Reducing the Risks of Environmental Pollution by Agents of Biological Origin
Abstract
The neutralizing ability of the mycotoxin zearalenone with the KPM-2 biological preparation was studied. Changes in the cytotoxic properties and biochemical parameters of cell cultures under the influence of zearalenone on the background of the use of the drug KPM-2 were studied. As a result of the conducted studies, it is clear that the cytotoxicity of zearalenone in the minimum dose did not differ from the control and at the maximum dose of 3*10-3 M, cell death was higher by 75% in comparison with the control. When using the drug KPM-2 in a concentration of 2*10-9 CFU/ml, the cytotoxicity of zearalenone decreased only by 44.9% in comparison with the control. When zearalenone was exposed to cell culture at a dose of 3*10-3 M, the activity of the enzyme alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased by 51.7% compared to the control group, and when using the drug KPM-2 at a concentration of 2*10-9 CFU/ml, ALT activity was higher than control by only 32.1%, respectively. The activity of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in the group with a concentration of zearalenone 3*10-3 M increased by 53.9% compared to the control group, when using the drug KPM-2, the neutralization of the toxic effect of zearalenone was observed and the AST index increased by only 44.0%. The concentration of lactic acid when exposed to zearalenone at a dose of 3 * 10-3 M decreased by 26.1%, and in the group after neutralization of zearalenone with KPM-2 in a concentration of 2*10-9 CFU/ml, the decrease in this indicator was only 16% compared to the control. The concentration of lactic acid when exposed to zearalenone at a dose of 3 * 10-3 M decreased by 26.1%, and in the group after neutralization of zearalenone with KPM-2 in a concentration of 2*10-9 CFU/ml, the decrease in this indicator was only 16% compared to the control. It is proposed to use the drug KPM-2 in the form of a suspension, which has the ability to neutralize the mycotoxin zearalenone and reduce the toxic effect on living organizations.
References
[2] Antipov, V.A., Vasiliev, V.F., Kutischeva, T.G. 2007. Mycotoxicoses - an important problem of animal husbandry. Veterinary Medicine, 11: 7-9.
[3] Bezborodova, N.A. 2009. Monitoring of mycotoxins in feed and feed raw materials and clinical and immunological features of animal mycotoxicoses in the Ural region: abstract. Diss. Cand. vet. sc. Yekaterinburg, 20 p.
[4] Chen, K.H., et al. 2014. Role of mitofusine 2 (Mfn2) in controlling cellular proliferation. FASEB J., 28: 382–394.
[5] Chulkov, D. C. 2007. Prevention of mycotoxins of animals. Veterinary science, 12: 8-10.
[6] Danicke, S. 2004. Prevention and control of mycotoxins in the poultry production chain: a European view. S. Danicke. Worlds Poultry Science Journal, 58(4): 451-474.
[7] Diakonov, L.P. 2009. Animal cell in culture (Methods and application in biotechnology). M.: Sputnik
[8] Diaz, D. 2006. Mycotoxins and mycotoxicoses. M.: Pechatny Gorod, 376 p.
[9] Dominov, R.R. 2003. Application of the enterosorbent "POLYSORB VP" in poultry farming. Bio, 4: 7-9.
[10] Dorozhkin, V.I., and Ivanov, A.V. 2010. Methodological recommendations for the prevention of mycotoxicosis in animals. Moscow, 114 p.
[11] Fink-Gremmels, J. 1999. Mycotoxins their implication for human and animal health. Veterinary Quatery, 21: 115-120.
[12] Fisinin, V.I. 2006. Guidelines for rationing poultry feeding; eds. Fisinina, S.A. Imangulova, I.A. Egorova, T.M. Okolelova / VNITIP. - Sergiev Posad, 65 p. (in Russian)
[13] Freshney, R.J. 2010. Culture of animal cells 5th ed. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York. 691 p.
[14] Gajecka, M. 2007. Histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations, and changes in proliferation activity of the uterus in bitches following zearalenon micotoxicosis. Pol. J Vet Sci., 10(3): 143-51.
[15] Gareis, M. et al. 1989. Contamination of cereals and feed with Fusarium mycotoxins in European countries. Fusarium mycotoxins. Path ”Seminar in Warsaw, Sept., 1987”, 540-543.
[16] Grenier, B., and Applegate, T.J. 2013. Modulation of Intestinal Function Following Mycotoxin Ingestion: Meta-Analysis of Published Experiments in Animals. Toxins, 5(2): 396-430.
[17] Idiatov I.I. et al. 2017. Cytotoxic activity of T-2 toxin for a cattle of immortalized fetal lung epithelium cells. Genes and Cells, 12(1): 41-46.
[18] Krska, R. et al. 2012. Guide to Mycotoxins featuring Mycotoxin Risk Management in Animal Production. BIOMIN edition.
[19] Lemmens, M. 2016. Mycotoxin Summer Academy – Module 1. IFA Tulln.
[20] Mabbett, T. 1999. Mycotoxin threat. Feeding times, 4(3): 4-6.
[21] Marin, S. et al. 2013. Mycotoxins: Occurrence, toxicology, and exposure assessment. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 60: 218-237.
[22] Martinelli, J.A., Federizzi, L.C. and Benedetti, A.C. 1994. Redução no rendimento de grãos de aveia em função da severidade da ferrugem da folha. p.116-118.
[23] McKenzie, K.S. et al. 1999. Assessment of the estrogenic effects of zearalenone after treatment with ozone utilizing the mouse uterine weight bioassay. J Toxicol Environ Health A., 56(4): 283-95.
[24] Moule, Y. 1985. Biochemical effects of mycotoxins. Mycotoxins - production, isolation, separation and purification. Toxicology Letters, 6: 37-44.
[25] Muschen, H. and Frank, K.1994. Mycotoxins in oilseeds and risks in animal production. Moulds, Mycotoxins, and Food Preservatives in the Food Industry. Parsippany, New Jersey, BASF Corporation, p. 31-35.
[26] Nabatov, A.A., Raginov I.S. 2015. The DC-SIGN-CD56 interaction inhibits the anti-dendritic cell cytotoxicity of CD56 expressing cells. J Infectious Agents and Cancer, 10. DOI: 10.1186/s13027-015-0043-8
[27] Papazyan, T.T. 2002. Mycotoxines: economic risk and control. Animal husbandry of Russia, 7: 16-18.
[28] Semenov E.I. et al. 2018. Systematic anaphylaxis due to combined mycotoxicosis in wister rats. Indian Veterinary Journal, 95(6): 16-19.
[29] Tiemann, U. et al. 2003. Effects of the mycotoxins α- and β-zearalenol on regulation of progesterone synthesis in cultured cells from porcine ovaries. Reproductive Toxicology, 17: 673 – 81.
[30] Tkachev, A.V., and Tkacheva, O.L. 2017. Comparison of the cytotoxic effects of zearalenon and t-2 toxin on the horses and oxen germ cell in vitro before and after cryopreservation. Tsitologiia, 59(1): 45-52.
[31] Towers, N.R., Sporsen, M., Webber, W. 1995. Zearalenone metabolites in cycling and non-cycling cows. In: Toxinology and Food Safety Research Report, (L.L. Garthwaite, ed). Ruakura Research Center, Hamilton, New Zealand, P. 46-47.
[32] Tremasov, M.Ya. 2012. About the causes of mass mycotoxicosis of animals. Materials of International Mycological Forum, 1: 192-193.
[33] Valiullin L.R. et al. 2018. Study of changes in biochemical parameters of cell cultures when exposed to t-2 toxin. Scientific notes of the Kazan State Academy of Veterinary Medicine n.a. N.E. Bauman, 236(4): 39-43.
[34] Valiullin, L.R. et al. 2014. Reducing the risks of contamination of food raw materials with fungi of the aspergillus genus and their metabolites. Advances in Medical Mycology, 13: 355-356.
[35] Zinedine, A. et al. 2007. Review on the toxicity, occurrence, metabolism, detoxification, regulations and intake of zearalenone: An estrogenic mycotoxin. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 25: 1-18.
Copyright© 2024 The Author(s). Published by ASERS Publishing 2024. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of CC-BY 4.0 license.