Development of Methods for Calculating the Environmental and Economic Efficiency of Waste Treatment Technologies

  • Gulmira B. KEZEMBAYEVA International Center for Field Analysis and Development Kazakh National Research Technical University after K.I. Satpayev Republic of Kazakhstan


Lack of land, transportation costs, environmental hazards, loss of valuable components contribute to the use of new methods for recycling. Therefore, the main objective of the work is to develop a methodology for calculating the environmental and economic efficiency of waste treatment technologies. In the work, economic efficiency was defined as the difference between the profit and costs associated with the implementation and implementation of this technology. The basis of the study, the authors took organic waste farms. As a processing technology, multiphase anaerobic fermentation was taken. It is established that the use of this technology contributes to the production of environmentally friendly bio-fertilizers, biologically active solution and biogas. It is determined that the submitted projects are cost-effective. Because it helps to reduce payments for waste disposal and prevent damage to the environment. Also, the use of biomass energy in the agro-industrial complex will provide an additional source of energy based on local renewable raw materials, concentrated organic fertilizers, bioactive solution.


[1] Akhmetshin, E.M., Kopylov, S.I., Lobova, S.V., Panchenko, N.B., Kostyleva, G. 2018. Specifics of the fuel and energy complex regulation: Seeking new opportunities for Russian and international aspects. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(4): 169-177.
[2] Analysis of the effectiveness of technologies for processing typical waste that creates the same problems in all regions, and recommendations for their implementation. 2000. NITSPURO.
[3] Chernyy S. A. 2009. Morphological analysis and planning of the ecological and economic efficiency of recycling metallurgical wastes. Questions of economic sciences, 3: 137-142.
[4] Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On taxes and other obligatory payments to the budget”. Available at:
[5] Costa, C.D.C., Rocha, J.R.C.D. 2017. Perception of environmental education process and production of solid waste for elementary school students. Periodico Tche Quimica, 14(28): 56-65.
[6] Daus, Yu.V., Yudaev, I.V., and Stepanchuk, G.V. 2018. Reducing the costs of paying for consumed electric energy by utilizing solar energy. Applied Solar Energy, 54(2): 139–143.
[7] Eralieva A. A. 2002. Ecological and economic assessment of the effectiveness of environmental measures: methods and practices for transporting oil through trunk pipelines. Gylym.
[8] Gernaat D.E.H.J. 2015. Understanding the contribution of non-carbon dioxide gases in deep mitigation scenarios. Global Environmental Change, 33: 142-153.
[9] Gil A., Toledo M., Siles J .A., and Martín M. A. 2018. Multivariate analysis and biodegradability test to evaluate different organic wastes for biological treatments: Anaerobic co-digestion and co-composting. Waste Management 78: 819-828.
[10] Kapitonov, I.A., Voloshin, V.I., and Korolev, V.G. 2018. Eastern vector of Russian state policy development for ensuring energy security. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(5): 335-341.
[11] Karaeva Y. V. 2013. Biogas technology: a course of lectures. Energy Research Center.
[12] Kiziloz, B., Kupatadze, K. 2015. The impact of "wastenet project" on the ecology of Turkey and Georgia. Periodico Tche Quimica, 12(23): 39-46.
[13] Kuryntseva P., Galitskaya P., and Selivanovskaya S. 2016. Changes in the ecological properties of organic wastes during their biological treatment. Waste Management, 58: 90-97.
[14] Patriota, S.N., Cerutti, M.N., Mulholland, D.S., Marques, M.A., and Scheidt, G.N. 2016. Potential waste of agro-industrial in developing adsorbents of heavy metals. Periodico Tche Quimica, 13(25): 42-51.
[15] Quintern, M., Morley, M., Seaton, B., and Hamilton, R. 2016. How We Transform Industrial Organic Waste Into Vermicompost And Champion Environmental Sustainability. Waste Management and the Environment, 202: 147-159.
[16] Rafaj, P. 2018. Outlook for clean air in the context of sustainable development goals. Global Environmental Change, 53: 1-11.
[17] Rakishev, B. R. 2013. Complex use of ore at the enterprises of non-ferrous metallurgy of Kazakhstan. Gornyy Zhurnal, 7: 89-95.
[18] The method of calculating payments for emissions into the environment. Order of the Minister of Environmental Protection of the Republic of Kazakhstan of April 27, 2007. No. 124-p. Available at:
[19] Thilagan, J., Gayathri, B., and Sugumar, M. 2018. CO2 capture by adsorption and hydrate-based separation: a technological review. International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, 22(1/2/3/4): 147-181.
[20] Wang, Q., Aparu, P., Kurogawa, H. and Sugiyama, K. 2014. Recovery briquetting technologies of waste biomass and pyrolyzed waste char produced from solid industrial and agricultural organic wastes. Waste Management and the Environment, 9 (5): 705–716.
[21] Yu, H., Lyu, Y., Wang, J., and Wang, X. 2018. A biomimetic engineered grinding wheel inspired by phyllotaxis theory. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 251: 267-281.
How to Cite
KEZEMBAYEVA, Gulmira B.. Development of Methods for Calculating the Environmental and Economic Efficiency of Waste Treatment Technologies. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 7, p. 1624-1630, mar. 2019. ISSN 2068-7729. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 19 may 2019. doi: