Analysis on Willingness to Pay at the Ecotourism Destination, Cigamea Waterfall, Halimun-Salak National Reserve

Aris MUNANDAR; Andi GUNAWAN; Ghoitsa Rohmah NURAZIZAH; Andrianto KUSUMOARTO

doi:10.14505//jemt.11.2(42).19

Aris MUNANDAR Institut Pertanian Bogor University - IPB, Indonesia
Andi GUNAWAN Institut Pertanian Bogor University - IPB, Indonesia
Ghoitsa Rohmah NURAZIZAH Indonesia University of Education - UPI, Indonesia
Andrianto KUSUMOARTO University of Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.11.2(42).19

Abstract

Cigamea Waterfall is one of the ecotourism destinations situated in area of Salak Resort II of Halimun-Salak National Reserve (HSNR) Indonesia that can be partialy developed. The area consists of sub montanes forest and montane forest categorized as humid tropical forest. The uniqueness and the beauty of the flora, fauna, natural phenomena, and the natural condition become attraction for people to visit the area and willingness to pay for contribution fee. This fee is used as management funding to preserve the area. A demand for a commodity is trigered by willingness affordibility in buying that commodity (willingness to pay). The research analyzed willingness to pay by visitors to enjoy the beauty of Cigamea Waterfall. Logit method with descriptive quantitative approach was used in this study. Several stages in this study included: (1) analysing visitors’ trend; (2) analysing respondents’logit regression towards willingness to pay (WTP); (3) analysing willingness to pay. During this research, this ecosystem may be the last home for Leopard which stated vulnerable (VU) by REDLIST of IUCN and may be the last home for other endangered (EN) species. Based on the analysis on the responses of 342 respondents concerning their willingness to pay for contribution, 202 of the (59,1%) were willing to pay while the rest 140 respondents (48,9%) refused to pay. The average value of willingness to pay obtained was 15.000 IDR (1 USD = 14.000 IDR per year 2016) paid to enjoy the beauty of Salak Resort II, HSNR. This value was higher than that of the ticket per ecotourism object charged by the management of the resort averaging 7.500 IDR. Based on respondents’ willingness to pay, the average of the willingness to pay to enjoy the Cigamea waterfall ecotourism object was 14.000 IDR. The Willingness to pay to get into Cigamea Waterfall was lower than that for entering Salak Resort II, HSNR. Visitors willingness to visit Cigamea Waterfall ecoturism object due to the existence of forest and some natural phenomena, river as ecological corridors of the area, easy access through trekking path corridors in the forest margin (edges) as well as the potential of the flora and the fauna. The potential value of Cigamea Waterfall was 3,66 (out of 1 to 7 scale of Guideline of Ministry of Forestry), that of the flora was 2,48, while value of the fauna was 3,29. This also support claims toward a new paradigm of value that ecosystem is not only treated as supply depot of resources but also treated as oikos (home for us and other living organism).

References

[1] Biagio G.F., et al. 2019. Howard Odum’s “Self-organization, transformity and information”: Three decades of empirical evidence. Ecological Modelling, 407(1): 108717. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.06.005
[2] Buchsbaum, B.D. 2004. Ecotourism and Sustainable Development in Costa Rica. Virginia Polytenic and State University. USA.
[3] Chok, S., Macbeth, J. and Warren, C. 2007. Tourism as a tool for poverty alleviation: A critical analysis of ‘pro-poor tourism’and implications for sustainability. Current issues in Tourism, 10(2-3): 144-165. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2167/cit303
[4] Darsoprayitno, S. 2002. Tourism Ecology: Management of Ecotourism. Bandung: Angkasa Publisher. 491 hal. (In Indonesian)
[5] Fauzi, A. 2014. Economic Valuation of Natural Resource and Environmental Damage. Bogor (ID): IPB Press. (In Indonesian)
[6] Fernández, J.I.P., and Sánchez Y.L. 2016. Are Tourists Really Willing To Pay More for Sustainable Destinations? Sustainability, 8(11): 1-20.
[7] Forman, R.T.T., and Godron M. 1986. Landscape Ecology. First Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[8] Gkoumas, A. 2019. Evaluating a standard for sustainable tourism through the lenses oflocal industry. Heliyon, 5: 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02707
[9] Goodwin, H. 1996. In pursuit of ecotourism. Biodiversity & Conservation, 5(3): 277-291. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051774
[10] Iranah, P., et al. 2018. Valuing visitor access to forested areas and exploring willingness to pay for forest conservation and restoration finance: The case of small island developing state of Mauritius. Journal of Environmental Management, 223(1): 868-877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.008
[11] Kiss, A. 2004. Is community-based ecotourism a good use of biodiversity conservation funds? Trends in ecology & evolution, 19(5): 232-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.010
[12] Kusumoarto, A., Gunawan, A. and Nurazizah, G.R. 2017. Landscape Potential Analysis for Ecotourism Destination in the Resort Ii Salak Mountain, Halimun-Salak National Park. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 91(1): 012029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/91/1/012029
[13] Kusumoarto, A., R. Ramadhan. 2016. Ecotourism and Suitability Evaluation of the Mount Salak Resort II in the Halimun-Salak National Park P 573-579 In Radzi et al. (ed). Heritage, Culture and Society. London: Taylor &Francis Group 831 p.
[14] Lordkipanidze, M., Brezet, H. and Backman, M. 2005. The entrepreneurship factor in sustainable tourism development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(8): 787-798. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.043
[15] Mitchell, R.E., and Reid, D.G. 2001. Community integration: Island tourism in Peru. Annals of tourism research, 28(1): 113-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(00)00013-X
[16] Nasir 2003. Survey on Flora and Fauna of Gunung Salak Halimun National Park. Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis. Bogor, Indonesia.
[17] Ross, S., and Wall, G. 1999. Ecotourism: towards congruence between theory and practice. Tourism management, 20(1): 123-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00098-3
[18] Scheyvens, R. 1999. Ecotourism and the empowerment of local communities. Tourism management, 20(2): 245-249.
[19] Sirakaya, E., Sasidharan, V. and Sönmez, S. 1999. Redefining ecotourism: The need for a supply-side view. Journal of Travel Research, 38(2): 168-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759903800210
[20] Valentine, P.S. 1993. Ecotourism and nature conservation: A definition with some recent developments in Micronesia. Tourism management, 14(2): 107-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5177(93)90043-K
[21] Vallecillo, S. et al. 2019. Ecosystem services accounts: Valuing the actual flow of nature-based recreation from ecosystems to people. Ecological Modelling, 392(24): 196-211. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.09.023
[22] Vorderman 1885. A historical note of Salak Mountain during colonial era. http://beritabogor.com/amp/gunung-salak/.
[23] Wunder, S. 2000. Ecotourism and economic incentives—an empirical approach. Ecological economics, 32(3): 465-479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00119-6
[24] Yan, J., Barkmann, J. and Marggraf, R. 2007. Chinese tourists preferences for nature based destinations – a choice experiment analysis. Department of Agriculture Economics and Rural Development, Georg-August University Göttingen. 44 p.
[25] [HSNR] Halimun Salak National Reserve. 2012. Site Design of Halimun Salak National Park Tourism Management. 130 p. In Indonesian Language
[26] Directorate General for Forest and Nature Conservation [Ditjen PHKA]. 2003. Evaluation of Ecotourism Attractiveness (ADO-ODTWA). Ministry of Forestry. Jakarta. (In Indonesian)