Some Efficiency Aspects of Monopolistic Competition: Innovation, Variety and Transaction Costs

  • Tamara TODOROVA American University in Bulgaria, Bulgaria

Abstract

We stress some efficiency aspects of monopolistic competition justifying it on account of its tendency to innovate and the questionable excess capacity paradigm. Some further efficiency aspects revealed are product variety and transaction cost savings. We view the monopolistically competitive firm as an essential source of technological innovation, product variety and cost economies. While perfect competition is universally considered a benchmark and a social optimum, we consider it a strongly unrealistic theoretical setup where the monopolistically, rather than the perfectly, competitive firm turns out to be the true type of competition and social optimum in the real world of positive transaction costs. The monopolistically competitive firm not only offers product variety and innovation but is the optimal institutional arrangement under positive transaction costs.


 

References

[1] Arrow, K. J. 1962. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention in The Rate and Direction of Economic Activities: Economic and Social Factors, Richard Nelson, ed., Princeton University Press, pp. 609-626, ISBN: 0-87014-304-2.
[2] Baumol, W.J. 1964. Monopolistic Competition and Welfare Economics. The American Economic Review, 54(3), Papers and Proceedings of the Seventy-sixth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, (May, 1964), pp. 44-52. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1818488
[3] Chamberlin, E.H. 1947. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 5th ed.
[4] Coase, R.H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm. Economica, New Series, 4: 386-405. DOI:http://doi.org/10.2307/2626876
[5] Demsetz, H. 1982. Barriers to Entry. The American Economic Review, 72: 47-57, DOI:http://www.jstor.org/stable/1808574
[6] Dixit, A.K and Stiglitz, J.E. 1977. Monopolistic Competition and Optimal Product Diversity. The American Economic Review, 67(3): 297-308. DOI: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1831401
[7] Eggertsson, T. 1990. Economic Behavior and Institutions: Principles of Neoinstitutional Economics (Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609404
[8] Harrod, R.F. 1952. Theory of Imperfect Competition Revised. Economic Essays, ISBN: 978-1-349-01496-5.
[9] Robinson, J.V. 1933. The Economics of Imperfect Competition. London: Macmillan, 2nd edition, 1969, ISBN: 978-0-333-10289-3.
[10] Squires D. and Segerson K. (2020) Capacity and Capacity Utilization in Production Economics. In: Ray S., Chambers R., Kumbhakar S. (eds) Handbook of Production Economics. Springer, Singapore. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3450-3_7-1
[11] Stigler, G.J. 1968. The Theory of Price, New York: Macmillan, 3rd edition, ISBN: 978-0024174000.
[12] Williamson, O.E. 1979. Transaction-cost Economics: the Governance of Contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22: 233–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/466942
[13] Williamson, O.E. 1989. Book Review for ‘The Firm, the Market and the Law’. California Law Review, 77: 223-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3480533
Published
2021-12-31
How to Cite
TODOROVA, Tamara. Some Efficiency Aspects of Monopolistic Competition: Innovation, Variety and Transaction Costs. Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 2, p. 82 - 88, dec. 2021. ISSN 2068-7710. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/tpref/article/view/6722>. Date accessed: 17 may 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/tpref.v12.2(24).02.