RUSSIA. THE BACKGROUND OF THE RUSSIAN INVASION OF UKRAINE

Hardy HANAPPI

doi:10.14505/tpref.v13.2(26).02

Hardy HANAPPI VIPER - Vienna Institute for Political Economy Research, Austria

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505/tpref.v13.2(26).02

Abstract

This paper presents an interpretation of the underlying dynamics of global political economy, which has led to the invasion of Ukraine by Russia in February 2022. It thus is an alternative to interpretations that view the individual psychological traits of Vladimir Putin as the driving force behind this event. To enable a more sensible account, it turns out to be necessary to go back in the history of the conflict between Russia and NATO to the times of the Cold War. Briefly, two important fields of methodology – a theory of power and game theory – have to be touched upon. Finally, the justified emotional disgust concerning Putin’s aggressive war and the somewhat more detached scientific analysis are tried to be reconciled in the concluding paragraphs.

References

[1] Axelrod, R. and Hamilton, D.H. 1981. The Evolution of Cooperation. Science, New Series, 211(4489): 1390-1396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7466396
[2] Brams, S. J. and Kilgour, D. M. 1985. Optimal Deterrence. Social Philosophy & Policy, 3 118-135.
[3] Brams, S. J. and Kilgour, D. M. 1987. Is Nuclear Deterrence Rational, and Will Star Wars Help?, Analyse & Kritik 9, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen. Available at: https://www.analyse-und-kritik.net/Dateien/56c2ff79e2227_ak_brams_kilgour_1987.pdf
[4] Dahl, R. 1957. The Concept of Power. Behavioral Science, 2(3): 201-215. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830020303
[5] Dixit, A. and Skeath, S. 1999. Games of Strategy. W.W. Norton, New York, London.
[6] Ferreira, J. L. 2020. Game Theory. An Applied Introduction, Macmillan International, Red Globe Press, London.
[7] Hanappi, H. and Scholz-Wäckerle, M. 2017. Evolutionary Political Economy: Content and Methods. Forum for Social Economics, Spring 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2017.1287748
[8] Hanappi, H. 1992. The Future of the USSR. A simulation of macroeconomic transition scenarios, paper presented at the 33rd annual meeting of the Atlantic Economic Association, Nice, 5-9.4.1992.
[9] Hanappi, H. 2019a. From Integrated Capitalism to Disintegrating Capitalism. Scenarios of a Third World War. American Review of Political Economy, 14(1). Available at: https://www.scirea.org/journal/PaperInformation?PaperID=1380
[10] Hanappi, H. 2019b. Classes - From National to Global Class Formation, introductory chapter of the open access book with the same title edited by Hanappi H., Intech Publishers (UK).
[11] Hanappi, H. 2020a. Alarm. The evolutionary jump of global political economy needed. Real World Economics Review, 94. Available at: http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue94/Hanappi94.pdf
[12] Hanappi, H. 2020b. A Global Revolutionary Class will ride the Tiger of Alienation. Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 18(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v18i1.1138
[13] Kennan, G. F. 2014. The Kennan Diaries, edited by Frank Costigliola, W. W. Norton, New York.
[14] Kilgour, D.M. and Zagare, F.C. 2007. Explaining Limited Conflicts. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 24: 65-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07388940601102852
[15] Lebow, R. N. 2018. The Rise and Fall of Political Orders. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[16] Mearsheimer, J. J. 2003. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (Updated Edition), W.W. Norton, New York.
[17] Quackenbush, S.L. 2015. International Conflict. Logic and Evidence, CQ Press Inc, Sage Publications.
[18] Rapaport, A. 1970. N-Person Game Theory. Ann Arbor University of Michigan Press.
[19] Zagare, F. C. 2018. Game Theory, Diplomatic History and Security Studies. Oxford University Press, London.
[20] Zagare, F. 2021. Multilateral Arms Races, in: New Frontiers in Conflict Management and Peace Economics: With a Focus on Human Security, Emerald publishers.