Some Efficiency Aspects of Monopolistic Competition: Innovation, Variety and Transaction Costs
Abstract
We stress some efficiency aspects of monopolistic competition justifying it on account of its tendency to innovate and the questionable excess capacity paradigm. Some further efficiency aspects revealed are product variety and transaction cost savings. We view the monopolistically competitive firm as an essential source of technological innovation, product variety and cost economies. While perfect competition is universally considered a benchmark and a social optimum, we consider it a strongly unrealistic theoretical setup where the monopolistically, rather than the perfectly, competitive firm turns out to be the true type of competition and social optimum in the real world of positive transaction costs. The monopolistically competitive firm not only offers product variety and innovation but is the optimal institutional arrangement under positive transaction costs.
References
[2] Baumol, W.J. 1964. Monopolistic Competition and Welfare Economics. The American Economic Review, 54(3), Papers and Proceedings of the Seventy-sixth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, (May, 1964), pp. 44-52. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1818488
[3] Chamberlin, E.H. 1947. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 5th ed.
[4] Coase, R.H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm. Economica, New Series, 4: 386-405. DOI:http://doi.org/10.2307/2626876
[5] Demsetz, H. 1982. Barriers to Entry. The American Economic Review, 72: 47-57, DOI:http://www.jstor.org/stable/1808574
[6] Dixit, A.K and Stiglitz, J.E. 1977. Monopolistic Competition and Optimal Product Diversity. The American Economic Review, 67(3): 297-308. DOI: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1831401
[7] Eggertsson, T. 1990. Economic Behavior and Institutions: Principles of Neoinstitutional Economics (Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609404
[8] Harrod, R.F. 1952. Theory of Imperfect Competition Revised. Economic Essays, ISBN: 978-1-349-01496-5.
[9] Robinson, J.V. 1933. The Economics of Imperfect Competition. London: Macmillan, 2nd edition, 1969, ISBN: 978-0-333-10289-3.
[10] Squires D. and Segerson K. (2020) Capacity and Capacity Utilization in Production Economics. In: Ray S., Chambers R., Kumbhakar S. (eds) Handbook of Production Economics. Springer, Singapore. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3450-3_7-1
[11] Stigler, G.J. 1968. The Theory of Price, New York: Macmillan, 3rd edition, ISBN: 978-0024174000.
[12] Williamson, O.E. 1979. Transaction-cost Economics: the Governance of Contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22: 233–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/466942
[13] Williamson, O.E. 1989. Book Review for ‘The Firm, the Market and the Law’. California Law Review, 77: 223-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3480533
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.