Scientific-Theoretical Aspects of the Efficient Development of Land Relations in the Agrarian Sector of Economy
Abstract
In the context of potential threat to food security in the Republic of Kazakhstan (RK) that is determined by inefficient utilization of agricultural lands, the aim of the article was a conceptual approach to the development of the system of optimization measures for improving land relations in the agrarian sector of Kazakhstan’s economy. The methodological basis of the study is formed by statistical analysis which allowed identifying the main current trends in the development of land relations in the agricultural sector of the RK. Using expert method, a sample for determining the gaming index for assessment of efficiency of land relations at the regional level was formed. The critical level of land relations efficiency in the agricultural sector was determined by taxonomic analysis and problematic regions of Kazakhstan with low efficient land relations were distinguished. The study argued and substantiated the components of land relations efficiency in the agricultural sector: social efficiency, economic efficiency and ecological efficiency. These components of land relations reflect conditions and productivity of using agricultural lands in the framework of an integrated approach. The critical levels of social, economic and ecological efficiency of land relations on the regional level were determined, which allowed identifying the problematic aspects of land relations for the RK regions based on the actual level of their development. Considering the current level of land relations efficiency, the developed system of optimization measures is distinguishably aimed at improving the social, economic and ecological efficiency of land relations in the RK.References
[1] Bayanova, M. 2015. Land Relations Management at the Municipal Level. Counselor of State, 1 (9): 22-27.
[2] Beristenov, A., Ospanov, B. 2013. Transformation of land relations and improvement of land legislation in Kazakhstan. Interexpo Geo-Siberia 8. Available at: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/preobrazovanie-zemelnyh-otnosheniy-i-sovershenstvovanie-zemelnogo-zakonodatelstva-v-kazahstane (accessed April 25, 2016)
[3] Czyżewski, B., and Matuszczak, A. 2016. A new land rent theory for sustainable agriculture. Land Use Policy, 55: 222-229.
[4] Demetrioua, D. 2016. The assessment of land valuation in land consolidation schemes: The need for a new land valuation framework. Land Use Policy, 54: 487-498.
[5] Eidelman, G. 2016. Rethinking public land ownership and urban development: A Canadian perspective. Cities, 55: 122-126.
[6] Galinovskaya, Ye. 2015. Land relations as a socio-legal phenomenon. Infra-M.
[7] Gugushvili, A. 2016. Money can’t buy me land: Foreign land ownership regime and public opinion in a transition society. Land Use Policy, 55: 142-153.
[8] Hartmann, T., and Spit, T. 2015. Dilemmas of involvement in land management – Comparing an active (Dutch) and a passive (German) approach. Land Use Policy, 42: 729-737.
[9] Hiironen, J., and Riekkinen, K. 2016. Agricultural impacts and profitability of land consolidations. Land Use Policy, 55: 309-317.
[10] Jürgenson, E. 2016. Land reform, land fragmentation and perspectives for future land consolidation in Estonia. Land Use Policy, 57: 34-43.
[11] Knokea, T. et al. 2015. Optimizing agricultural area-use portfolios with scarce data – A non-stochastic model. Ecological Economics, 120: 250-259.
[12] Krassov, O. 2014. Ownership of land in Europe. Norma, Infra-M.
[13] Kukhtin, P. 2014. Current situation of public land management theory. Internet Journal Naukovedenie 2 (21): 1-8. Available at: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovremennye-polozheniya-teorii-gosudarstvennogo-upravleniya-zemelnymi-resursami (accessed May 12, 2016)
[14] Malganova, I., and Zagladina, H. 2015. Instrumental and Methodological Approaches to Research of Socio - Economic Development of the Region. Procedia Economics and Finance, 27: 64-68.
[15] Padeiro, M. 2016. Conformance in land-use planning: The determinants of decision, conversion and transgression. Land Use Policy 55: 285-299.
[16] Palevičienė, A., and Dumčiuvienė, D. 2015. Socio-Economic Diversity of European Regions: Finding the Impact for Regional Performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23: 1096-1101.
[17] Perminova, T. et al. 2016. Methods for land use impact assessment: A review. Ecological Impact Assessment Review, 60: 64-74.
[18] Rahmatizadeh, Sh., Rajabifard, A., and Kalantari, M. 2016. A conceptual framework for utilising VGI in land administration. Land Use Policy, 56: 81-89.
[19] Shuvalova, Ye. 2013. Features of the municipal land management. Property relations in the Russian Federation 4 (139): 90-93.
[20] Sidnyayev, N. 2016. The theory of experimental design and analysis of statistical data. Yurayt.
[21] Ustaoglu, E., Perpiña Castillo, C., Jacobs-Crisioni, C., and Lavalle, C. 2016. Economic evaluation of agricultural area to assess land use changes. Land Use Policy, 56: 125-146.
[22] Van Oosteroma, P., and Lemmenb, C. 2015. The Land Administration Domain Model (LADM): Motivation, standardisation, application and further development. Land Use Policy, 49: 527-534.
[23] Van Vlieta, J. et al. 2016. A review of current calibration and validation practices in land-change modeling. Ecological Modelling & Software, 82: 174-182.
[24] Vasyanovich, A. 2013. Some Problems of Application of Land Law: Analysis and Solutions Areas. East-Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Justice.
[25] Voronkova, O. 2014. Guiding principles for the development of land relations in the direction of agricultural land greening. Bulletin of the Altai State Agrarian University, 9(119): 152-156.
[26] Wanga, H., Riedingerc, J., and Jind, S. 2015. Land documents, tenure security and land rental development: Panel evidence from China. China Economic Review, 36: 220-235.
[27] Wolf, S. et al. 2013. A multi-agent model of several economic regions. Ecological Modelling & Software, 44: 25-43.
[28] Yerkinbayeva, L., and Bekturganov, A. 2013. Legal Problems of the Modern Agricultural Policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81: 514-519.
[29] Yucera, A., Kanb, M. Demirtasc, M. and Kalanlard, S. 2016. The importance of creating new inheritance policies and laws that reduce agricultural area fragmentation and its negative impacts in Turkey. Land Use Policy, 56: 1-7.
[30] Zhan, Sh. 2015. From Privatization to Deindustrialization: Implications of Chinese Rural Industry and the Ownership Debate Revisited. World Development, 74: 108-122.
*** Environmental protection and sustainable development of Kazakhstan for 2011-2015. Statistical Yearbook. Astana.
*** Land Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan as of June 20, 2003 № 442-II. Information and legal system of normative legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Available at: http://adilet.zan.kz/ rus/docs/K030000442 (accessed May 4, 2016)
*** Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The official Internet resource of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Available at: http://mgov.kz
*** Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The official Internet resource of the Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Committee on Statistics. Available at: http://www.stat.gov.kz/faces/homePage?_afrLoop=1737433474531559#%40%3F_afrLoop%3D1737433474531559%26_adf.ctrl-state%3D16cxczgn9h_58
*** Roundtable discussion “Topical issues of land relations in Kazakhstan”. 2016. Your vision Blog platform, Available at: http://yvision.kz/post/693994 (accessed April 29, 2016).
*** Statistical indicators of socio-economic development of the Republic of Kazakhstan and its regions. 2016. Monthly information-analytical magazine. Astana.
[2] Beristenov, A., Ospanov, B. 2013. Transformation of land relations and improvement of land legislation in Kazakhstan. Interexpo Geo-Siberia 8. Available at: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/preobrazovanie-zemelnyh-otnosheniy-i-sovershenstvovanie-zemelnogo-zakonodatelstva-v-kazahstane (accessed April 25, 2016)
[3] Czyżewski, B., and Matuszczak, A. 2016. A new land rent theory for sustainable agriculture. Land Use Policy, 55: 222-229.
[4] Demetrioua, D. 2016. The assessment of land valuation in land consolidation schemes: The need for a new land valuation framework. Land Use Policy, 54: 487-498.
[5] Eidelman, G. 2016. Rethinking public land ownership and urban development: A Canadian perspective. Cities, 55: 122-126.
[6] Galinovskaya, Ye. 2015. Land relations as a socio-legal phenomenon. Infra-M.
[7] Gugushvili, A. 2016. Money can’t buy me land: Foreign land ownership regime and public opinion in a transition society. Land Use Policy, 55: 142-153.
[8] Hartmann, T., and Spit, T. 2015. Dilemmas of involvement in land management – Comparing an active (Dutch) and a passive (German) approach. Land Use Policy, 42: 729-737.
[9] Hiironen, J., and Riekkinen, K. 2016. Agricultural impacts and profitability of land consolidations. Land Use Policy, 55: 309-317.
[10] Jürgenson, E. 2016. Land reform, land fragmentation and perspectives for future land consolidation in Estonia. Land Use Policy, 57: 34-43.
[11] Knokea, T. et al. 2015. Optimizing agricultural area-use portfolios with scarce data – A non-stochastic model. Ecological Economics, 120: 250-259.
[12] Krassov, O. 2014. Ownership of land in Europe. Norma, Infra-M.
[13] Kukhtin, P. 2014. Current situation of public land management theory. Internet Journal Naukovedenie 2 (21): 1-8. Available at: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovremennye-polozheniya-teorii-gosudarstvennogo-upravleniya-zemelnymi-resursami (accessed May 12, 2016)
[14] Malganova, I., and Zagladina, H. 2015. Instrumental and Methodological Approaches to Research of Socio - Economic Development of the Region. Procedia Economics and Finance, 27: 64-68.
[15] Padeiro, M. 2016. Conformance in land-use planning: The determinants of decision, conversion and transgression. Land Use Policy 55: 285-299.
[16] Palevičienė, A., and Dumčiuvienė, D. 2015. Socio-Economic Diversity of European Regions: Finding the Impact for Regional Performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23: 1096-1101.
[17] Perminova, T. et al. 2016. Methods for land use impact assessment: A review. Ecological Impact Assessment Review, 60: 64-74.
[18] Rahmatizadeh, Sh., Rajabifard, A., and Kalantari, M. 2016. A conceptual framework for utilising VGI in land administration. Land Use Policy, 56: 81-89.
[19] Shuvalova, Ye. 2013. Features of the municipal land management. Property relations in the Russian Federation 4 (139): 90-93.
[20] Sidnyayev, N. 2016. The theory of experimental design and analysis of statistical data. Yurayt.
[21] Ustaoglu, E., Perpiña Castillo, C., Jacobs-Crisioni, C., and Lavalle, C. 2016. Economic evaluation of agricultural area to assess land use changes. Land Use Policy, 56: 125-146.
[22] Van Oosteroma, P., and Lemmenb, C. 2015. The Land Administration Domain Model (LADM): Motivation, standardisation, application and further development. Land Use Policy, 49: 527-534.
[23] Van Vlieta, J. et al. 2016. A review of current calibration and validation practices in land-change modeling. Ecological Modelling & Software, 82: 174-182.
[24] Vasyanovich, A. 2013. Some Problems of Application of Land Law: Analysis and Solutions Areas. East-Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Justice.
[25] Voronkova, O. 2014. Guiding principles for the development of land relations in the direction of agricultural land greening. Bulletin of the Altai State Agrarian University, 9(119): 152-156.
[26] Wanga, H., Riedingerc, J., and Jind, S. 2015. Land documents, tenure security and land rental development: Panel evidence from China. China Economic Review, 36: 220-235.
[27] Wolf, S. et al. 2013. A multi-agent model of several economic regions. Ecological Modelling & Software, 44: 25-43.
[28] Yerkinbayeva, L., and Bekturganov, A. 2013. Legal Problems of the Modern Agricultural Policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81: 514-519.
[29] Yucera, A., Kanb, M. Demirtasc, M. and Kalanlard, S. 2016. The importance of creating new inheritance policies and laws that reduce agricultural area fragmentation and its negative impacts in Turkey. Land Use Policy, 56: 1-7.
[30] Zhan, Sh. 2015. From Privatization to Deindustrialization: Implications of Chinese Rural Industry and the Ownership Debate Revisited. World Development, 74: 108-122.
*** Environmental protection and sustainable development of Kazakhstan for 2011-2015. Statistical Yearbook. Astana.
*** Land Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan as of June 20, 2003 № 442-II. Information and legal system of normative legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Available at: http://adilet.zan.kz/ rus/docs/K030000442 (accessed May 4, 2016)
*** Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The official Internet resource of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Available at: http://mgov.kz
*** Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The official Internet resource of the Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Committee on Statistics. Available at: http://www.stat.gov.kz/faces/homePage?_afrLoop=1737433474531559#%40%3F_afrLoop%3D1737433474531559%26_adf.ctrl-state%3D16cxczgn9h_58
*** Roundtable discussion “Topical issues of land relations in Kazakhstan”. 2016. Your vision Blog platform, Available at: http://yvision.kz/post/693994 (accessed April 29, 2016).
*** Statistical indicators of socio-economic development of the Republic of Kazakhstan and its regions. 2016. Monthly information-analytical magazine. Astana.
Published
2016-11-10
How to Cite
DAUZOVA, Aida Mazhidovna.
Scientific-Theoretical Aspects of the Efficient Development of Land Relations in the Agrarian Sector of Economy.
Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 3, p. 416-428, nov. 2016.
ISSN 2068-7729.
Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/351>. Date accessed: 26 apr. 2024.
Section
Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism
Keywords
agricultural area productivity; agricultural policy; agricultural sector of economy; agriculturally used areas; efficiency of land relations; land relations
Copyright© 2023 The Author(s). Published by ASERS Publishing 2023. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of CC-BY 4.0 license.