Criteria for Auditing the Efficiency of Natural Resource Use. Example of the Karaganda Region
Abstract
The limited reserves of many natural resources, as well as their irrational use, poses an urgent problem of increasing the efficiency of their use by conducting a proper environmental audit. The article discusses the criteria for the audit of the effectiveness of the use of natural resources in international practice, as well as the adaptation of these criteria to the practice of conducting a state environmental audit in the Republic of Kazakhstan (on the example of industry in the Karaganda region). The article also considers the environmental and economic criteria for the efficiency of natural resource use, as well as the interrelation of these criteria by the method of correlation of indicators.
References
[1] Abramenkov, V.T. 1996. Environmental problems of the Karaganda region and methods for their solution. In: Modern problems of ecology of Central Kazakhstan. Karaganda.
[2] Astakhov, A. S. 2010. Natural resources and national wealth [Electronic resource]: monograph. Moscow: Energy, Institute for Energy Strategy. Available at: http://www.iprbookshop.ru/4298.html
[3] Baykin, A.K. 2017. Analysis of the socio-economic development of the regions of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of Karaganda State University named after E.A. Buketov 2: 84–86.
[4] Beisenova, L.Z., Hurkhalieva, D.M. and Sembieva, L. M. 2012. About the system of state audit and financial control in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of KarSU. Karaganda: 37–41.
[5] Botasheva, Z. R. 2007. Ecological audit as a form of environmental incentives. Ecological Bulletin of the Rostov State University, 5 (2): 56–59.
[6] Bulletin on the state of the environment of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2013-2017. Available at: https://kazhydromet.kz/ru/bulleten/okrsreda
[7] Chkhutnashvili, L.V. 2015. Ecological audit in the system of state environmental supervision. Theory of accounting and analytical processes, 6: 58–63.
[8] Chkhutnashvili, L.V. 2018. Theory and Organization of Environmental Audit: Monograph. Moscow: INFRA-M.
[9] Dugalova, G. N., and D.T. Abenova. 2005. Sustainable development of the regional economy: the essence, indicators and factors. Bulletin of the Kazakh Economic University named after T. Ryskulov, 5: 238–243.
[10] Dusembaeva, N. 2015. Hygienic and environmental aspects of the city of Balkhash. Occupational health and medical ecology, 4(49): 62–68.
[11] Ebisemiju, F.S. 1993. Environmental Impact Assessment: Making it Work in Developing Countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 8 (4): 247–273. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jema.1993.1044
[12] Four Approaches for a Customized Environmental Auditing Program, Courtesy of AnteaGroup. 2016. USA.
[13] Holodov, P.P. 2010. Economic efficiency of using natural potential. Bulletin of the Kuzbass State Technical University, 4: 136–137.
[14] Janburchin, K. E. 2018. Theory of state audit. Astana: Accounts Committee for Control over Execution of the Republican Budget.
[15] Kenzhebekov, N. 2012. Priorities for the development of industry in the Karaganda region. Bulletin of the Shevchenko Kiev National University, 143: 37–40.
[16] Markevičius, A., Katinas, V., Perednis, E. and Tamašauskienė, M. 2010. Trends and sustainability criteria of the production and use of liquid biofuels. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 14(9): 3226–3231. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.015
[17] Methodological guide for conducting an audit of environmental performance in the light of international experience: approved by order of the Chairman of the Accounts Committee for Monitoring the Implementation of the Republican Budget from November 28, 2017. No. 168-n/k. Astana.
[18] Pavlovskaia, E. 2014. Sustainability criteria: their indicators, control, and monitoring (with examples from the biofuel sector). Environmental Sciences Europe, 26(1): 17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-014-0017-2
[19] Pearson Correlation Criterion. 2017. Available at: http://medstatistic.ru/theory/pirson.html
[20] Petrov, A. V., and Razumovskaya, I. V. 2016. Natural resources as an object of environmental management. Economy and ecology of territorial entities, 2: 36–40.
[21] Sangita, P. I. 2012. Environmental auditing: its benefits and counterance. International Journal of science innovation and discoveries,2 (5): 152–156.
[22] Santa, U., Bancher, M., Demattio, M., and Klammsteiner, U. 2019. The CasaClima building assessment scheme: A key to design and construction quality, energy efficiency, and sustainability. ce papers, 3: 182–188. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.965
[23] Sari, D.A., Sayer, J., Margules, Ch., and Boedhihartono, A.K. 2019. Determining the effectiveness of forest landscape governance: A case study from the Sendang landscape. South Sumatra. Forest Policy and Economics, 102: 17-28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.014
[24] Sharipov, A.K. 2012. Problems of development of environmental auditing in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Young scientist, 5: 257–260.
[25] Vovere, L., and Buģina, V. 2010. Methods of economic assessment of natural resources. Economic science for rural development. Latvia, 22, 82–89. Available at: https://dukonference.lv/files/proceedings_of_conf/53konf/ekonomika/Vovere_Bugina.pdf
[26] Zhironkin, S., et al. 2019. Neo-Industrial Structural Shifts in Sustainable Development Methodology. E3S Web Conf., IVth International Innovative Mining Symposium, 105. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201910504001
[27] Zutshi, A., and Sohal, A.S. Environmental management systems auditing: auditors experiences in Australia. Nternational. Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 2002, 1 (1): 73–87. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900310495133
[28] *** Kazakhstan in numbers: statistical compilation. Astana: Committee on Statistics of the Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2017.
[29] *** The magnitude and strength of the correlation coefficient. 2018. https://statpsy.ru/correlation/velicina/
[2] Astakhov, A. S. 2010. Natural resources and national wealth [Electronic resource]: monograph. Moscow: Energy, Institute for Energy Strategy. Available at: http://www.iprbookshop.ru/4298.html
[3] Baykin, A.K. 2017. Analysis of the socio-economic development of the regions of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of Karaganda State University named after E.A. Buketov 2: 84–86.
[4] Beisenova, L.Z., Hurkhalieva, D.M. and Sembieva, L. M. 2012. About the system of state audit and financial control in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of KarSU. Karaganda: 37–41.
[5] Botasheva, Z. R. 2007. Ecological audit as a form of environmental incentives. Ecological Bulletin of the Rostov State University, 5 (2): 56–59.
[6] Bulletin on the state of the environment of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2013-2017. Available at: https://kazhydromet.kz/ru/bulleten/okrsreda
[7] Chkhutnashvili, L.V. 2015. Ecological audit in the system of state environmental supervision. Theory of accounting and analytical processes, 6: 58–63.
[8] Chkhutnashvili, L.V. 2018. Theory and Organization of Environmental Audit: Monograph. Moscow: INFRA-M.
[9] Dugalova, G. N., and D.T. Abenova. 2005. Sustainable development of the regional economy: the essence, indicators and factors. Bulletin of the Kazakh Economic University named after T. Ryskulov, 5: 238–243.
[10] Dusembaeva, N. 2015. Hygienic and environmental aspects of the city of Balkhash. Occupational health and medical ecology, 4(49): 62–68.
[11] Ebisemiju, F.S. 1993. Environmental Impact Assessment: Making it Work in Developing Countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 8 (4): 247–273. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jema.1993.1044
[12] Four Approaches for a Customized Environmental Auditing Program, Courtesy of AnteaGroup. 2016. USA.
[13] Holodov, P.P. 2010. Economic efficiency of using natural potential. Bulletin of the Kuzbass State Technical University, 4: 136–137.
[14] Janburchin, K. E. 2018. Theory of state audit. Astana: Accounts Committee for Control over Execution of the Republican Budget.
[15] Kenzhebekov, N. 2012. Priorities for the development of industry in the Karaganda region. Bulletin of the Shevchenko Kiev National University, 143: 37–40.
[16] Markevičius, A., Katinas, V., Perednis, E. and Tamašauskienė, M. 2010. Trends and sustainability criteria of the production and use of liquid biofuels. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 14(9): 3226–3231. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.015
[17] Methodological guide for conducting an audit of environmental performance in the light of international experience: approved by order of the Chairman of the Accounts Committee for Monitoring the Implementation of the Republican Budget from November 28, 2017. No. 168-n/k. Astana.
[18] Pavlovskaia, E. 2014. Sustainability criteria: their indicators, control, and monitoring (with examples from the biofuel sector). Environmental Sciences Europe, 26(1): 17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-014-0017-2
[19] Pearson Correlation Criterion. 2017. Available at: http://medstatistic.ru/theory/pirson.html
[20] Petrov, A. V., and Razumovskaya, I. V. 2016. Natural resources as an object of environmental management. Economy and ecology of territorial entities, 2: 36–40.
[21] Sangita, P. I. 2012. Environmental auditing: its benefits and counterance. International Journal of science innovation and discoveries,2 (5): 152–156.
[22] Santa, U., Bancher, M., Demattio, M., and Klammsteiner, U. 2019. The CasaClima building assessment scheme: A key to design and construction quality, energy efficiency, and sustainability. ce papers, 3: 182–188. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.965
[23] Sari, D.A., Sayer, J., Margules, Ch., and Boedhihartono, A.K. 2019. Determining the effectiveness of forest landscape governance: A case study from the Sendang landscape. South Sumatra. Forest Policy and Economics, 102: 17-28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.014
[24] Sharipov, A.K. 2012. Problems of development of environmental auditing in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Young scientist, 5: 257–260.
[25] Vovere, L., and Buģina, V. 2010. Methods of economic assessment of natural resources. Economic science for rural development. Latvia, 22, 82–89. Available at: https://dukonference.lv/files/proceedings_of_conf/53konf/ekonomika/Vovere_Bugina.pdf
[26] Zhironkin, S., et al. 2019. Neo-Industrial Structural Shifts in Sustainable Development Methodology. E3S Web Conf., IVth International Innovative Mining Symposium, 105. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201910504001
[27] Zutshi, A., and Sohal, A.S. Environmental management systems auditing: auditors experiences in Australia. Nternational. Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 2002, 1 (1): 73–87. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900310495133
[28] *** Kazakhstan in numbers: statistical compilation. Astana: Committee on Statistics of the Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2017.
[29] *** The magnitude and strength of the correlation coefficient. 2018. https://statpsy.ru/correlation/velicina/
Published
2020-01-25
How to Cite
ZHUPYSHEVA, Aktoty Oiratovna et al.
Criteria for Auditing the Efficiency of Natural Resource Use. Example of the Karaganda Region.
Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 7, p. 1466-1477, jan. 2020.
ISSN 2068-7729.
Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/4268>. Date accessed: 04 nov. 2024.
doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v10.7(39).04.
Section
Article
Copyright© 2024 The Author(s). Published by ASERS Publishing 2024. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of CC-BY 4.0 license.