Ethnic Cultural Tourism Resources Evaluation and Development: Kazakh Cultural Tourism Resources Analysis
Abstract
Evaluation of tourism resources of national culture requires effective development of ethnic cultural tourism resources and identification of the development of the main body as well as provision of a scientific basis for decision-making. At the present, commonly used practice of tourism development methods in our country are qualitative evaluation and quantitative evaluation. In most cases, those methods are only applicable for the natural tourism resources, but that is not a perfect assessment method for ethnic cultural tourism resources. Based on the results of previous studies, this article attempts to use a new method on tourism resources evaluation of Kazakh ethnic cultural resources, whereby mainly adopts qualitative index and quantitative index from the fuzzy evaluation method. The method of qualitative evaluation is often based on the expert’s wealthy experience and knowledge, and their results are always partial to decision-making demand of the expert. Therefore, their evaluation results belong to the kind of subjective evaluation. Quantitative evaluation method is trying to make the resources assessment more objective and accurate, but the evaluation of the impact of the subjective factors is unavoidable. To reduce the influence of human factor for the evaluation, the result has to suit achievable measures, which adjust measures to local conditions on index extraction, method selection and model building and to make every effort to correspond to reality, to be objective, and to be accurate evaluation. A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is a kind of fuzzy reasoning based on the combination of qualitative and quantitative, exact and inexact unified evaluation method. This kind of method in cultural tourism resources evaluation has good theoretical guidance and practical operation.
References
[2] Biondo, A. E., and Bonaventura, L. 2014. Agricultural resources allocation and environmental sustainability. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, Volume V, Winter, 2(10): 105-113. DOI:10.14505/jemt.v5.2(10).01
[3] Huang Fojun. 2002. Study on Xinjiang folk cultural tourism resources development. Xinjiang Local Records, (4): 37-39. Available at: http://www.lunwentianxia.com/qikan_detail_qis/390186/
[4] Li Shuqun 2005. The development of Xinjiang ethnic culture tourism. Seek Truth from Facts, (2): 65-66. Available at: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SSQS200502021.htm
[5] Liu Hun 2007. Discussion on minority culture tourism development. Manchu Research, (1): 27-30. Available at: http://wenku.baidu.com/view/5a12f8df4028915f804dc243.html
[6] Lu, Jun and Zhang Wenxiang 2006. The thematic development of ethnic cultural tourism research. Journal of Guilin Institute of Tourism, 4: 496-500. Available at: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGZ2006 04027.htm
[7] Mirzahan, J. 2006. Kazakh cultural view. Xinjiang Juvenile Publishing House. ISBN:7228061780. Available at: http://baike.sogou.com/v76458114.htm?fromTitle
[8] Neigemet 2007. Mengzhani, problem. Chinese Kazakh Kazak. Chinese Traditional Culture, (5): 3-28. Available at: https://book.douban.com/subject/20320123/
[9] Omarov, E. 2003. “Kazakh Orkenieti”, Egemen Kazakhtsan: 11-21 Available at: http://www.dalanews.kz/ 9583
[10] Yan Shun 2001. Xinjiang tourism resources and its exploitation and utilization. Arid Land Geography, 24 (4): 297-304. Available at: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHDL200104001.htm
[11] Yang Zhaoping and Zhang Xiaolei 2001. The border area tourism development mode research. Economic Geography, 21 (3): 363-366. Available at: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJDL200103025.htm
Copyright© 2023 The Author(s). Published by ASERS Publishing 2023. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of CC-BY 4.0 license.