Participatory Approach on Water Scarcity Solutions in Pranburi Basin, Thailand

  • Watcharapong NOIMUNWA Interdisciplinary Programs of Environmental Science, Graduate School Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
  • Patama SINGHRUCK Department of Marine Science, Faculty of Science Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
  • Penjai SOMPONGCHAIYAKUL Department of Marine Science, Faculty of Science Chulalongkorn University, Thailand


Water scarcity is the main problems of water management and various socio-economic development activities of Thailand. Expert opinion and scientific knowledge are always convenient to be used to solve problems. To some extent, this approach may not be applicable since it is not accepted by local communities. To reduce this conflict, participatory approach may provide local cooperation and assist developing better water management strategies. Pranburi Basin is an important headwater that supports both agricultural land and municipality which includes Hua-Hin, a famous tourist place. The aims of this study were to assess water scarcity and to apply stakeholder participation into decision making processes for water management. Water stress index and criticality ratio were used to assess water scarcity. A Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework was used to describe water scarcity and contributing factors. Based on DPSIR analysis, the stakeholders proposed and then prioritized for the most appropriate responses by ordinary weighing technique. The results indicated that the four most preferable measures for this basin include controlling agricultural area, controlling crop types, reforestation and establishing local water user association.


[1] Bhadwal, S., et al. 2013. Adaptation to changing water resource availability in Northern India with respect to Himalayan Glacier retreat and changing monsoons using participatory approaches. Science of the Total Environment, 468–469, Supplement, S152-S161. DOI:
[2] Bhaktikul, K. 2012. State of Knowledge on Climate Change and Adaptation Activities in Thailand. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40: 701-708.
[3] Ceccato, L., Giannini, V., and Giupponi, C. 2011. Participatory assessment of adaptation strategies to flood risk in the Upper Brahmaputra and Danube river basins. Environmental Science & Policy, 14: 1163-1174.
[4] Chinvanno, S. et al. 2008. Climate change and adaptation ; Climate change and vulnerability / edited by Neil Leary ... [et al.] N. Leary (Ed.). Available at:
[5] EEA. 2014. Digest of EEA indicators 2014: EEA Technical report No.8. European Environment Agency, Kongens Nytorv 6, 1050 Copenhagen K, Denmark.:
[6] Gabarda-Mallorquí, A., Garcia, X., and Ribas, A. 2017. Mass tourism and water efficiency in the hotel industry: A case study. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 61: 82-93. DOI:
[7] Global Water Partnership. 2000. "Integrated Water Resources Management". Global Water Partnership Technical Advisory Committee, Background Paper no.4.
[8] Goodess, C. M. 2013. How is the frequency, location and severity of extreme events likely to change up to 2060? Environmental Science & Policy, 27s: s4 – s1 4.
[9] Henriques, C. et al. 2015. The future water environment — Using scenarios to explore the significant water management challenges in England and Wales to 2050. Science of the Total Environment, 512–513: 381-396. DOI:
[10] IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hanson, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 976pp.
[11] IPCC. 2012. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V. Barros, T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, D.J. Dokken, K.L. Ebi, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, G.-K. Plattner, S.K. Allen, M. Tignor, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA, 582 pp.
[12] IPCC. 2013. Climate Change 2013: Working Group I Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers
[13] IPCC. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of theIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland:
[14] Jeong, J. S. et al. 2017. Identifying priority areas for rural housing development using the participatory multi-criteria and contingent valuation methods in Alange reservoir area, Central Extremadura (Spain). Journal of Rural Studies, 50: 117-128. DOI:
[15] Jintrawet, A., and Chinvanno, S. 2008. Climate Change in Southeast Asia and Assessment on Impact, Vulnerability and Adaptation on Rice Production and Water Resource. Available at:
[16] Michailidou, A. V., Vlachokostas, C., and Moussiopoulos, Ν. 2016. Interactions between climate change and the tourism sector: Multiple-criteria decision analysis to assess mitigation and adaptation options in tourism areas. Tourism Management, 55: 1-12. DOI:
[17] Oki, T., and Kanae, S. 2006. Global hydrological cycles and world water resources. Science, 313(5790): 1068-1072. DOI:10.1126/science.1128845
[18] Savenije, H. H. G. 2000. Water scarcity indicators; the deception of the numbers. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Part B-Hydrology Oceans and Atmosphere, 25(3): 199-204. DOI:10.1016/S1464-1909(00)00004-6
[19] Sun, S. et al. 2016. Sustainability assessment of regional water resources under the DPSIR framework. Journal of Hydrology, 532: 140-148. DOI:
[20] Tscherning, K., Helming, K., Krippner, B., Sieber, S., and Paloma, S. G. y. 2012. Does research applying the DPSIR framework support decision making? Land Use Policy, 29: 102– 110.
[21] Vera, C. et al. 2010. Needs Assessment for Climate Information on Decadal Timescales and Longer. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 1: 275–286.
[22] VijayaVenkataRaman, S., Iniyan, S., and Goic, R. 2013. A review of climate change, mitigation and adaptation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16: 878-897.
[23] Xu, E. G. B., Leung, K. M. Y., Morton, B. and Lee, J. H. W. 2015. An integrated environmental risk assessment and management framework for enhancing the sustainability of marine protected areas: The Cape d'Aguilar Marine Reserve case study in Hong Kong. Science of the Total Environment, 505: 269-281.
[24] Zeng, Z., Liu, J., and Savenije, H. H. G. 2013. A simple approach to assess water scarcity integrating water quantity and quality. Ecological Indicators, 34: 441– 449.
[25] Zhou, S.-d., Mueller, F., Burkhard, B., Cao, X.-j., and Hou, Y. 2013. Assessing Agricultural Sustainable Development Based on the DPSIR Approach: Case Study in Jiangsu, China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(7): 1292-1299. DOI:
How to Cite
NOIMUNWA, Watcharapong; SINGHRUCK, Patama; SOMPONGCHAIYAKUL, Penjai. Participatory Approach on Water Scarcity Solutions in Pranburi Basin, Thailand. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 7, p. 1340-1348, feb. 2018. ISSN 2068-7729. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 03 oct. 2023. doi: