Analysis of the Touristic Recreational Potential of a Territory as a Condition for Development of Ecological Tourism (the Southern Moscow Region Case Study)

  • Vitali Ju. IVLEV Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russia
  • Marina I. IVLEVA Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russia
  • Aleksandr I. PANYUKOV Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russia
  • Teymur E. ZULFUGARZADE Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Background. One of the relevant trends of modern tourism development is ecological tourism, the root ideas of which are based on the provisions of environmental economics – an interdisciplinary scientific approach, widely spread at the moment, which integrates the achievements of economics, ecology and ethics. This objective of this article is to examine the conditions for the effective development of ecological tourism on the basis of the analysis of touristic and recreational potential of the territory of the Southern Moscow region and to establish its influence on the prospects of the touristic activity in the region.


Method. The main approach to examining this problem in the article is the principle of unity of ecology, economics and culture which provides an opportunity to examine the pre-requisites for recreational potential of the territory in a versatile manner. While conducting the research presented in the article methods of analysis and classification of factual information and the method of scaling for ranking the territories with different recreational potential were applied.


Findings. This article defines the notion of a recreational potential of the territory as a combination of pre-requisites for organization of recreational activity, presents a classification of recreational resources as a basis of a recreational potential, and specifies their content. The article argues that the recreational areas formation principle shall involve the dependency between the environmental value and the degree of anthropogenic impact on it: the higher the environmental value is, the less the anthropogenic interference should be, as well as the environmental protection measures defined more clearly. In order to examine the touristic and recreational potential of the Moscow region the article features the analysis of the natural recreational resources, including climatic and geographical characteristics, involving the cultural and historical ones, providing the analysis of the material base for tourism development. The article develops the criteria of touristic and recreational potential, which include the presence of natural resources, cultural and historical resources, number of facilities for tourists' catering and accommodation, availability of transport system, and places of resort, entertainment and culture. Based on these criteria the territory districts groups with similar potential and efficiency of its use are identified; conclusions on positive and negative sides of touristic and recreational potential of the study territory, as well as on the prospects of the ecological tourism, are made.


Improvements. The materials of this study have practical value for the analysis and evaluation of efficiency of the territories' use with objective of the ecological tourism development and enhancement of the region's touristic value.

References

[1] Anikina, А.V. 2015. Rural tourism: possible prospects. Sochi Journal of Economy, 1 (34): 69-75.
[2] Baryshnikova, Е.M. 2013. Ecological tourism as a component of the territory's image formation. Herald of the Altai State Agricultural University, 6 (104): 123-126.
[3] Batat, W., and Prentovic, S. 2014. Towards viral systems thinking: a cross-cultural study of sustainable tourism ads. Kybernetes, 43(3/4): 529 – 546. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/K-07-2013-0147
[4] Bergh van den, J.C.J.M. 1996. Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development: Theory, Methods, and Application. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. DOI.10.1177/107049659600500310
[5] Brackenbury, M. 1993. Responsible marketing of ecotourism destinations and attractions: A commercial sector perspective. The Tourist Review, 48 (3): 21 – 24. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb058128
[6] Costanza, R. (ed) 1991. Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York.
[7] Daly, H.E. 1996. Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development. Beacon Press, Boston.
[8] Fabijanic, T.C., and Klaric, Z. 1993. Ecotourism in national parks and protected areas - regional park of central Istria: Needs and conceptual answers for economic development in a protected area. The Tourist Review, 48 (3): 13 – 17. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb058126
[9] Hall, C.M., and Lew, A. 1998. Sustainable Tourism Development: Geographical Perspectives. Addison-Wesley Longman, London.
[10] Ivlev, V.Yu., Barkova, E.V., Ivleva, M.I., and Buzskaya, O.M. 2016. Environmental approach to the study of the modern stage of information society development: Research prospects. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(16): 9113-9124
[11] Jayawardena, C., Patterson, D.J., Choi, C. and Brain, R. 2008. Sustainable tourism development in Niagara. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20(3): 258 – 277. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09596110810866082
[12] Kurguzov, V.L. 2013. Ecological tourism as a factor of preservation and use of cultural and natural heritage. Problems of Socio-Economical Development of Siberia, 1 (11): 108-114.
[13] Naess, A. 1972. The Shallow and the Deep Long-Range Ecology Movement: A Summary. Inquiry, 16 (1): 95-100.
[14] Norgaard, R.B. 1994. Development Betrayed: The End of Progress and a Coevolutionary Revisioning of the Future. Routledge, London.
[15] Odum, H.T. 1971. Environment, Power and Society. Wiley, New York.
[16] Pereira, E.M.V., Mykletun, R.J., and Hippolyte, C. 2012. Sustainability, daily practices and vacation purchasing: are they related? Tourism Review, 67 (4): 40 – 54. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/16605371211277812
[17] Pesonen, О., Komppula, R., Kronenberg, C. and Peters, M. 2011. Understanding the relationship between push and pull motivations in rural tourism. Tourism Review, 66(3): 32 – 49. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/16605371111175311
[18] Rodoman, B.B. 2012. Possibilities of esthetic education in ecological tourism. Modern Problems of Service and Tourism, 1: 102-108.
[19] Semochkina, S.S., and Maksimova, N.B. 2012. Ecological tourism and evaluation of the facilities of touristic and recreational use on the left bank of the Ob' river in Altai Territory. Herald of the Altai State Agricultural University, 10 (96): 78-80.
[20] Starikova, D.V., and Kogay, Е.А. 2011. Ecological tourism as a factor of public environmental awareness formation. Proceedings of Russian State Social University, 6: 92-95.
[21] Verbeek, D.H.P., Bargeman, A. and Mommaas, J.T. 2011. A sustainable tourism mobility passage. Tourism Review, 66 (4): 45 – 53. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/16605371111188731
[22] Yuan, Y.Y. 2013. Adding environmental sustainability to the management of event tourism. International Journal of Culture. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 7(2): 175 – 183. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJCTHR-04-2013-0024
Published
2017-06-18
How to Cite
IVLEV, Vitali Ju. et al. Analysis of the Touristic Recreational Potential of a Territory as a Condition for Development of Ecological Tourism (the Southern Moscow Region Case Study). Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 2, p. 373-384, june 2017. ISSN 2068-7729. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/1192>. Date accessed: 24 apr. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v8.2(18).10.