Integrating LGBTI Inclusivity and Innovative Capacity in India: Analyzing the Effects of Globalization
Abstract
Globalization can have enormous effects if LGBTI people are well blended into the pool of resources and tapped efficiently. This research investigates LGBTI inclusivity and the effects of globalization on economic development since the 2009 legalization verdict favoring homosexuality. The theoretical prospects are trifold: trade liberalization and labor market de-regulation; Becker’s theory of discrimination; and Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson postulate, along with a diagrammatic representation showcasing the impact of LGBTI inclusivity in the labor market. An OLS approach in conjunction to the ECI_Trade and ECI_Technology has been employed to examine the integration of LGBTI individuals into the Indian economy considering capital stock, domestic credit, employment, population and human capital as default controls to the model and year dummies have been incorporated at a later stage of modelling to highlight the precision level. The study found that LGBTI inclusivity is positively correlated with India's ECI_Trade and ECI_Technology value, increasing it approximately by 6.3% and 15.4%. Further, a number of robustness checks show that even after accounting for macroeconomic variables as default controls, the positive association continues to persist. The LGBTI inclusivity increases the ECI_Trade value by 13.2% and ECI_Technology value by 24.4%, respectively. Consequently, the authors emphasized on the economic ramifications of inclusivity in relation to wage gaps, discrimination, and the development of human capital and have tried to exemplify the integration of LGBTI individuals in EPZs, trade and technological advancement, and skill development to justify the default conceptualized postulates in support of inclusivity.
References
[2] Badgett, M.V.L, Waaldijk, K. and van der Meulen Rodgers, Y. (2019). The Relationship Between LGBT Inclusion and Economic Development: Macro-Level Evidence. World Development, 120 (March): 1–14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.03.011
[3] Becker, G. S. (1957). The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago. Available at: http://bibliotecadigital.econ.uba.ar/download/Pe/187894.pdf.
[4] Berik, G. (2000). Mature Export-Led Growth and Gender Wage Inequality in Taiwan. Feminist Economics, 6 (3): 1–26. DOI: 10.1080/135457000750020119
[5] Bhagwati, Jagdish. (2021). Free Trade Today. Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv1j666p2
[6] Black, Sandra E., and Elizabeth Brainerd. (2004). Importing Equality? The Impact of Globalization on Gender Discrimination. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 57 (4): 540. DOI: 10.2307/4126682
[7] Borloz, V.B. (2023). Protection against Violence and Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. New York. https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n23/218/47/pdf/n2321847.pdf.
[8] Bos, F. (2023). 5 Reasons Why Gender Must Be Considered in Innovation. UNICEF. March 7. https://unu.edu/vie/news/5-reasons-why-gender-must-be-considered-innovation.
[9] Busse, M., and Spielmann, C. (2006). Gender Inequality and Trade*. Review of International Economics, 14 (3): 362–79. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9396.2006.00589.x
[10] Çaðatay, N. (2005). Gender Inequalities and International Trade: A Theoretical Reconsideration. Uruguay. Available at: https://www.ciedur.org.uy/adm/archivos/publicacion_101.pdf
[11] Card, D., and Dinardo, J. E. (2001). Technology and U.S. Wage Inequality: A Brief Look. In Explanations for Rising Economic Inequality. London: Royal Statistical Society. Available at: https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/tech%20wage%20inequ.pdf
[12] Chandra, N. K. (1986). Theories of Unequal Exchange: A Critique of Emmanuel and Amin. Economic and Political Weekly, 21 (30): PE77-84. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4375938
[13] Cuddington, J. T., Ludema, R. and Jayasuriya, S. A. (2002). Prebisch-Singer Redux. 6. A. Washington, DC. Available at: https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/EC0206A.pdf
[14] Data Wheel. (2023). India: Economic Complexity Index. Observatory of Economic Complexity. Available at: https://oec.world/en/profile/country/ind
[15] Davis. (2024). Index of Human Capital per Person for India [HCIYISINA066NRUG]. University of Groningen and University of California. St. Louis: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. August 10. Available at: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/HCIYISINA066NRUG
[16] Dix-Carneiro, R. (2014). Trade Liberalization and Labor Market Dynamics. Econometrica, 82 (3): 825–85. DOI:10.3982/ECTA10457
[17] Duflo, E. (2012). Women Empowerment and Economic Development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50 (4): 1051–79. DOI: 10.1257/jel.50.4.1051
[18] Economic and Political Weekly. (2013). The Third Sex: Transgender Persons in India Want to Be Treated as Citizens. Is This Too Much to Ask For? Economic and Political Weekly, 48(43): 9–9. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23528827
[19] Gajjalapurna, M., and Irshad, S. (2023). Human Capital Development for Women: A Case for Closing the Global Gender Gap. World Economic Forum. June 29. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/06/human-capital-development-for-women-a-case-for-closing-the-global-gender-gap/#:~:text=Furthermore%2C%20women%20account%20for%20only,consistent%20and%20equitable%20earning%20potential.
[20] Knowles, S. (2002). Are Educational Gender Gaps a Brake on Economic Development? Some Cross-Country Empirical Evidence. Oxford Economic Papers, 54 (1): 118–49. DOI: 10.1093/oep/54.1.118
[21] Korinek, J, Moïsé, E. and Tange, J. (2021). Trade and Gender: A Framework of Analysis. Paris. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1787/6db59d80-en
[22] Marzia, F., Joekes S., and Masika, R. (1998). Global Trade Expansion and Liberalization: Gender Issues and Impacts. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236873521_Global_trade_expansion_and_liberalisation_Gender_issues_and_impacts
[23] McCallum, J. and Jamie, K. (2011). Export Processing Zones: Comparative Data from China, Honduras, Nicaragua and South Africa. 21. Geneva. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_dialogue/@dialogue/documents/publication/wcms_158364.pdf
[24] Mikić, M. (1998). Heckscher – Ohlin - Samuelson Model. In International Trade, 52–130. London: Macmillan Education UK. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-26372-1_2
[25] Nayyar, D. (2000). Globalization and Development Strategies. In High-Level Round Table on Trade and Development: Directions for the Twenty-First Century. Bangkok: UNCTAD. Available at: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ux_tdxrt1d4.en.pdf
[26] Raquel, A., and Cunningham W. (2002). Effects of Trade Liberalization on the Gender Wage Gap in Mexico (English). 34144. 21. Washington, D.C. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/860271468049793708/Effects-of-trade-liberalization-on-the-gender-wage-gap-in-Mexico.
[27] Rocha, N., and Piermartini, R. (2023). Trade Drives Gender Equality and Development. FandD: IMF, June. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2023/06/trade-drives-gender-equality-and-development-rocha-piermartini.
[28] Seguino, S. (2000). Gender Inequality and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Analysis. World Development, 28 (7): 1211–30. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00018-8
[29] Simoes, A.J.G, and Hidalgo, C.A. (2011). The Economic Complexity Observatory: An Analytical Tool for Understanding the Dynamics of Economic Development. Workshops at the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. August. Available at: https://oec.world/en/resources/terms
[30] Sukthankar, A., and Gopalakrishnan, R. (2012). Freedom of Association for Women Workers in EPZs : A Manual. Vol. 1. Geneva: International Labor Office. Available: https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@gender/documents/publication/wcms_186807.pdf
[31] Vu, T. V. (2022). Linking LGBT Inclusion and National Innovative Capacity. Social Indicators Research, 159 (1): 191–214. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-021-02743-2
[32] UN Inter-Agency Network on Women and Gender Equality Task Force on Gender and Trade. (2004). Trade and Gender: Opportunities and Challenges for Developing Countries. 2. EDM. Geneva, New York. Available at: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/edm20042_en.pdf
[33] UN Women. (2019). Innovation for Gender Equality. New York. Available at: https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/Headquarters/Attachments/Sections/Library/Publications/2019/Innovation-for-gender-equality-en.pdf.
[34] World Bank. (2024). World Development Indicators Database. World Bank. Washington, DC: World Bank. March 28. Available at: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators#
[35] World Bank, and WTO. (2020). Women and Trade: The Role of Trade in Promoting Gender Equality. Washington, DC: World Bank. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1541-6
[36] World Economic Forum. (2022). Global Gender Gap Report 2022. Cologny. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2022.pdf
Non-Exclusive License under Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC BY 4.0):
This ‘Article’ is distributed under the terms of the license CC-BY 4.0., which lets others distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon this article, even commercially, as long as they credit this article for the original creation. ASERS Publishing will be acknowledged as the first publisher of the Article and a link to the appropriate bibliographic citation (authors, article title, volume issue, page numbers, DOI, and the link to the Published Article on ASERS Publishing’ Platform) must be maintained.