Environmental Safety of Modern Kazakhstan: General Legal Analysis
Abstract
World experience shows that greening the entire socio-economic system of any state is the basis for successful solving of environmental problems and preventing environmental disasters. Environmental safety, as a component of national security, is an indispensable condition for sustainable development and is the basis for the preservation of natural systems and the maintenance of appropriate environmental quality. The Kazakhstan political and legal mechanism for ensuring environmental security against the background of multilateral and dynamically evolving international institutions has not achieved any significant efficiency yet. For many decades, Kazakhstan has developed a predominantly natural resource management system with extremely high technogenic pressure on the environment. Therefore, a fundamental improvement in the ecological situation has not occurred yet, and it is still characterized by the degradation of natural systems, which leads to a destabilization of the biosphere, a loss of its ability to maintain the quality of the environment, which is necessary for the community life. The article presents conclusions on the current list of threats to national security in the environmental field relevant for Kazakhstan. Specific offer has been made to improve the mechanisms for ensuring environmental safety, which includes: improving the efficiency of state control in the environmental protection and environmental management; optimization of licensing system of environmental management and environmental expertise; improvement of the environmental monitoring system; ecologization of legislation; systematization of legislation in the field of protection the environment; expansion of international cooperation.
References
[2] Ashford, N. A. and Caldart, C. C. 2001. Negotiated environmental and occupational health and safety agreements in the United States: lessons for policy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(2): 99-120, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00062-7
[3] Boyko, E. A. et al. 2016. About the formation of legislation in the field of chemical and biological safety of the Russian Federation. Gigiena i sanitariia, 95(8): 717-721. Available at: https://europepmc.org/abstract/med/29430893
[4] Davies, K. et al. 2017. The Declaration on Human Rights and Climate Change: A new legal tool for global policy change. J. Hum. Rights Environ, 8: 217-253, http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2017.02.03
[5] Ebbesson, J. 2010. The rule of law in governance of complex socio-ecological changes. Global Environmental Change, 20(3): 414-422, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.10.009
[6] Ebbesson, J. and Hey, E. 2013. Introduction: where in law is social-ecological resilience? Ecology and Society, 18(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05750-180325
[7] Garmestani, A. S., Allen, C. R., and Benson, M. H. 2013. Can law foster social-ecological resilience? Ecology and Society, 18(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05927-180237
[8] Glinskiy, V. V., Serga, L. K. and Khvan, M. S. 2015. Environmental safety of the region: New approach to assessment. Procedia CIRP, 26: 30-34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.08.017
[9] Glinskiy, V., Serga, L., Khvan, M. and Zaykov, K. 2018. The Assessment Methods of the Level of Countries Environmental Safety. Procedia Manufacturing, 21: 494-501, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.149
[10] Gunningham, N. 2011. Enforcing environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Law, 23(2): 169-201. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqr006
[11] Hongwei, L., Mou, L., and Song, Y. 2011. The Research and Practice of Environmental Safety Evaluation Method (II): Environmental Evaluation. In 2011 2nd International Conference on Challenges in Environmental Science and Computer Engineering (CESCE 2011) (Vol. 11, No. Part C, pp. 1211-1219), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2011.12.182
[12] Jianwei, Z. 2008. Scientific Establishment of Governmental Responsibility in Environmental Legislation. China Population, Resources and Environment, 18(1): 193-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-583X(08)60016-9
[13] Kammer, A. M. 2004. Soldiers of Semipalatinsk: Seeking a Theory and Forum for Legal Remedy. San Diego Int'l LJ, 5(1): 353. https://digital.sandiego.edu/ilj/vol5/iss1/10
[14] Karatayev, M. et al. 2017. The water-energy-food nexus in Kazakhstan: challenges and opportunities. Energy Procedia, 125: 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.064
[15] Kopylov, M. N. 2001. Pravo na razvitiye i ekologicheskaya bezopasnost' razvivayushchikhsya gosudarstv: (mezhdunarodno-pravovyye voprosy). Moscow. PhD diss., Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Available at: https://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/bitstream/handle/net/116514/0-785311.pdf?sequence=1
[16] Lyubarskiy, Ye. L., Kazantsev, S. Ya., and Sarkisov, O. R. 2012. Ekologicheskaya bezopasnost' i ekologo-pravovyye problemy v oblasti zagryazneniya okruzhayushchey sredy. Obshchestvo s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu. Yuniti-Dana Publishing.
[17] Vorontsova, E., Vorontsov, A. and Drozdenko, Y. 2017. Organizational-Legal and Technological Aspects of Ensuring Environmental Safety of Mining Enterprises: Perspective Analysis in the Context of the General Enhancement of Environmental Problem. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 21, p. 02020). EDP Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/2017210202
[18] Wen, T., Wang, J., Ma, Z. and Bi, J. 2017. Driving forces behind the Chinese public's demand for improved environmental safety. Science of the Total Environment, 603: 237-243, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.086
Copyright© 2024 The Author(s). Published by ASERS Publishing 2024. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of CC-BY 4.0 license.