The Influence of the Digital State on Preventing and Detecting Corruption in Ukraine

Abstract

The impact of state processes digitalization on preventing and detecting corruption in Ukraine is a key aspect for understanding the effectiveness of governance and the development of modern strategies in the fight against corruption. The utilization of digital technologies has the potential to substantially enhance transparency and diminish corruption hazards within governmental frameworks. The purpose of the article is to examine this effect in relation to contemporary challenges and opportunities. The article demonstrates that digital systems integration, such as e-declaration and e-procurement, assists in mitigating prospects for corrupt practices and increases citizens' trust in government. Correlation analysis shows the relationship between digitalization level and anti-corruption measures’ effectiveness, emphasizing the importance of technological innovations in public administration. The obtained results of the correlation analysis show a connection at the level of 0.438, which indicates a moderate positive correlation between digitalization level of government processes and corruption decrease. The recommendations point to the need for an integrated approach where digital intervention is combined with other anti-corruption measures, including legal reforms and public engagement, to attain more substantial outcomes in the fight against corruption. The conclusions of the article highlight the significance of advancing digital infrastructure and legislative support for digital initiatives. The article draws attention to the imperative need to integrate digital strategies with the comprehensive anti-corruption policy in order to maximize their effectiveness and positive impact on society.

References

[1] Aldieri, Luigi, Cristian Barra, Nazzareno Ruggiero, and Concetto (2023). Corruption and firms' efficiency: International evidence using an instrumental variable approach. Economia Politica, 40(2): 731–759. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-022-00267-7
[2] Anishchenko, Mykhailo, and Viktor Oharenko (2023). Economic justification of corruption risks in the field of healthcare. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 9(2): 40–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2023-9-2-40-47
[3] Astakhov, Vladislav (2023). Comparison of public administration policy and administration in the field of struggle with corruption in Ukraine and Singapore. Public Administration and State Security Aspects, 1: 88–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52363/passa-2023.1-10
[4] Bahoo, Salman, Ilan Alon, Josanco Floreani, and Marco Cucculelli (2023). Corruption, formal institutions, and foreign direct investment: The case of OECD countries in Africa. Thunderbird International Business Review, 65(5): 461–483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22361
[5] Balliu, Alesia (2023). Fight corruption the EU membership requirement: The case of Albania. European Scientific Journal, 19(23): 25–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2023.v19n23p25
[6] Bratić, Vjekoslav, Martina Pezer, and Stanić Branko (2023). Asset declarations – an effective corruption prevention instrument in Southeast Europe or paper tiger? IPF Notes, 16(130): 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3326/in.2023.130
[7] Cazacu, Mihai, Alexandra Horobet, Marinela-Luminita-Emanuela Zlatea, and Lucian Belasco (2023). Researching the impact of corruption and organized crime on FDI in Europe: A literature review. Economies of the Balkan and Eastern European Countries, KnE Social Sciences, 2023: 1–15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i1.12631
[8] Corrado, Germana, Luisa Corrado, Giuseppe De Michele, Francesco and Salustri (2023). Are perceptions of corruption matching experience? Evidence from microdata. The British Journal of Criminology, 63(3): 687–708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac025
[9] Cozma, Adeline-Cristina et al. (2023). Corruption, deforestation, and tourism – European case study. Heliyon, 9(8): E19075. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19075
[10] Guo, Qingram et al. (2023). The roles of organic farming, renewable energy, and corruption on the biodiversity crisis: A European perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(11): 31696–31710. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24344-3
[11] Hrudovenko, O. S. (2022). Administrative and legal status of the department for the prevention and detection of corruption of the ministry of defense of Ukraine. Actual Problems of Native Jurisprudence, 4: 79–83. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32782/3922123
[12] Kalienichenko, L. I., and Slynko, D. V. (2022). Concept, features and types of corruption. Law and Safety, 84(1): 39–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2022.1.04
[13] Kanojia, Siddharth, Ojha, Shashi Bhushan, and Muzaffar Hussian Mir (2023). Scrutinizing anti-corruption initiatives in Europe: Lessons to learn for India? Journal of Liberty and International Affairs. Institute for Research and European Studies, 9(2): 469–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47305/JLIA2392629k
[14] Karpacheva, E., and Hock, B. (2023). Foreign whistleblowing: The impact of US extraterritorial enforcement on anti-corruption laws in Europe. Journal of Financial Crime, 31(1): 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2022-0283
[15] Kolomoiets, Tatiana, and Oleksii Makarenkov (2021). Digital intervention in legal mechanisms for detecting the proceeds of corruption. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 7(5): 235–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-5-235-242
[16] Kornienko, M., and Tertyshnyk, V. (2021). Anti-corruption: Strategy and practice. Problems of Legality, 152: 87–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.152.226127
[17] Kubbe, Inna, and Stoyan Panov (2023). Corruption in Europe. Edited by Chandan Kumar Jha, Ajit Mishra, Sudipta Sarangi. The Political Economy of Corruption. Routledge, 189–215. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003142300-13
[18] Letki, Natalia, Maciej A. Górecki, and Adam Gendźwiłł (2023). ‘They accept bribes; we accept bribery’: Conditional effects of corrupt encounters on the evaluation of public institutions. British Journal of Political Science, 53(2): 690–697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123422000047
[19] Loishyna, Natalia et al. (2019). Compliance control of conflict of interests in the general system of internal control and resource management. Journal of Scientific Papers ‘Social Development and Security’, 9(5): 58–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2019.9.5.4
[20] Maslii, Natalia et al. (2018). Modern technologies of detection and prevention of corruption in emerging information society. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(1): 58–67. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(1).2018.06
[21] Miliienko, Olena (2023). Public-Private Partnership as a Paradigm for Building Socially Responsible Business: Successful Implementation and Plotting of Corruption Schemes and Related Criminal Liability. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 15(3): 337-354.
[22] Miroshnyk, M., Shevchuk, A., Kalitnyk, M., and Pikul, R. (2023). Study of problem issues regarding the implementation of measures for the prevention and detection of corruption in the armed forces of Ukraine during a special period. International Scientific Journal ‘Internauka’, 15(149): 1–15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.25313/2520-2057-2023-15-9166
[23] Mmakwena, Modipa, Sandie Masuku Clement, and Kholofelo Annah Rakubu (2023). Corruption within the traffic police environment: Challenges and possible solutions. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 15(4): 533–549.
[24] Motuzna, A. V., and Reznik, M. O. (2022). Theoretical and legal bases of research of legalization of criminal proceedings and directions of their detection. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 3: 117–120. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2021.03.21
[25] Pchelina, O. (2022). On the question of criminal procedural regulation of the term ‘electronic assets obtained by criminal route.’ Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 71: 327–332. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2022.71.55
[26] Shevchenko, Nataliia, Marta Kopytko, and Iryna Mihus (2023). Directions of decreasing the level of corruption in Ukraine in the conditions of crisis phenomena and increasing the need for legalization of income. Scientific Notes of the University’KROK’ 2: 21–28. DOI: 10.31732/2663-2209-2022-70-21-28
[27] Shovkun, Yurii (2023). The subject composition of control over compliance by public servants with the legal restrictions established for them. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 4: 292–296. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.49
[28] Shylo, S. (2023). Peculiarities of the application of legislation on the prevention of corruption in the conditions of martial law. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 2(74): 86–93. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2022.74.48
[29] Sokolenko, Liudmyla (2023). The conceptual significance of internal audit in the armed forces of Ukraine. Form and Finance, 1(99): 49–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33146/2307-9878-2023-1(99)-49-55
[30] Tavolzhanskyi, Oleksii et al. (2023). Anti-Corruption Legislation of Certain Member States of the European Union: Theory and Practice. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 15(1): 31-48.
[31] Tokarieva, K. O., and Golub, M. V. (2023). Peculiarities of some law enforcement agencies' activities: National and foreign experience. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 101(2): 84–95. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32631/v.2023.2.08
[32] Tsymbalenko, Ya (2021). The origin of authorized person for corruption prevention and detection institute establishing in Ukraine. Law and Public Administration, 1: 271–278. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32840/pdu.2021.1.40
[33] Vasylchyshyn, Oleksandra (2021). Financial crimes in the fiscal sphere as a threat to the economic security of Ukraine. World of Finance, 1(66): 124–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/sf2021.01.124
[34] Statista (2023). Annual aggregate digital economy and society index (DESI) scores for European Union member states from 2017 to 2022. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1372137/eu-digitalization-desi-member-states/
[35] Transparency International (2023). Corruption Perceptions Index. Available at: https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023
Published
2024-06-28
How to Cite
KOBETS, Yuliia et al. The Influence of the Digital State on Preventing and Detecting Corruption in Ukraine. Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields, [S.l.], v. 15, n. 2, p. 365-374, june 2024. ISSN 2068-7710. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/tpref/article/view/8472>. Date accessed: 13 july 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/tpref.v15.2(30).16.