Social and Environmental Mechanisms of Management in Agri-Business

  • Oleg M. BARBAKOV Department of Business Informatics and Mathematics Industrial University of Tyumen, Russian Federation
  • Galina A. GERASIMOVA Department of Marketing and Public Administration Industrial University of Tyumen, Russian Federation
  • Dmitry A. PEZIN Department of Marketing and Public Administration Industrial University of Tyumen, Russian Federation

Abstract

Existing technologies and technological processes in production areas in the overwhelming majority are open systems in which natural resources are inefficiently used and significant waste is generated. Irrational water use and environmental degradation in traditional irrigation zones necessitate an analysis of the problems of environmental assessment and the applicability of irrigation systems, which makes this study relevant. The article aims to develop a methodology for assessing the technological process in agrolandscape systems from the point of view of resource conservation, ensuring strict regulation of environmentally friendly and waste-free technology and technological schemes for irrigating crops. The main principles of non-waste production process technologies are used. On the basis of them, a system of integral criteria for assessing the environmental reliability of irrigation technology and irrigation systems is presented, which allows creating an environmentally safe resource-saving technological process in agrolandscape systems. It was concluded that the task of managing the agro-industrial complex should be the creation of environmentally sustainable agricultural landscapes. The results of the study can be the basis for the formation of sustainable management decisions in the management of the agro-industrial complex from the standpoint of resource saving.

References

[1] Aleknavičius, A. and Aleknavičius, M. 2017. Theoretical and methodical aspects of agrarian territories planning. Public Policy and Administration, 16(2): 198-211.
[2] Angelstam, P., Elbakidze, M., Axelsson, R., Dixelius, M. and Törnblom, J. 2013. Knowledge production and learning for sustainable landscapes: seven steps using social-ecological systems as laboratories. AMBIO 42(2): 116-128.
[3] Anon. 1985. The deligatebalanse that saves vital resources. Irrigation Age 35(2): 13-16.
[4] Anon. 1998. Effect of irrigation schedules and nitrogen levels on the yield of tapioca through drip system of irrigation. Paper presented at the Scientific Workers Conference (Agriculture), 9-10 June, in Coimbatore, India.
[5] Asokaraja, N. 1998. Techno-economic evaluation of drip irrigation and mulching in tomato. Paper presented at the Scientific Workers Conference (Horticulture), December 3, in Periyakulam, India.
[6] Bachev, H. 2016. Defining and assessing the governance of agrarian sustainability. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 7(4): 797-816.
[7] Berthet, E., et al. 2016. How to foster agroecological innovations? A comparison of participatory design methods. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 59(2): 280-301.
[8] Biasi, R., Brunori, E., Smiraglia, D. and Salvati, L. 2015. Linking traditional tree-crop landscapes and agro-biodiversity in Central Italy using a database of typical and traditional products: A multiple risk assessment through a data mining analysis. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24: 3009-3031.
[9] Bommarco, R., Kleijn, D. and Potts, S.G. 2013. Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28: 230-238.
[10] Bürgi, M., Hersperger, A. M. and Schneeberger, N. 2004. Driving forces of landscape change – current and new directions. Landscape Ecology, 19: 857-868. DOI: 10.1007/ s10980-004-0245-8
[11] Chub, Y.V. and Tkal, Y.S. 2017. The system of management of the intangible assets in the agricultural enterprises. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 8(6): 1727-1739.
[12] Collins, S.L. et al. 2011. An integrated conceptual framework for long-term social-ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9: 351-357.
[13] Dias, I.C.L., Nunes, G., and Castro, A.C.L.D. 2016. Characterization of wastewater of cattle slaughterhouse for its reuse. Periodico Tche Quimica, 13(26): 59-68.
[14] Estrada-Carmona, N. et al. 2014. Integrated landscape management for agriculture, rural livelihoods, and ecosystem conservation: an assessment of experience from Latin America and the Caribbean. Landscape and Urban Planning, 129: 1-11.
[15] Goldberg, S. 1980. The latest developments in drip cultivation practices. Paper presented at the Symhosium on Drip Irrigation in Horticulture with Foreign Experts Participating, May 15, in Skierniewice, Poland.
[16] Grando, C.N., Diehl, M.J.G., and Mistura, C.M. 2016. Treatment of wastewater containing rhodamine by advanced oxidation process (AOP): Fenton, photo-fenton and ozonation. Periodico Tche Quimica, 13(26): 46-51.
[17] Hauck, J., et al. 2013. Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: some stakeholder perspectives. Environmental Science & Policy, 25: 13-21.
[18] Kareem, A.A. 1999. Mikro-irrigation need of the 21st century for conserving water resources. Paper presented at the 17th congress on irrigation and drainage. Transactions Astes. Volume ID. Question 48. August 12, in Granada. Spain.
[19] Khadys, B., Sikhimbayeva, D., and Bozhkarauly, A. 2018. State regulation of the development of the agro-industrial complex of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(1): 127-138.
[20] Khodakivska, O. and Mohylnyi, O. 2018. The modern state agricultural policy of Ukrainia: Problems of countries with transition economy. Public Policy and Administration, 17(4): 526-538.
[21] Kragt, M.E. and Robertson, M.J. 2014. Quantifying ecosystem services trade-offs from agricultural practices. Ecological Economics, 102: 147-157.
[22] Lefebvre, M. Espinosa, M. and Paloma, S. 2012. The influence of the common agricultural policy on agricultural landscapes. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34: 309-325.
[23] Malezieux, E. et al. 2009. Mixing plant species in cropping systems: concepts, tools and models. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29: 43-62.
[24] Mallory, R. 1981. Amind of its own 38000 acres in Mojave Desert is irrigated by computer controlled "grabber tractor" units. Irrigation Journal, 31(4): 18, 21, 30.
[25] McKenzie, A.J., Emery, S.B., Franks, J.R. and Whittingham, M.J. 2013. FORUM: Landscape‐scale conservation: collaborative agri‐environment schemes could benefit both biodiversity and ecosystem services, but will farmers be willing to participate? Journal of Applied Ecology, 50: 1274-1280.
[26] Melnikienė, R., Eičaitė, O. and Volkov, A. 2018. Sustainable development of agriculture: Policy formulation and assessment of constraints. Public Policy and Administration, 17(2): 226-239.
[27] Moldakenova, Y. et al. 2017. Kazakhstan and the European Union: Prospects of cooperation in developing the agro-industrial sector of economy. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 8(6): 1861-1874.
[28] Nelson, E., et al. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7: 4-11.
[29] Nosova, O.V., Karmanovskaya, N.V. and Galishevskaya, V.V. 2018. The study of water flows of technological water cycle and wastewater of metallurgical production concerning pollution content. Periodico Tche Quimica, 15(30): 550-555.
[30] Ostrom, E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social–ecological systems. Science, 325: 419-422.
[31] Patriota, S.N. et al. 2016. Potential waste of agro-industrial in developing adsorbents of heavy metals. Periodico Tche Quimica, 13(25): 42-51.
[32] Plaskova, N.S. et al. 2017. Methodological support of organizations implementing innovative activities investment attractiveness estimation. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 8(8): 2533-2539. DOI: 10.14505/jarle.v8.8(30).25
[33] Power, A.G. 2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365: 2959-2971. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0143
[34] Puech, C., Poggi, S., Baudry, J. and Aviron, S. 2015. Do farming practices affect natural enemies at the landscape scale? Landscape Ecology, 30: 125-140.
[35] Raišienė, A.G., Skulskis, V. 2018. Collaboration turn: Towards understanding stakeholder empowerment for agrarian policy making. Public Policy and Administration, 17(2): 177-191.
[36] Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G.D. and Bennett, E.M. 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 107: 5242-5247.
[37] Reyers, B. et al. 2013. Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social-ecological approach. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11: 268-273.
[38] Sabbi, A. and Salvati, L. 2014. Seeking for a downward spiral? Soil erosion risk, agro-forest landscape and socioeconomic conditions in Italian local communities. Land Use Policy, 41: 388-396.
[39] Scherr, S.J. and Mcneely, J.A. 2008. Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: towards a new paradigm of 'ecoagriculture' landscapes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363: 477-494.
[40] Schipanski, M.E. et al. 2014. A framework for evaluating ecosystem services provided by cover crops in agroecosystems. Agricultural Systems, 125: 12-22.
[41] Scholes, R.J. et al. 2013. Multi-scale and cross-scale assessments of social-ecological systems and their ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5: 16-25.
[42] Syswerda, S.P. and Robertson, G.P. 2014. Ecosystem services along a management gradient in Michigan (USA) cropping systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 189: 28-35.
[43] Takhumova, O.V., Lovyannikova, V.V. and Konovalova, I.A. 2016. Innovative mechanism for increasing the efficiency of regional agroindustrial sector. Actual Problems of Economics, 184(10): 228-234
[44] Tscharntke, T. et al. 2011. Multifunctional shade-tree management in tropical agroforestry landscapes – a review. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48: 619-629.
[45] Van Zanten, B.T. et al. 2013. European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34: 309-325.
[46] Wu, J.G. and David, J.L. 2002. A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications. Ecological Modelling, 153: 7-26.
Published
2019-08-30
How to Cite
BARBAKOV, Oleg M.; GERASIMOVA, Galina A.; PEZIN, Dmitry A.. Social and Environmental Mechanisms of Management in Agri-Business. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 3, p. 660-668, aug. 2019. ISSN 2068-7729. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/3843>. Date accessed: 20 nov. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v10.3(35).20.