Tourists’ Preferences for Preservation of World Heritage Site Stadthuys, Malacca

Kamaludin MAHIRAH; Faizah Haron NAZATUL; Azrin Shah Razali MOHD

doi:10.14505//jemt.v11.2(42).06

Kamaludin MAHIRAH Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Development University of Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia
Faizah Haron NAZATUL Faculty of Business and Management Sultan Zainal Abidin University, Malaysia
Azrin Shah Razali MOHD Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Development University of Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v11.2(42).06

Abstract

Preservation of historical buildings and sites is vital to uphold and conserve a nation’s history and heritage. The importance of preservation works on historical buildings and sites in Malaysia towards its tourism industry can be considered as vague, hence the benefit and values of preservation work is still ambiguous. This study estimates willingness to pay (WTP) of domestic tourists for the preservation of UNESCO World Heritage Site (WHS) Stadthuys, Malacca, Malaysia. This study applied Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) through questionnaires which have been distributed to 100 domestic tourists. The results of the CVM were one of the appropriate techniques to estimate the economic value of the cultural and historical preservation works. On average, respondents were willing to pay approximately RM 8.82 for the preservation of the Stadthuys, in which this value was higher than the current fee, RM5. It demonstrated that visitors were willing to contribute in any preservation efforts of the site and the allocation of money can be used as maintenance cost of the heritage. Public involvement in tourism services demonstrates positive influences on protection of cultural heritage and development of local communities too. The originality of this paper is presented how the field of economic valuation denotes to calculate value for sustainable tourism in world heritage sites.

References

[1] Ariffin, N. F. M., Yahaya, A., and Anuar, A. 2015. "Stakeholders’ attitude on the willingness-to-pay value for the conservation of the George Town, Penang World heritage site." Journal of Surveying, Construction and Property, 6(1): 1-10.
[2] Boyle, K. J., MacDonald, H. F., Cheng, H. and McCollum, D. W. 1998. Bid design and yea saying in single-bounded, dichotomous-choice questions. Land economics: 49-64.
[3] Cameron, T. A., and Huppert, D.D. 1989. OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data. Journal of environmental economics and management, 17(3): 230-246.
[4] Cameron, T. A. 1988. A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression. Journal of environmental economics and management 15(3): 355-379.
[5] Chan, E., Yiu, C. Y., Baldwin, A. and Lee, G. 2009. "Value of buildings with design features for healthy living: a contingent valuation approach." Facilities.
[6] Chiam, C. C. 2013. Economic Valuation of Conservation of Living Heritage in Melaka City, Malaysia. PhD diss., Universiti Putra Malaysia.
[7] Durán, R., Farizo, B.A. and Vázquez, M. X. 2015. Conservation of maritime cultural heritage: A discrete choice experiment in a European Atlantic Region. Marine Policy, 51: 356-365.
[8] Freeman III, A. M., Herriges, J.A. and Kling, C. L. 2014. The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. Routledge.
[9] Hanley, N., and Spash, C.L. 1993. Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation. No. 93/12.
[10] Huh, Chang, and Vogt, C.A. 2008. Changes in residents' attitudes toward tourism over time: A cohort analytical approach. Journal of Travel Research 46(4): 446-455.
[11] ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites). World Report 2002/2003. Monuments and Sites. Available at: https://www.icomos.org/risk/
[12] Ivehammar, P. 2009. The payment vehicle used in CV studies of environmental goods does matter. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 34: 450-463.
[13] Ji, Shuyun, Choi, Y., Lee, C.-K., and Mjelde, J. W. 2018. Comparing willingness-to-pay between residents and non-residents using a contingent valuation method: case of the Grand Canal in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 23(1): 79-91.
[14] Lee, C.-K., Kim, T.-K., and Mjelde, J.W. 2016. Comparison of preservation values between Internet and interview survey modes: the case of Dokdo, South Korea. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 59(1): 22-43.
[15] Liu, J., et al. 2019. Evaluation of the non-use value of beach tourism resources: A case study of Qingdao coastal scenic area, China. Ocean & coastal management, 168: 63-71.
[16] Mitchell, R. C., and Carson, R.T. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Rff Press.
[17] Mourato, S., and Mazzanti, M. 2002. Economic valuation of cultural heritage: evidence and prospects. Research Report. The Getty Conservation Institute.
[18] Navrud, S., and Ready, R.C. 2002. Valuing cultural heritage: Applying environmental valuation techniques to historic buildings, monuments and artifacts. Edward Elgar Publishing.
[19] O’Garra, T. 2009. Bequest values for marine resources: how important for indigenous communities in less-developed economies. Environmental and resource economics, 44(2): 179.
[20] Rasoolimanesh, S. M. et al. 2017. Community participation in World Heritage Site conservation and tourism development. Tourism Management, 58: 142-153.
[21] UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 2019. Available at: http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1223