System Diagnostics and Monitoring of Socio-Economic and Tourist Potential of Peripheral Territories of the Region

Mikhail KAZAKOV; Vladimir GLADILIN; Alla MIROKHINA; Elena DRANNIKOVA; Galina NAROZHNAYA

doi:10.14505//jemt.v9.2(26).08

Mikhail KAZAKOV North-Caucasus Federal University, Russian Federation
Vladimir GLADILIN Moscow State Pedagogical University, branch in Stavropol, Russian Federation
Alla MIROKHINA Moscow Technological University, branch in Stavropol, Russian Federation
Elena DRANNIKOVA Moscow Technological University, branch in Stavropol, Russian Federation
Galina NAROZHNAYA Moscow Technological University, branch in Stavropol, Russian Federation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v9.2(26).08

Abstract

The paper defines a heuristic task to formulate and approve methodological provisions on the system diagnostics and monitoring of the socio-economic and tourist potential of peripheral territories in the regions which are the basis for planning and implementing spatial and economic transformations. This area of scientific and methodological research and development is relevant because of the need for searching reserves for the advancement of territories based on the inventory taking and the fullest use of available resource opportunities. In this regard, the article has improved the organizational and methodological approaches to conduct monitoring as a part of a comprehensive system diagnostics of peripheral territories of the region based on analytical criteria for socio-economic and tourist potential. The authors formulated a semantic and economic interpretation of the findings and outlined the prospects for using them when forming socio-economic development policy of regions and their economy sectors. The scientific novelty of the present article consists in development of elements of system research and diagnostic methodology with respect to development potential of peripheral areas, based on the analysis of the socio-economic and tourism factors. The combination of results and recommendations represents a contribution to the scientific substantiation of spatial and sectoral analysis.

References

[1] Aralbaev, G.G. 2008. Monitoring kak instrument issledovaniya regional'noj social'no-ehkonomicheskoj sistemy [Monitoring as a Tool to Study the Regional Socio-Economic System] [Text]. The Economic Integration Bulletin, 5: 91-99.
[2] Bunchikov, O.N. and Yeremin, R.V. 2012. Konceptual'naya model' monitoringa social'no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya regiona [Conceptual Model of Monitoring of Regional Socio-Economic Development] [Text]. Bulletin of the Don State Agrarian University, 1: 44-48.
[3] Dzhukha, V.M. and Sinyuk, T.Yu. 2012. Diagnostika social'no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya regiona na osnove prostranstvenno-vremennoj sistemy monitoringa [Diagnostics of Socio-Economic Development of the Region Based on Spatial and Temporal System Monitoring] [Text]. Economic Systems Management, electronic scientific journal, 4(40): 35.
[4] Kostyukova, E.I., Bobryshev, A.N., and Mamedova, K.G., 2013. Obosnovanie predposylok i ehlementov klasterno-setevoj organizacii regional'noj ehkonomiki [The rationale for the prerequisites and elements of the cluster and Network Based Organization of Regional Economy] [Text]. Concept, scientific-methodical electronic journal, 3: 2216-2220.
[5] Popova, O.A., Malinovskaya, N.A., and Nagaslaeva, I.Yu. 2015. Analiz sistemy monitoringa social'no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya regiona [Analysis of the Monitoring System of Socio-Economic Development of the Region] [Text]. Bulletin of Zabaykalsky State University, 1(116): 142-146.
[6] Yashin, S.N. and Puzov, E.N. 2006. Pokazateli kompleksnoj sravnitel'noj ocenki potenciala regiona v ramkah monitoringa bezopasnosti [Indicators of the Integrated Comparative Assessment of the Region’s Potential in the Framework of the Security Monitoring] [Text]. Finance and Credit, 5: 39-44.
[7] Arbia, G. 2001. Modelling the Geography of Economic Activities on a Continuous Space. Papers in Regional Science, 80: 411–424.
[8] Litvin, D. B. et al. 2015. Monitoring of the Parameters of Intra-Industrial Differentiation of the Primary Industry of the Traditionally Industrial Region of Southern Russia. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 3(13): 606 – 615
[9] Batten, D. 2001. Complex Landscapes of Spatial Interaction. The Annals of Regional Science, 35(1): 81-111
[10] Davis, D.R. and Weinstein, D.E. 1999. Economic Geography and Regional Production Structure: An Empirical Investigation. European Economic Review, 43: 379-407.
[11] Ersoy, A. and Taylor, M. 2012. Understanding Dynamics of Local and Regional Economic Development in Emerging Economies. Ekonomska istrazivanja-economic research, DEC: 1079-1088.
[12] Fukuchi, T. 2000. Long-run Development of a Multi-Regional Economy. Papers in Regional Science, 79(1): 1–31.
[13] Head, K. and Mayer, T., 2004. The Empirics of Agglomeration and Trade. The Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4: 2609-2669.
[14] Garretsen, H. and Martin, R. 2010. Rethinking (new) Economic Geography Models: Taking geography and history more seriously. Spatial Economic Analysis, 5(2): 127-160.
[15] Karlsson, C. and Zhang, W. 2001. The Role of Universities in Regional Development of Endogenous Human Capital and Growth in a Two-Region Model. The Annals of Regional Science, 35(2): 179–97.
[16] Fujita, M., Krugman, P., and Venables, A.J. 1999. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge, London (England): MIT Press, pp. 367
[17] Edwards, M.E. 2007. Regional and Urban Economics and Economic Development: Theory and Methods. Publisher: Routledge, pp. 786.
[18] Quigley, J. 2001. The Renaissance in Regional Research. The Annals of Regional Science, 35(2): 167-178
[19] Roberts, B. and Murray A. 2002. National and Regional Corporate Spatial Structure. The Annals of Regional Science, 36: 347-368.
[20] Shibusaw, H. 2000. Cyberspace and Physical Space in an Urban Economy. Papers in Regional Science, 79: 253-270