Environmental and Economic Model of an Aircraft Accident Evaluation

N. I. NIKOLAYKIN; N. E. NIKOLAYKINA; Vladimir Dmitriyevich SEKERIN; Anna Evgenevna GOROKHVA

doi:10.14505//jemt.v8.5(21).16

N. I. NIKOLAYKIN Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation, Moscow, Russian Federation
N. E. NIKOLAYKINA Moscow Polytechnic University, Moscow, Russian Federation
Vladimir Dmitriyevich SEKERIN Moscow Polytechnic University, Moscow, Russian Federation
Anna Evgenevna GOROKHVA Moscow Polytechnic University, Moscow, Russian Federation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v8.5(21).16

Abstract

Advantages of air transportation in the transport system of Russia are emphasized. An analysis of the environmental consequences of negative aircraft accidents with civil aviation aircrafts against the background of trends of the changing volume of air transportation is presented. It is shown that Russian civil aviation is described by a significant growth in traffic volumes with a slight deterioration in flight safety indicators today. It is alleged that the trend of significant growth in the volume of works is expected to continue in the future. With the obvious relevance of measures to improve flight safety, a need to significantly improve the environmental protection activities in the territory of the aircraft accident site is stated. Classification of the consequences as direct and indirect is proposed, as well as a model of the dynamics of negative impact factors. It is proposed to carry out the analysis of environmental consequences taking into consideration the theories of physical, chemical and geotechnical systems. Aircraft accidents are accompanied by the following activities: works on investigation of the causes and circumstances of the incident; works on the search and rescue of an aircraft in distress; works on rectification of the consequences, and others. It is proposed to determine the magnitude of the total damage from pollution as the size of a complex index of environmental impact, which takes the chemical, physical, biological and information components into consideration. It is found that decline in the volume of environmental costs can be achieved through carrying out the proposed preventive adjustments, which exclude the negative development of the situation to the forced critical adjustments. A methodology for calculating the necessary preventive adjustments is proposed and justified.

References

[1] Dudin, M.N., Lyasnikov, N.V., Sekerin, V.D., Gorohova, A.E. and Burlakov, V.V. 2016. Provision of Energy Security at the National Level in the Context of the Global Gas Transportation Industry Development. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 6(2): 234-242.
[2] Dudin, M.N., Lyasnikov, N.V., Sekerin, V.D., Gorokhova, A.E., Danko, T.P. and Bank, O.A. 2017. Technological Changes as the Development Factor of the Global and Russian Energy Sector. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy (IJEEP), 7(1): 209-215
[3] Gore, A. 2006. An Inconvenient Truth. The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do About It. Emmaus, Pennsylvania, USA: Rodale Press, 328 pp.
[4] Hupe, J. 2016. Environmental Report, ICAO. Available at: http://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/Pages/ENV2016.aspx (accessed: 09.02.2017).
[5] Ivanov, A.I. 2014. Dinamika faktorov riska proizvodstvennoy sredy pri nazemnom obsluzhivanii aviatsionnoy tekhniki [Dynamics of Risk Factors of Production Environment during Aeronautical Equipment Ground Servicing]. Academic Bulletin of the MSTU, 204: 44 - 49.
[6] Kartyshev, O.A. 2016. Using Ecoflight building software suite for predictive assessment and development of compensation measures to mitigate impacts of aircraft noise in areas near airports. ICAO Environmental Report, 56-59 pp.
[7] Nikolaikin, N.I. 2007. A Method of Ecological Estimation for Man-made Chemical and Greenhouse Gas Pollution. Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 43: 612 – 616.
[8] Nikolaykin, N.I. and Starkov, E.Yu. 2014. Aktualnost izucheniya vliyaniya aviatsionnykh proisshestviy na okruzhayushchuyu sredu [Relevance of studying the impact of aircraft accidents on the environment]. In the collection "URGENT PROBLEMS OF THE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT." Collection of articles of the International research-to-practice conference: in 6 parts. Ufa: Aetern, 125-132 pp.
[9] Schomer, P. 2017. Evaluating Methods for Determining Interior Noise Levels Used in Airport Sound Insulation Programs: ACRP Report. Washington: National Academy of Sciences, 150 pp.
[10] Seritt, Scott L. 2008. Recommendation for Approval Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport; Atlanta, Georgia: Airport Noise Compatibility program (NCP): Memorandum: 24/01/2008. Record of Approval FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program. FAA, Available at: https://www.faa.gov/airports/environmental/airport_noise/part_150/states/ga/media/roa_georgia_012408.pdf (accessed: 12.02.2017).
[11] Zubkov, B.V. 2013. Bezopasnost poletov [Flight safety]: textbook. Ulyanovsk: UCAI, 451 pp.
[12] Zubkov, B.V. 2014. Aviatsionnaya bezopasnost [Aviation security]: textbook. Ulyanovsk: UCAI, 411 pp.
*** Aviation and Global Atmosphere. 1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 388 pp.
*** Convention on International Civil Aviation – Doc 7300/8. International Civil Aviation Organization. Eighth Edition. Montréal, Quebec, Canada: ICAO 2000 12100, QIP117200, 51 pp.
*** International Civil Aviation Vocabulary – Doc 9713. Third Edition. Montréal, Quebec, Canada: ICAO July 2007. Order No 9713, 857 pp.
*** International Standards and Recommended Practices. Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation. Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. Ninth Edition. (July 2001) Montréal, Quebec, Canada: ICAO. Order Number: AN13, 35 pp.
*** International Standards and Recommended Practices. Environmental Protection. Volume I. Aircraft Noise. Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. Sixth Edition. (July 2011). Montréal, Quebec, Canada: ICAO. Order Number: AN16-1, 125 pp.
*** International Standards and Recommended Practices. Environmental Protection. Volume II. Aircraft Engine Emissions. Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. Third Edition. (July 2008). Montréal, Quebec, Canada: ICAO. Order Number: AN16-2, 132 pp.
*** International Standards and Recommended Practices. Safety Management. Annex 19 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. Second Edition. (July 2016). Montréal, Quebec, Canada: ICAO. Order Number: AN13, 47 pp.
*** Standard Guide for Field Measurements of Airborne Sound Insolation of Building Facades and Façade Elements.” ASTM International Standard E966-10. ASTM, (2011). Available at: https://www.astm.org/DATABASE.CART/HISTORICAL/ E966-10.htm (accessed: 12.02.2017).