The Impact of Agricultural Environmental Pollutions on the Population’s Quality of Life. The Experience of Kazakhstan
Abstract
The purpose of the present study is analyzing the trends of agricultural pollutions and their impact on the health of the population of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The main research methods include a bibliographic review of the literature on the research subject, as well as qualitative and quantitative analysis of statistical indicators of agricultural production development, and the dynamics of agroecological indicators of the Republic of Kazakhstan. To assess the impact of agricultural changes on the quality of life associated with the health of the population, the analysis of secondary data of sociological research conducted by the Environmental Fund of Kazakhstan was carried out. The results of the study show that since 1999 the agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan has undergone structural changes which are characterized by active mechanization, intensification, and specialization. At the same time, the widespread use of fertilizers and pesticides, as well as irrigation, the growth of pollution from livestock, and the employment of heavy machinery have adverse effects on water and soil.
References
[2] Barth, H. and Melin, M.A., 2018. Green Lean approach to global competition and climate change in the agricultural sector: A Swedish case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204: 183-192.
[3] Bellemare, M.F. and Bloem, J.R. 2018. Does contract farming improve welfare? A review. World Development, 112: 259-271.
[4] Bloom, D.E. and Canning, D. 2008. Population health and economic growth. Commission on Growth and Development. Working Paper No.24.
[5] Canadian Medical Association (CMA), 2008. No breathing room - National Illness Costs of Air Pollution Summary Report. Canadian Medical Association. Available at: http://www.healthyenvironmentforkids.ca/resources/nobreathing-room-costs-of-air-pollution Accessed 12.01.2019
[6] Cruz, L., Ramos, P.N., Barata, E., and Sargento, A.L., 2017. Assessing an agri-food development strategy: A bi-regional input-output model with resource-constrained sectors. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 44(5): 860-882.
[7] Djoko Istiadji, A., Hardiman, G., and Satwiko, P. 2018. What is the sustainable method enough for our built environment? IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 213(1): 012016.
[8] Dwyer, J., Berriet-Solliec, M., Lataste, F.G., Short, C., Maréchal, A., and Hart, K., 2018. Social-Ecological systems approach to enhance sustainable farming and forestry in the EU. Euro Choices, 17(3): 4-10.
[9] European Environmental Agency (EEA), 2014. Costs of air pollution from European industrial facilities 2008-2012: An updated assessment. European Environment Agency Technical Report. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/costs-of-air-pollution-2008-2012 Accessed 12.01.2019.
[10] Fallah-Alipour, S., Boshrabadi, H.M., Mehrjerdi, M.R.Z., and Hayati, D., 2018. A framework for the empirical assessment of agricultural sustainability: The case of Iran. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(12): 4823.
[11] Gubaidullina, T., Ivanova, N., Absalyamova, S., and Yerina, T. 2018. Analysis of national strategies for sustainable development with regard to the fundamental conceptual premise. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1141(1): 012018.
[12] Hammouda, M., Wery, J., Darbin, T., and Belhouchette, H., 2018. Agricultural activity concept for simulating strategic agricultural production decisions: A case study of weed resistance to herbicide treatments in South-West France. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 155: 167-179.
[13] Kaldiyarov, D.A., Sharipov, A.K., and Bedelbayeva, A.E., 2014. Development of the concept of the optimum mechanism of government administration by the economy of an agroindustrial complex of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Life Science Journal, 11(spec. issue 7) 84: 394-400.
[14] Keesstra, S., et al. 2018. Soil-related sustainable development goals: Four concepts to make land degradation neutrality and restoration work. Land, 7(4), 133: 1-20.
[15] Kopacz, M., Kowalczyk, A., Smoroń, S., and Ostrach, Z. 2018. Sustainable management of water resources in terms of the water needs for agricultural purposes in small rural communes based on the example of the Grybów commune, Poland. Journal of Water and Land Development, 39(1): 67-76.
[16] Lindberg, G. and Hansson, H. 2009. Economic impacts of agriculture in Sweden: A disaggregated input-output approach. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section C: Food Economics, 6(2): 119-133.
[17] Livestock Pollution Prevention Program. (n. d.). Helping North Dakota producers manage livestock waste. https://www.nd.gov/ndda/livestock-development-division/livestock-pollution-prevention-program Accessed 12.01.2019.
[18] Martinho, V.J.P.D. 2015. Agricultural economics in the context of Portuguese rural development. In The Agricultural Economics of the 21st Century. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 121-136.
[19] Muchlis, D. and Nurcholis. 2018. Sustainable livestock development in the border of Merauke Region based on environment, E3S Web of Conferences, 73, No. 03010. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187303010 Accessed 12.01.2019.
[20] Oficial'naya statisticheskaya informaciya. Zanyatost' naseleniya [Official statistical information: Population employment]. Official portal of the Committee on Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Available at: http://stat.gov.kz/faces/wcnav_externalId/homeNumbersLabor?_afrLoop=5869528321690000#%40%3F_afrLoop%3D5869528321690000%26_adf.ctrl-state%3Dydnn0hokt_154 Accessed 12.01.2019.
[21] Rybaczewska-Błazejowska, M., and Gierulski, W., 2018. Eco-efficiency evaluation of agricultural production in the EU-28. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(12) 4544: 1-25.
[22] Sabasi, D. and Shumway, C.R. 2018. Climate change, health care access and regional influence on components of U.S. agricultural productivity. Applied Economics, 50(57): 6149-6164.
[23] Searchinger, T.D., Wirsenius, S., Beringer, T., and Dumas, P. 2018. Assessing the efficiency of changes in land use for mitigating climate change. Nature, 564 (7735): 249-253.
[24] Sheikhzeinoddin, A. and Esmaeili, A. 2017. Ecological and economic impacts of different irrigation and fertilization practices: A case study of a watershed in southern Iran. Environment, Development, and Sustainability, 19(6): 2499-2515.
[25] Shen, J., et al. 2018. Modeling nitrous oxide emissions from digestate and slurry applied to three agricultural soils in the United Kingdom: Fluxes and emission factors. Environmental Pollution, 243: 1952-1965.
[26] The impact of the environment on the population’s demographics and health. 2017. Astana. Available at: http://cisc.kz/upload/iblock/209/broshyura-rus.-yaz..pdf Accessed 12.01.2019.
[27] Velten, S., Leventon, J., Jager, N., and Newig, J. 2015. What is sustainable agriculture? A Systematic Review, Sustainability, 7: 7833-7865.
[28] World Bank. 2012. The Cost of Pollution in China: Economic estimates of physical damage. Washington: World Bank Publications, pp. 250
[29] Zhang, Y., Li, X., and Min, Q. 2018. How to balance the relationship between the conservation of Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (IAHS) and socio-economic development? A theoretical framework of sustainable industrial integration development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204: 553-563.
[30] Zhou, Z.-H., et al. 2018. Emission inventory and characteristics of anthropogenic air pollutant sources in the Sichuan Province. Huan Jing Kexue, 39(12): 5344-5358.
Copyright© 2024 The Author(s). Published by ASERS Publishing 2024. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of CC-BY 4.0 license.