A Study on Institutional, Market and Natural Environment Impact on Agrarian Sustainability in Bulgaria

  • Hrabrin BACHEV Institute of Agricultural Economics, Bulgaria
  • Dimitar TERZIEV University of National and World Economy, Bulgaria

Abstract

The specific system of governance is a critical factor, which to a great extent (pre)determines the type and speed of development in different countries, industries, regions, communities, etc. This article tries to fill the gap and assesses the impact of institutional environment on agrarian sustainability in Bulgaria. The interdisciplinary New Institutional Economics framework is applied and assessment made on specific effects of major components of the “external” institutional environment on agrarian sustainability level in different administrative, geographical and ecological regions, subsectors of agriculture, and farms of various juridical type and size. Our study has found out that individual elements of external institutional, market and natural environment affect quite unequally farms of different types, individual subsectors of agriculture, and specific ecological and geographical regions. This type of studies is to be expended and their precision and representation increased. The latter however, requires a close cooperation between all interested parties, and participation of the farmers, agrarian organizations, local and central authorities, interest groups, research institutes and experts, etc.

References

[1] Bachev, H. 2002. Study on Land Supply in Bulgarian Farms, Farm Management and Rural Planning, 3: 189-203.
[2] Bachev, H. 2003. Study on Labor Supply in Bulgarian Farms, Farm Management and Rural Planning, 4: 129-145.
[3] Bachev, H. 2009. Mechanisms of Governance of Agro-Ecosystem Services, in P. Liotta, D. Mouat, J.Lancaster, B. Kepner and D. Smith (editors), Achieving Environmental Security: Ecosystem Services and Human Welfare, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 31-52.
[4] Bachev, H. 2010. Governance of Agrarian Sustainability, New York: Nova Science Publishers.
[5] Bachev, H. 2010. Management of Farm Contracts and Competitiveness, VDM Verlag Dr.Muller.
[6] Bachev, H. 2011. Water Governance in Bulgarian Agriculture, in A. Baba, G. Tayfur, O. Gunduz, K.Howard, M.Friedel, and A.Chambel (editors), Climate Change and its Effects on Water Resources, Issues of National and Global Security, Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 215-224.
[7] Bachev, H. 2014. Environmental Management in Agriculture, Mechanisms, Forms and Efficiency, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
[8] Bachev, H. 2016. Defining and Assessing the Governance of Agrarian Sustainability, Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, Volume VII, Issue 4(18): 797-816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.7.4(18).12
[9] Bachev, H. 2017. Sustainability Level of Bulgarian Farms, Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 23 (1): 1-13.
[10] Bachev, H. 2018. Impact of Institutional Environment on Agrarian Sustainability in Bulgaria, Economic Thought, 5(1): 72-110.
[11] Bachev, H. 2018. The Sustainability of Farming Enterprises in Bulgaria, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
[12] Bachev, H. and Tsuji, M. 2001. Structures for Organization of Transactions in Bulgarian Agriculture, Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture of Kyushu University, 46 (1): 123-151.
[13] Bachev, H. and Kagatsume, M. 2002. Governing of Financial Supply in Bulgarian Farms, The Natural Resource Economics Review, 8: 131-150.
[14] Bachev, H. and Kagatsume, M. 2003. Governing of Output Realization in Bulgarian Farms, The Natural Resource Economics Review, 9: 55-69.
[15] Bachev, H. and Nanseki T. 2008. Environmental Management in Bulgarian Agriculture – Risks, Modes, Major Challenges, Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture of Kyushu University, 53(1): 363- 373.
[16] Bachev, H., Ivanov, B., Toteva, D., and Sokolova, E. 2016. Agrarian Sustainability and its Governance – Understanding, Evaluation, Improvement, Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 4 (16): 639-663.
[17] Bachev, H., Ivanov, B., Toteva, D., and Toteva, E. 2017. Agrarian sustainability in Bulgaria – economic, social and ecological aspects, Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 23 (4): 519-525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v7.4(16).11
[18] Bachev, H. and Terziev, D. 2017. Environmental Sustainability of Agricultural Farms in Bulgaria, Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 8(5): 968-994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v8.5(21).02
[19] Bachev, H., and Terziev, D. 2018. A Study on Agrarian Sustainability Impact of Governance Modes in Bulgaria. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Volume XIII, 1(55): 227-257.
[20] Furuboth, E. and Richter, R. 1998. Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
[21] North, D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[22] Raman, S. 2006. Agricultural Sustainability. Principles, Processes and Prospect., New York: The Haworth Press Inc.
[23] Sauvenier X., et al. 2005. Framework for Assessing Sustainability Levels in Belgium Agricultural Systems – SAFE, Belgium Science Policy, Brussels.
[24] Terziev, D., and Radeva D. 2016. Studying the New Agriculture. 2nd International Conference on Development and Economics (I.CO.D.ECON.), Thessaloniki, Greece, Conference proceedings: https://icodecon.com/images/docs/proceedings_2017_3_18.pdf, 175-179
[25] UN 1992. Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, 3-14 June 1992, Rio de Janeiro: United Nation.
[26] UN 2015. Paris Climate Change Conference – November-December 2015
[27] Williamson, O. 1996. The Mechanisms of Governance. Oxford University Press.
Published
2018-09-10
How to Cite
BACHEV, Hrabrin; TERZIEV, Dimitar. A Study on Institutional, Market and Natural Environment Impact on Agrarian Sustainability in Bulgaria. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 3, p. 452-478, sep. 2018. ISSN 2068-7729. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/2253>. Date accessed: 23 nov. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v9.3(27).06.