Environmental Management Systems and Environmental Performance: The Case of Russian Energy Sector

  • Valery V. IOSIFOV Kuban State Technological University, Russia
  • Svetlana V. RATNER Institute of Control Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences, RUDN University, Russia


Nowadays one of the most common organizational eco-innovations in energy companies is introducing environmental management systems (EMS). Nevertheless, the issues of environmental and economic efficiency of EMS remain controversial. The purpose of this work is to develop a methodology for assessing the effectiveness of environmental management systems of Russian energy companies certified in accordance with ISO 14001. Since Russian companies do not have EMAS conformance certificates, the issues of the effectiveness of environmental management systems under the European Environmental Management Scheme and eco-audit were not considered in this study. The study is based on the data from annual corporate reports of the largest energy companies of the Russian Federation, which have the organizational and legal form of public joint-stock companies. The selection criteria were: i) the existence of an integrated management system, which is based on a certified environmental management system; ii) the presence in the corporate reports of data on the environmental performance of the company, at least a few years before and after the introduction of EMS, sufficient for statistical analysis using a two depended samples T-test. The study has shown that the application of ISO 14001 can be considered as a condition for the development of eco-innovation, as a well-designed environmental management strategy covers the whole range of issues related to innovative development, modernization and competitiveness. The introduction of EMS is also associated with an increase in the information transparency of the entire production system of the company, which is also a positive point in terms of the development of innovative processes.


[1] Anton, W.R.Q., Deltas, G., and Khanna, M. 2004. Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48: 632-654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2003.06.003
[2] Arimura, T.H., Darnall, N., Gangulu, R., and Katayama, H. 2016. The effect of ISO 14001 on environmental performance: Resolving equivocal findings. Journal of Environmental Management, 166: 556-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.032
[3] Comoglio, C., and Botta, S. 2012. The use of indicators and the role of environmental management systems for environmental performances improvement: a survey on ISO 14001 certified companies in the automotive sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 20: 92-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.022
[4] Dolgopyatova T. G., Iwasaki I., and Yakovlev A. 2017. Introduction: Russian firms in comparative perspective. Economic Systems, 41:1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2017.02.001
[5] Fernández-Cuesta, C., Castro, P., Tascon, M.T., and Castano, F.J. 2018. The effect of environmental performance on financial debt. European evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207: 379-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.239
[6] Filippov, S.P., and Dil’man, M.D. 2018. CHP Plants in Russia: the Necessity for Technological Renovation. Thermal Engineering, 65(11): 775-790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601518110022
[7] Frondel, M., Krätschell, K., and Zwick, L. 2018. Environmental management systems: Does certification pay? Economic Analysis and Policy, 59:14-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2018.02.006
[8] Gianni, M., Gotzamani, K., and Tsiotras, G. 2017. Multiple perspectives on integrated management systems and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168:1297-1311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.061
[9] Hang, M., Geyer-Klingeberg, J., and Rathgeberg, A. 2018. It is a merely a matter of time: A meta-analysis on the causality between environmental performance and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8): 105-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2215
[10] Hang, M., Geyer-Klingeberg, J., Rathgeberg, A., and Stockl, S. 2018. Economic development matters: A meta-regression analysis on the relation between environmental management and financial performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 22(4): 720-744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12573
[11] Hartman, J., and Vachon, S. 2018. Linking environmental management to environmental performance: the interactive role of Industry context. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(3): 359-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2003
[12] Hertin, J., Berkhout, F., Wagner, M., and Tyteca, D. 2008. Are EMS environmentally effective? The link between environmental management systems and environmental performance in European companies. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51: 259-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560701865040
[13] Iosifov, V.V., et al. 2017. The problem of harmonizing the environmental priorities of electricity generating companies and regional socio-economic systems: DEA-based approach. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(5): 159-165.
[14] Iwata, K., Arimura, T., and Hibiki, S. 2010. An empirical analysis of determinants of ISO 14001 adoption and its influence on toluene emission reduction. JCER Economic Journal, 62:16-38.
[15] King, A.A., Lenox, M.J., and Terlaak, A. 2005. The strategic use of decentralized institutions: exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 1091-1106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.19573111
[16] Lam, P.T.I., et al. 2011. Environmental management system vs green specifications: how do they complement each other in the construction industry? Journal of Environmental Management, 92: 788-795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.030
[17] Latan H., et al. 2018. Effects of environmental strategy, environmental uncertainty and top management's commitment on corporate environmental performance: The role of environmental management accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180: 297- 306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.106
[18] Liao, Z. 2018. Institutional pressure, knowledge acquisition, and firm’s environmental innovation. Business Strategy and Environment, 27(7): 849-857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2036
[19] Lo, C.K.Y., and Yeung, A.C.L. 2018. Quality management standards, institutionalization and organizational implications: a longitudinal analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 200: 231-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.03.028
[20] MacDonald, J.P. 2005. Strategic sustainable development using the ISO 14001 Standard. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13: 631-643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.06.001
[21] Maier, D., et al. 2015. Innovation as a part of an existing integrated management system. Procedia on Economics and Finance, 26: 1060-1067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00930-2
[22] Melnyk, S.A., Sroufe, R.P., Calantone, R.L., and Montabon, F.L. 2002. Assessing the effectiveness of US voluntary environmental programmes: an empirical study. International Journal of Production Research, 40: 1853-1878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540110118398
[23] Merly, R., Luccetti, M.C., Preziosi, M., and Arcese, G. 2018. Causes of Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) stagnation and enabling measures to stimulate new registrations: Characterization of public administrations and private-owned organizations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190: 137-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.303
[24] Molina-Azorín, J.F., Tarí, J.J., Claver-Cortés, E., and López-Gamero, M.D. 2009. Quality management, environmental management and firm performance: a review of empirical studies and issues of integration. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11: 197-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00238.x
[25] Murmura, F., Liberatore, L., Bravi, L., and Casolani, N. 2018. Evaluation of Italian companies' perception about ISO 14001 and Eco Management and Audit Scheme III: motivations, benefits and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174: 691-700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.337
[26] Nawrocka, D., and Parker, T. 2009.Finding the connection: environmental management systems and environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17: 601-607. DOI: https://doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.10.003
[27] Nishitani, K., Kaneko, S., Fujii, H., Komatsu, S. 2012. Are firms’ voluntary environmental management activities beneficial for the environment and business? An empirical study focusing on Japanese manufacturing firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 105:121-130. DOI: https://10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.054
[28] Orazalin, N., and Mahmood, M. 2018. Economic, environmental, and social performance indicators of sustainability reporting: Evidence from the Russian oil and gas industry. Energy Policy, 121: 70-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.015
[29] Ozusaglam S., Kesidou, E., and Wong, C.Y. 2018. Performance effects of complementarity between environmental management systems and environmental technologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 197: 112-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.12.026
[30] Pinto, G.M.C., et al. 2018. Environmental management practices in industries of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) from 2011 to 2015. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198: 1251-1261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.046
[31] Ratner, S., Chepurko, Y., Drobyshevskaya, L., and Petrovskaya, A. 2018. Management of energy enterprises: energy-efficiency approach in solar collectors’ industry: the case of Russia. International Journal of Energy Economic and Policy, 8(4): 237-243
[32] Ratner, S.V., and Ratner, P.D. 2017. Developing a strategy of environmental management for electric generating companies using DEA-Methodology. Advances in Systems Science and Applications, 17 (4): 78-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25728/assa.2017.17.4.521
[33] Russo, M.V. 2009. Explaining the impact of ISO 14001 on emission performance: a dynamic capabilities perspective on process and learning. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18: 307–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.587
[34] Salim, H.K., et al. 2018. Global trends in environmental management system and ISO14001 research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170: 645-653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.017
[35] Shvarts E.A., Pakhalov, A.M., and Knizhnikov, A.Yu. 2016. Assessment of environmental responsibility of oil and gas companies in Russia: the rating method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 127: 143-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.021
[36] Soriishian, S., and Ting, K.C. 2018. Reasons for implementing ISO 14001 in Malaysia. Environmental Quiality Management, 27(4): 125-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21561
[37] Testa F., et al. 2014. EMAS and ISO 14001: the differences in effectively improving environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 68: 165-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.061
[38] Zobel, T. 2013. ISO 14001 certification in manufacturing firms: a tool for those in need or an indication of greenness? Journal of Cleaner Production, 43: 37–44. DOI: https://10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.014
How to Cite
IOSIFOV, Valery V.; RATNER, Svetlana V.. Environmental Management Systems and Environmental Performance: The Case of Russian Energy Sector. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 7, p. 1377-1388, mar. 2019. ISSN 2068-7729. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/2727>. Date accessed: 19 may 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v9.7(31).02.