Conceptual Framework to Improve Carbon Performance via Carbon Strategies and Carbon Accounting
Rapid transformation from agriculture to industrialized economy in Malaysia has evidently attributed to the accelerated increase in carbon emissions. Carbon emission growth that led to climate change is a very complex spectacle and that is when carbon accounting has emerged. The emergence of carbon accounting has assisted and motivates organizations in achieving their carbon reduction objectives because the system is considered essential in combating climate change. Despite that, the accounting methodology used for climate change remains poorly understood in the current business sphere. As such, it is argued that if carbon strategy is deliberated properly by an organization, carbon accounting will effectively outlines the effects on carbon performance. Enhancing profits is the focal point, but the focus on the sustainable development of the business in the future is crucial. This paper discusses interlinks of corporate carbon strategies, carbon accounting and carbon performance of organizations in Malaysia.
 Andrew, J., and Cortese, C. 2011. Accounting for climate change and the self-regulation of carbon disclosures. Accounting Forum, 35(3): 130–138. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2011.06.006
 Bakar, N. A., Abdullah, H., Ibrahim, F. W., and Jali, M. R. M. 2017. Green economy: Evaluation of Malaysian company environmental sustainability. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(2): 139–143.
 Begum, R.A 2017. Tackling Climate Change and Malaysia's Emission Reduction Target. Available at: http://magazine.scientificmalaysian.com/issue-13-2017/tackling-climate-change-malaysias-emission-reduction-target/
 Burritt, R. L., and Tingey-Holyoak, J. 2012. Forging cleaner production: The importance of academic-practitioner links for successful sustainability embedded carbon accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 36: 39–47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.001
 Cadez, S., and Guilding, C. 2017. Examining distinct carbon cost structures and climate change abatement strategies in CO2polluting firms. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(5): 1041–1064. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2015-2009
 Cadez, S., and Guilding, C. 2012. Strategy , strategic management accounting and performance: a configurational analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(3): 484–501. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571211210086
 Damert, M., Paul, A., and Baumgartner, R. J. 2017. Exploring the determinants and long-term performance outcomes of corporate carbon strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 160: 123–138. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.206
 Daud, Z. M., Mohamed, N., and Abas, N. 2015. Public knowledge of climate change : Malaysia ’ s perspective. International Conference on Human Capital and Knowledge Management.
 Gallego-Álvarez, I., Rodríguez-Domínguez, L., and García-Sánchez, I. M. 2011. Study of some explanatory factors in the opportunities arising from climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(9–10): 912–926. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.02.012
 Gibassier, D., and Schaltegger, S. 2015. Carbon management accounting and reporting in practice. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(3): 340–365. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2015-0014
 Hart, S. L., and Dowell, G. 2011. A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5): 1464–1479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219
 Kasbun, N. F., Teh, B. H., and Ong, T. S. 2016. Sustainability reporting and financial performance of Malaysian public listed companies. Institutions and Economies, 8(4).
 Lewandowski, S. 2017. Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance: The Role of Emission Reductions. Business Strategy and Environment. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1978
 Lohmann, L. 2009. Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: The cases of carbon and cost-benefit. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3–4): 499–534. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.03.002
 Luo, L., and Tang, Q. 2014. Does voluntary carbon disclosure reflect underlying carbon performance? Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 10(3): 191–205. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2014.08.003
 Luo, L., and Tang, Q. 2016. Determinants of the Quality of Corporate Carbon Management Systems: An International Study. International Journal of Accounting, 51(2): 275–305. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2016.04.007
 Ong, T., Teh, B., Goh, H., and Thai, S. 2015) ISO 14001 Certification and Financial Performance of Companies. Asia Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 10(2): 58–77.
 Ong, T. S., Heng Teh, B., Ng, S. H., and Soh, W. N. 2016. Environmental Management System and Financial Performance. Institutions and Economies, 8(2): 26–52.
 Ong, T. S., Magsi, H. B., and Burgess, T. F. 2019. Organisational Culture , Environmental Management Control Systems , Environmental Performance of Pakistani Manufacturing Industry. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, (1741-0401). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-05-2018-0187
 Perego, P., and Hartmann, F. 2009. Aligning Performance Measurement Systems With Strategy : The Case of Environmental Strategy, 45(4): 397–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00297.x
 Phan, T. N., Baird, K., and Su, S. 2017. The use and effectiveness of environmental management accounting. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 24(4): 355–374. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2017.1354235
 Saka, C., and Oshika, T. 2014. Disclosure effects, carbon emissions and corporate value. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5(1): 22–45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2012-0030
 Schaltegger, S., and Csutora, M. 2012. Carbon accounting for sustainability and management. Status quo and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 36: 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.024
 Schaltegger, S., Gibassier, D., and Zvezdov, D. 2013. Is environmental management accounting a discipline? A bibliometric literature review. Meditary Accountancy Research, 21(1): 4–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2012-0039
 Tang, Q. 2017. Framework for and the Role of Carbon Accounting in Corporate Carbon Management Systems: A Holistic Approach. Ssrn, 1–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2903366
 Toms, S. 2010. Value, Profit and Risk: Accounting and The Resource-Based View of the Firm. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(5): 647–670. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571011054927
 Wahyuni, D., and Ratnatunga, J. 2015. Carbon strategies and management practices in an uncertain carbonomic environment - Lessons learned from the coal-face. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96: 397–406. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.095
 Wijethilake, C., Munir, R., and Appuhami, R. 2016. Environmental Innovation Strategy and Organizational Performance: Enabling and Controlling Uses of Management Control Systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3259-7
 Wolff, E., et al. 2014. Climate Change Evidence & Causes. National Acedemy of Sciences, 36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17226/18730
 *** World Economic Forum. 2017. The Global Risks Report 2017 12th Edition. Insight Report.
***Yale University. 2018. 2018 Environmental Performance Index. DOI:https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34995.12328
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.