Organizational Behavior and Technology Adoption in Primary Education: Budgetary Trade-Offs and Economic Implications of iPad Purchases

Abstract

A one-to-one device program does more than place hardware in classrooms; it converts a purchase decision into a multiyear operating commitment. This article examines whether school districts absorb that commitment through new capacity, displacement of existing services, or both. Financial, enrollment, demographic, procurement, and assessment records from 610 Pennsylvania and Ohio districts provide 3,000 district-year financial observations and 1,175,000 student-years. Treatment begins when a district crosses a prespecified threshold for large-scale iPad deployment. Because implementation occurs in different years, the primary analysis estimates cohort- and time-specific effects using Callaway and Sant’Anna’s approach, with district-clustered inference; conventional two-way fixed-effects estimates and Goodman-Bacon diagnostics serve as transparency checks. Adoption reduced instructional spending by 1.85 percentage points and teacher compensation by $280.40 per pupil while increasing information-technology operating cost by $145.80 and capital expenditure by $310.20 per pupil. Mathematics achievement declined by 0.045 standard deviations, attendance fell by 0.35 percentage points, and suspensions increased by 0.42 percentage points. The reading estimate was small and statistically imprecise. Robustness estimates were directionally stable, and joint pre-trend tests did not reject parallel pre-adoption trends. The findings support a capacity-centered account of educational technology: returns depend not simply on device access, but on whether districts can finance recurring obligations, adapt work systems, and preserve core instructional inputs during implementation.

References

Bulman, G., & Fairlie, R. W. (2016). Technology and education: Computers, software, and the internet. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 5, pp. 239–280). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63459-7.00005-1
Callaway, B., & Sant’Anna, P. H. C. (2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001
Canavesi, A., Bertolotti, F., Cattaneo, L., Buonanno, G., Mari, L., & Ravarini, A. (2025). From developers to players: Exploring the dual impact of game-based learning on student engagement, learning and skill development. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, 16(2), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.14505/jres.v16.2(20).01
Escueta, M., Quan, V., Nickow, A. J., & Oreopoulos, P. (2020). Education technology: An evidence-based review. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(4), 897–996. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191507
Goodman-Bacon, A. (2021). Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 254–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014
Hershkovitz, A., Merceron, A., & Shamaly, A. (2019). The role of pedagogy in one-to-one computing lessons: A quantitative observational study of teacher–student interactions. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 77(274), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.22550/rep77-3-2019-05
Hull, M., & Duch, K. (2017). One-to-one technology and student outcomes (IZA Discussion Paper No. 10886). IZA Institute of Labor Economics. https://docs.iza.org/dp10886.pdf
Jackson, C. K., Johnson, R. C., & Persico, C. (2016). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 157–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv036
Kirkpatrick, L., Brown, H. M., Searle, M., Sauder, A. E., & Smiley, E. (2017). The impact of a school board’s one-to-one iPad initiative on equity and inclusion. Exceptionality Education International, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v27i2.7751
Krumsvik, R. J., Berrum, E., Jones, L. Ø., & Gulbrandsen, I. P. (2021). Implementing tablets in Norwegian primary schools: Examining outcome measures in the second cohort. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 642686. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.642686
Licwinko, K. N. (2020). Building inclusive learning environments with 1:1 devices. Journal of Special Education Technology, 36(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420923069
O’Rourke, J., Main, S., & Hill, S. (2017). Technology in the classroom: Improving automaticity in mental maths in primary-aged students. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(10), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n10.4
Reis-Andersson, J. (2023). Leading the digitalisation process in K–12 schools: The school leaders’ perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 2585–2604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11935-x
Sun, L., & Abraham, S. (2021). Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.006
Published
2026-09-30
How to Cite
ROSADO, Walter L.; ALBRIGHT, Theodore J.. Organizational Behavior and Technology Adoption in Primary Education: Budgetary Trade-Offs and Economic Implications of iPad Purchases. Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields, [S.l.], v. 17, n. 3, p. 913 - 922, sep. 2026. ISSN 2068-7710. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/tpref/article/view/9675>. Date accessed: 03 oct. 2026. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/tpref.v17.3(39).20.