Distinctive Role of Toxic Haze in Promoting Individual and Collective Pro-Environmental Behavior of the Youth in Thailand

  • Nittaya WONGTADA NIDA Business School National Institute of Development Administration, Thailand
  • Chirawan CHAISUWAN Chiangmai University, Thailand
  • Benjaphon KAWLABH KMIT Group Co., Ltd, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Attadech LOWAPHAP Human Touch Company Limited, Thailand

Abstract

In this paper, the authors investigated whether suddenly rising hazardous haze could raise the awareness of the youth about its danger to humans and the ecology, leading them to protect the environment. The theory of planned behavior and the Fogg behavior model was employed in this study. The online survey was administered to university students in Thailand. The authors compared the haze’s influence in the individual context, which is directly relevant to, and under the control of, the youth and in the collective context in which the youth has to rely on others to perform pro-environmental behavior. SEM techniques were used to analyze the relationship between constructs in the research model and to compare the results between the individual context and the collective context. The findings showed that, in the individual context, the fear of the consequence and the belief in the connection between the haze and environmental degradation stimulate an environmentally concerned attitude. This concern, as well as the social norm and perceived behavior control, affect intention and behavior to save the environment. However, the role of the collective context in observing the impact of haze is more complex. Social norms and perceived behavior control, as well as the perceived effect of smog and perceived connection between the haze incidence and the degradation, have to operate cohesively to persuade the youth to participate in collective activities to solve collective problems.

References

[1] Agha, S., Tollefson, D., Paul, S., Green, D., and Babigumira, J. 2019. Use of the Fogg behavior model to assess the impact of a social marketing campaign on condom use in Pakistan. Journal of Health Communication, 24: 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2019.1597952
[2] Ajzen, I. and Madden, T. J. 1986. Prediction of goal directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22: 453-474. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4
[3] Ando, K., Ohnuma, S., Blöbaum, A., Matthies, E., and Sugiura, J. 2010. Determinants of individual and collective pro-environmental behaviors: Comparing Germany and Japan. Journal of Environmental Information Science, 38(5): 21-32. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2115/44021
[4] Ateneo, S.D. 2013. Pro-environmental spillover in consumer behavior: Existence and drivers. Venice, Italy: Università Ca' Foscari Venezia. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10579/3069
[5] Audra, B., Goda, P., and Linda, S. 2019. The Relationship between people’s environmental considerations and pro-environmental behavior in Lithuania. Frontiers in Psychology, 2319, DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02319
[6] Ban, J., Zhou, L., Zhang, Y., Anderson, G., and Li, T. 2017. The health policy implications of individual adaptive behavior responses to smog pollution in urban China. Environment International, 106: 144-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.06.010
[7] Bana, J., Zhoub, L., Zhanga, Y., Andersonc, G. B., and Lia, T. 2017. The health policy implications of individual adaptive behavior responses to smog pollution in urban China. Environment international, 106: 144-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.06.010
[8] Baumgartner, H., and Homburg, C. 1996. Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2): 139-161. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0
[9] Blankenberg, A.-K., and Alhusen, H. 2019. On the determinants of pro-environmental behavior: A literature review and guide for the empirical economist. Göttingen: Discussion Papers, No. 350, University of Göttingen, Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3473702
[10] Boyle, G. (2019, April 29). Chiang Mai tourism hit by air pollution Available at: https://www.bangkokpost.com/learning/easy/1669000/chiang-mai-tourism-hit-by-air-pollution
[11] Chen, M.-F. 2016. Impact of fear appeals on pro-environmental behavior and crucial determinants. International Journal of Advertising, 35: 74-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2015.1101908
[12] Chen, S-L., Chen, J-H., and Lee, Y.H. 2018. A comparison of competing models for understanding industrial organization’s acceptance of cloud services. Sustainability, 10: 673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030673
[13] Chen, X., et al. 2011. Effects of attitudinal and socio-demographic factors on pro-environmental behavior in urban China. Environmental Conservation, 38(1): 45-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S037689291000086X
[14] Cheng, P., Wei, J., Dora, M., and Guo, X. 2017. Adoption of protective behaviours: Residents response to city smog in Hefei, China. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 25(4): 244-245, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12148
[15] Chiang Mai One. (2019, March 28). Chiang Mai establishes clean air safe zones for smog relief. Retrieved from Chiang Mai One. Available at: https://chiangmaione.com/featured/chiang-mai-establishes-clean-air-safe-zones-for-smog-relief
[16] Chin, Y.S., Pretto, L.D., Thuppil, V., and Ashfold, M.J. 2019. Public awareness and support for environmental protection—A focus on air pollution in peninsular Malaysia. PLoS ONE, 14(3): e0212206. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212206
[17] CNA. 2020, May 13. Asia Food delivery services add tonnes of plastic to Thailand’s landfills during COVID-19 crisis. Available at: http://www.tei.or.th/th/highlight_detail.php?event_id=651
[18] Coelho, F., Pereira, M.C., Cruz, L., Simões, P., and Barata, E. 2017. Affect and the adoption of pro-environmental behaviour: A structural model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54: 127-138. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.10.008
[19] Collado, S., Staats, H., and Sancho, P. 2019. Normative influences on adolescents’ self-reported pro-environmental behaviors: The role of parents and friends. Environment and Behavior, 51(3): 288–314. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517744591
[20] Côrtes, P.L., Dias, A.G., Fernandes, M.E., and Vieira, P.J. 2016. Environmental behavior: A comparative study between Brazilian and Portuguese students. Ambiente & Sociedade, 19(3): 113-134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422ASOC139099V1932016
[21] Defloor, B., and Bleys, B. 2017. Understanding pro-environmental behavior using the theory of planned behavior. 12th International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics. Budapest: Corvinus University of Budapest. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8540533
[22] DeSombre, E.R. 2018. Why Good People Do Bad Environmental Things. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN-10: 0190636270
[23] Dietrich, H.L. 2013. The role of emotion in environmental decision making. University of Nebraska. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/psychdiss/55/
[24] Doll, W., Xia, W., and Torkzadeh, G. 1994. A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4): 357–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2003.02428.x
[25] Dunlap, R.E., Liere, K.D., Mertig, A.G., and Jones, R.E. 2000. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3): 425–442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176
[26] Effendi, M.I., Sugandini, D., Sukarno, A., Kundarto M., and Arundati, R. 2020. The theory of planned behavior and pro-environmental behavior among students. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 11(1): 35-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v11.1(41).05
[27] Ertz, M., and Karakas, F.S. 2016. Exploring pro-environmental behaviors of consumers: An analysis of contextual factors, attitude, and behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 69(10): 3971–3980. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.010
[28] Ertz, M., Karakas, F., and Sarigöllü, E. 2016. Exploring pro-environmental behaviors of consumers: An analysis of contextual factors, attitude, and behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 69(10): 3971-3980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.010
[29] Farrow, K., Grolleaua, G., and Ibanez, L. 2017. Social norms and pro-environmental behavior: A review of the evidence. Ecological Economics, 140: 1-13, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017
[30] Félonneau, M.L., and Becker, M. 2008. Pro-environmental attitudes and behaviour: Revealing perceived social desirability. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 21: 25-53. Available at: https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-psychologie-sociale-2008-4-page-25.htm
[31] Fisher, W.A., Fisher, J.D., and Harman, J.J. 2009. Chapter 4. The information‐motivation‐behavioral skills model: A general social psychological approach to understanding and promoting health behavior. Suls, and K.A. Wallston (Ed.), Social Psychological Foundations of Health and Illness. MA: Blackwell. 82-106 pp. ISBN: 9780631225157
[32] Fogg, B. J. 2009. A behavior model for persuasive design, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Claremont: Association for Computing Machinery, 1-7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541999
[33] Freed, A., and Wong, D. 2019. The relationship between university students’ environmental identity, decision-making process, and behavior. The Journal of Sustainable Education, 24(3): 474-475. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1320705
[34] Fu, L., Ye Zhang, X., and Bai, Y. 2018. Pro-environmental awareness and behaviors on campus: evidence from Tianjin, China. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1): 427-445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/77953
[35] Fuller, C.M., Simmering, M.J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., and Babin, B.J. 2016. Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8): 3192-3198. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008
[36] Gefen, D., Straub, D., and Boudreau, M.C. 2000. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407
[37] Grillia, G., and J. C. 2019, December. Encouraging Pro-Environmental Behaviours: A review of methods and approaches. Available at: https://www.esri.ie/publications/encouraging-pro-environmental-behaviours-a-review-of-methods-and-approaches
[38] Groening, C., Sarkis, J., and Zhu, Q. 2018. Green marketing consumer-level theory review: A compendium of applied theories and further research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 1848-1866. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.002
[39] Gu, D., Huang, N., Zhang, M., and Wang, F. 2015. Under the dome: Air pollution, wellbeing, and pro-environmental behaviour among Beijing residents. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 9(2): 65-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2015.10
[40] Guber, D.L. 1996. Environmental concern and the dimensionality problem: A new approach to an old predicament. Social Science Quarterly, 77(3): 644-662. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42863507?seq=1
[41] Guo, Y., Yang, M., Hu, J., and Tao, L. 2016. Persuasive tech in keeping chronic patients’ willingness in health self-management. Advances in Energy, Environment and Materials Science. Guanghzou, China: CRC Press, 769-772 pp. ISBN: 978-1-138-02931-6
[42] Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., and Babin, B.J. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, 7th Edition, London: Pearson. ISBN: 0135153093
[43] Heyl, M., Moyano Díaz, E., and Cifuentes, L. 2013. Environmental attitudes and behaviors of college students: A case study conducted at a Chilean university. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 45(3): 487-500. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14349/rlp.v45i3.1489
[44] Hunter, L.M., Hatch, A., and Johnson, A. 2004. Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviors. Social Science Quarterly, 85: 677–694. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955967
[45] Isa, S.M., Lim, C.K., and Chin, P.N. 2017. Green purchase intention of laundry detergent in presence of eco-friendly brand. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 9(4): 128-143. Available at: http://www.gbmrjournal.com/vol9no4s.htm
[46] Jekria, N., and, Daud, S. 2016. Environmental concern and recycling behaviour. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35: 667-673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00082-4
[47] Jim, C.Y. 1999. The forest fires in Indonesia 1997-98: Possible causes and pervasive consequences. Geography, 84(3): 251-260. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40573309?seq=1
[48] JoLavelle, M., Rau, H., and Fahy, F. 2015. Different shades of green? Unpacking habitual and occasional pro-environmental behavior. Global Environmental Change, 35: 368-378. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.021
[49] Junior, S.S., Silva, D.d., Gabriel, M.L., and Braga, W.R. 2015. The effects of environmental concern on purchase of green products in retail. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170: 99 – 108. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.019
[50] Kaufmann, H.R., Panni, M.F., and Orphanidou, Y. 2012. Factors affecting consumers' green purchase behavior: An integrated conceptual model. Amfiteatru Economic, 14(31): 50-69. Available at: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:14:y:2012:i:31:p:50-69
[51] Kormos, C., Gifford, R., and Brown, E. 2015. The influence of descriptive social norm information on sustainable transportation behavior: A field Experiment. Environment and Behavior, 47(5): 479–501. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513520416
[52] Lai, C.K., and Cheng, E.W. 2016. Green purchase behavior of undergraduate students in Hong Kong. The Social Science Journal, 53: 67–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2015.11.003
[53] Leeuw, A.d., Valois, P., and Seixas, R. 2014. Understanding high school students’ attitude, social Norm, perceived control and beliefs to develop educational interventions on sustainable development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143: 1200 – 1209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.160
[54] Lowry, P.B., and Gaskin, J. 2014. Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: When to choose it and how to use it. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 57(2): 123-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2014.2312452
[55] Madaniyazi, L., Guo, Y., Yu, W., and Tong, S. 2014. Projecting future air pollution-related mortality under a changing climate: Progress, uncertainties and research needs. Environment International. 75: 21-32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.018
[56] Maki, A., Carrico, A.R., Raimi, K.T., Truelove, H.B., Araujo, B., and Yeung, K.L. 2019. Meta-analysis of pro-environmental behaviour spillover. Nature Sustainability, 2: 307–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0263-9
[57] Mancha, R.M., and Yoder, C.Y. 2015. Cultural antecedents of green behavioral intent: An environmental theory of planned behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43: 145-154. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.005
[58] Markle, G.L. 2013. Pro-environmental behavior: Does it matter? How it’s measured? Development and validation of the pro-environmental behavior scale (PEBS). Human Ecology, 41: 905–914. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9614-8
[59] Moser, S., and Kleinhückelkotten, S. 2018. Good intents, but low impacts: Diverging importance of motivational and socioeconomic determinants explaining pro-environmental behavior energy use, and carbon footprint. Environment and Behavior, 50(6): 626–656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517710685
[60] Nguyen, T.G. 2020. Impact of climate change and air pollution on the tourism industry: Evidence from Southeast Asia. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 10(8): 1711-1722. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v10.8(40).01
[61] Octav, I. M. 2015. Applying the theory of planned behavior in predicting pro- environmental behaviour: The case of energy conservation. Acta Universitatis Danubius, 11(4): 15-32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v8n1p127
[62] Onokala, U., Banwo, A., and Okeowo, F. 2018. Predictors of pro-environmental behavior: A comparison of university students in the United States and China. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 8: 127. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v8n1p127
[63] Oreg, S., and Katz-Gerro, T. 2006. Predicting pro environmental behavior cross-nationally: Values, the theory of planned behavior, and value-belief-model. Environment and Behavior, 38: 462-483. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505286012
[64] Patel, J., Modi, A., and Paul, J. 2017. Pro-environmental behavior and socio-demographic factors in an emerging market. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 6: 189–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-016-0071-5
[65] Poortinga, W., Steg, L., and Vlek, C. 2004. Values, environmental concern and environmental behavior: a study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 36(1): 70–93. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503251466
[66] Poškus, M.S. 2016. Using social norms to encourage sustainable behavior: A meta-analysis. Psichologija, 53: 44-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/Psichol.2016.53.10031
[67] Prachatai. 2019, March 18. Chiang Mai joins Global Climate Strike on its most polluted day. Available at: https://prachatai.com/english/node/7976
[68] Rice, G., Wongtada, N., and Leelakulthanit, O. 1996. An investigation of self-efficacy and environmentally concerned behavior of Thai consumers. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 9(2): 1-19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v09n02_01
[69] Rioux, L. 2011. Promoting pro‐environmental behaviour: Collection of used batteries by secondary school pupils. Environmental Education Research, 17(3):353 - 373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.543949
[70] Rodríguez-Ardura, I., and Meseguer-Artola, A. 2020. Editorial: How to prevent, detect and control common method variance in electronic commerce research. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762020000200101
[71] Ru, X., Qin, H., and Wang, S. 2019. Young people’s behaviour intentions towards reducing PM2.5 in China: Extending the theory of planned behaviour. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 141: 99–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.019
[72] Sachdeva, S., Boghrati, R., and Dehghani, M. 2019. Testing the influence of purity-based interventions on pro-environmental behavior. Sustainability, 11, 1811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061811
[73] Schumacker, R.E., and Lomax, R.G. 2010. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling, 3rd Edition. New York: Routledge. ISBN-13: 978-1841698915
[74] Selvefors, A., Pedersen, K.B., and Rahe, U. 2011. Design for sustainable consumption behaviour: Systematising the use of behavioural intervention strategies, Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. 1-8 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2347504.2347508
[75] Semenza, J.C., et al. 2008. Public perception and behavior change in relationship to hot weather and air pollution. Environmental Research, 107(3): 401-411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2008.03.005
[76] Shi, H., Wang, Y., Chen, J., and Huisingh, D. 2016. Preventing smog crises in China and globally, Journal of Cleaner Production 112, (2):1261-1271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.068
[77] Shin, Y.H., Im, J., Jung, S.E., and Severt, K. 2019. Motivations behind consumers' organic menu choices: The role of environmental concern, social value, and health consciousness. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 20(1): 107-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2018.1483288
[78] Souzaa, A.A., Sanches, S.P., and Ferreira, M. A. 2014. Influence of attitudes with respect to cycling on the perception of existing barriers for using this mode of transport for commuting. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 162: 111 – 120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.191
[79] Stephens, M. 2014. Applying the Fogg behavior model as a community-based social marketing approach among faculty and staff. Kansas State University: Master's thesis. Available at: https://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/handle/2097/17558
[80] Stern, P.C. 2000. New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3): 407–424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
[81] Swaim, J., Maloni, M., Napshin, S., and Henley, A. 2013. Influences on student intention and behavior toward environmental Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 124: 465-484. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1883-z
[82] Tannenbaum, M. B., et al. 2015. Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6): 1178–1204. DOI: 10.1037/a0039729
[83] The Nation. 2019, March 14. Chiang Mai tops list of world’s most polluted city for three days running. Available at: https://www.nationthailand.com/breakingnews/30365800
[84] Thøgersen, J. 1999. Spillover processes in the development of a sustainable consumption pattern. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(1):53-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(98)00043-9
[85] Thøgersen, J. and Crompton, T. 2009. Simple and painless? The limitations of spillover in environmental campaigning. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32:141-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-009-9101-1
[86] Timm, S.N., and Deal, B.M. 2016. Effective or ephemeral? The role of energy information dashboards in changing occupant energy behaviors. Energy Research & Social Science, 19: 11–20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.020
[87] Tölkes, C., and Butzmann, E. 2018. Motivating pro-sustainable behavior: The potential of green events—A case-study from the Munich. Sustainability, 10(10): 3731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103731
[88] University of Arizona 2019, October 8. Buying less is better than buying 'green' -- for the planet and your happiness. Available at: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/10/191008155716.htm
[89] Van Liere, K., and Dunlap, R.E. 1981. Environmental concern: Does it make a difference how it’s measured? Environment and Behavior, 13(6): 651–676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581136001
[90] Wanyi, R.L. 2016. Designing for Behavior Change. Berlin: Hochschule Macromedia. ISBN-13: 978-1449367626
[91] Whitmarsh, L., and O’Neill, S. 2010. Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3):305–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003
[92] Wi, A., and Chang, C.-H. 2019. Promoting pro-environmental behaviour in a community in Singapore – from raising awareness to behavioural change. Environmental Education Research, 25 (7): 1019–1037. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1528496
[93] Xiaodong, Y. 2017. Media effects on pro-environmental behavioral intention: An examination of illusion in perceived knowledge differential between self and others. Singapore: Doctoral dissertation, Nanyang Technological University. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/72687
[94] Yang, X., Chen, L., Wei, L., and Su, Q. 2020. Personal and media factors related to citizens’ pro-environmental behavioral intention against Haze in China: A moderating analysis of TPB. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7): 2314. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072314
[95] Yuriev, A., Dahmen, M., Paillé, P., Boiral, O., and Guillaumie, L. 2020. Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: A scoping review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155: 104660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104660
[96] Zhong, Q., and Shi, G. 2020. Environmental Consciousness in China: Change with Social Transformation. Kidlington: Chandos. ISBN-13: 978-0081003886
[97] Zhou, Y., and Jerrett, M. 2014. Linking exposure and health in environmental public health tracking. Environmental Research, 134: 453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.08.001
Published
2020-08-30
How to Cite
WONGTADA, Nittaya et al. Distinctive Role of Toxic Haze in Promoting Individual and Collective Pro-Environmental Behavior of the Youth in Thailand. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 5, p. 1184-1199, aug. 2020. ISSN 2068-7729. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/5475>. Date accessed: 05 nov. 2024.