use of Biofuels. Second edition, supplemented. Vinnytsia: LLC “Nilan-Ltd”.
[11] Kaletnik, G., Lutkovska, S. Innovative environmental strategy for sustainable development. 2020. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2020, 9(2), с. 89-98. DOI:
[12] Kaletnik, H., Lutsiak, V., Melnichuk, O., Dovhan,Y., Malicki, M. Organizational basis of the development of innovative functional food products by the Ukrainian enterprises of deep walnut processing. Ukrainian Food Journal. 2019. Volume 8. Issue 1, P. 169-180. DOI:
[13] Kaletnik, H., Pryshliak, V. and Pryshliak, N. 2019. Public Policy and Biofuels: Energy, Environment and Food Trilemma. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 3(35): 479-487. DOI:
[14] Kulyk, M., Kalynychenko, O., Pryshliak, N., Pryshliak, V. 2020. Efficiency of using biomass from energy crops for sustainable bioenergy development. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 11(5), с. 1040-1053. DOI:
[15] Mertens, D. 2011. Publishing Mixed Methods Research. Journal of mixed methods research, 5(1): 3-6. DOI:
[16] Morse, M. 2010. Procedures and practice of mixed method design: Maintaining control, rigor, and complexity. SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. London: SAGE Publications: 339-52.
[17] Polonsky, M. 2001. Strategic Bridging within Firm Environmental Group Alliances: Opportunities and Pitfalls. Journal of Marketing-Theory and Practice, 9(1): 38-48. DOI:
[18] Pryshliak, N. and Tokarchuk, D. 2020. Socio-economic and environmental benefits of biofuel production development from agricultural waste in Ukraine. Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 8(1): 18–27. DOI:
[19] Pryshliak, N., Tokarchuk, D. and Palamarenko, Y. 2019. Provision of energy and environmental security of the state at the expense of biofuels from bioenergy crops and waste. Vinnytsia: Consol LLC, 336 p.
[20] Rechcigl, J., MacKinnon, H.C. 1997. Agricultural Uses of By-Products and Wastes. ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC. 19 p. Available at:
[21] Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. 2010. Epilogue: current developments and emerging trends in integrated research methodology, Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social &Behavioral Research, Sage, California, pp 803-826.
[22] Teddlie, C. and Tashakkori, A. 2010. Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 2: 1-41.
[23] Tokarchuk, D. M., Pryshliak, N. V., Tokarchuk, O. A., Mazur, K. V. Technical and economic aspects of biogas production at a small agricultural enterprise with modeling of the optimal distribution of energy resources for profits maximization. INMATEH - Agricultural Engineering, 2020. 61(2), 339-349. DOI:
[24] Tokarchuk, D.M. 2016. Investment provision of biogas production by the agricultural enterprises of Ukraine.Economy. Finances. Management. Topical Issues of Science and Practice, 12: 26–35.
[25] Tormosov, R. et al. 2015. Bioenergy projects: from idea to implementation: a practical guide, 208 p.
[26] Zulauf, C., Prutska, O., Kirieieva, E. and Pryshliak, N. 2018. Assessment of the potential for a biofuels industry in Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(4): 83-90. DOI:
[27] Analysis of the potential, awareness and current state of use of agricultural waste to ensure energy autonomy of agricultural enterprises. 2019. Online survey. Survio. Available at:
[28] The official website of the Center for Profitable Agriculture. 2007. Marketing for the Value-Added Agricultural Enterprise. Concepts, Principles and Practices for Planning, Developing and Evaluating New Market Opportunities. Available at:
[29] International Energy Agency. World Energy Model: scenario analysis of future energy trends. Available at:
How to Cite
PRYSHLIAK, Natalia et al. The Empirical Research of The Potential, Awareness and Current State of Agricultural Waste Use to Ensure Energy Autonomy of Agricultural Enterprises of Ukraine. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 7, p. 1634-1648, nov. 2020. ISSN 2068-7729. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 27 may 2022. doi: