PUBLIC SPENDING AND ECONOMIC WELFARE IN ECOWAS COUNTRIES: DOES LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT MATTER?

  • R. Santos ALIMI Adekunle Ajasin University, Ondo State, Nigeria

Abstract

Conflicting views on the sign of the relationship between government size and economic development have resulted into the testing of non-monotonic relationship in the literature. Therefore, the total effect of growing public spending on economic development is ambiguous. This study investigated how government size affect economic development and determine the optimal government size that promotes economic development in ECOWAS countries. The study employed secondary data covering the period 1986 to 2018.  Data on Gross Domestic Product per capita, government size, population growth rate, inflation rate, gross fixed capital formation and financial development variables were sourced from World Development indicator database. The study constructed social welfare function as development indicator. Data were analysed using Least Absolute Deviation (LAD) regression and quantile regression (QR). The findings showed that quantile regression estimates are negative and significant (p < 0.05) in low quantiles, thus suggesting that deleterious effect of government size is more pronounced among countries with low level of economic development.

References

[1] Alexiou, C. 2009. Government spending and economic growth: Econometric evidence from the South Eastern Europe. Journal of Economic and Social Research, 11(1): 1-16. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.452.6517&rep=rep1&type=pdf
[2] Ansari, M. I., Gordon, D. V. and Akuamoach, C. 1997. Keynes versus Wagner: Public expenditure and national income for three African Countries. Applied Economics, 29: 543-550.
[3] Barro, R. J. 1990. Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 98: 103-125.
[4] Caselli, F., Esquivel, G. and Lefort, F. 1996. Reopening the convergence debate: a new look at cross-country growth empirics. Journal of Economic Growth, 1: 363-389.
[5] Churchill, S. A., Yew, S. L. and Ugur, M. 2015. Does government size affect per-capita income growth? A hierarchical meta-regression analysis. Economic Department, Discussion Paper 37/15, Monashi Business School.https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/925650/does_government_size_affect_per-capita_income_growth_a_hierarchical_meta-regression_analysis.pdf
[6] Davies, A. 2009. Human development and the optimal size of government. Journal of Socio-Economics, 38: 326-330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.07.015
[7] Enang, B. U. 2010. Macroeconomic reforms, government size and investment behaviour in Nigeria: An empirical investigation. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 12(1).
[8] Folster, S. and Henrekson, F. 2001. Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries. European Economic Review, 45(8): 1501-1520. https://www.ifn.se/Wfiles/wp/wp503.pdf
[9] Gisore, N., et al. 2014. Effect of government expenditure on economic growth in East Africa: A disaggregated model. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 3(8): 289 – 304
[10] Hung, Y. 2011. Determinants of Financial Development. Basingstoke, Hamsphire, New York.
[11] Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H. and Shin, Y. 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115: 53-74.
[12] Islam, N. 1995. Growth empirics: A panel data approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4): 1127 – 1170.
[13] Iyare, S. O., Lorde, T. and Francis, B. 2005. Does sustainability of currency union critically depend on fiscal discipline among its members: Evidence of Wagner’s law in West Africa. West African Journal of Monetary Economic Integration, 5: 81-116
[14] Kao, C. 1999. Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90: 1-44.
[15] Katrin, H. 2009. Beyond the average case: The mean focus fallacy of standard linear regression and the use of quantile regression for the social sciences. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1434418
[16] Koenker, R. and Bassett, G. 1978. Quantile regression. Econometrica, 46: 33-50.
[17] Koenker, R. 2005. Quantile Regression. Cambridge University Press. Pp116-149
[18] Komain, J. and Brahmasrene, T. 2007. The Relationship between Expenditure and Economic Growth in Thailand. Journal of Economics and Education Research, 8(2)
[19] Kuan, C. M. 2007. An Introduction to Quantile Regression. Access from avesbiodiv.mncn.csic.es
[20] Levin, A., Lin, C. and Chu, J. C. 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1): 1-24,
[21] Levine, R., Loayza, N. and Beck, T. 2000. Financial intermediation and growth: causality and causes. Journal of Monetary Economics, 46(1): 31- 77.
[22] Maddala, G. S. and Wu, S. 1999. A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and New Simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics, 61(Special Issue Nov.): 631-52. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.13
[23] Martins, S. and Veiga, F. J. 2013. Government size, composition of public expenditure, and economic development. NIPE Working Paper Series -WP 17. Avalaible at: http://www.eeg.uminho.pt/economia/nipe
[24] Mello, M. and Novo, A. 2002. The New Empirics of Economic Growth: Quantile Regression Estimation of Growth Equations. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Available at: www.econ.puc-rio.br
[25] Moreno-Dodson, B. and Bayraktar, N. 2015. Public spending and growth in an Economic and Monetary Union: The case of West Africa. MFM Discussion Paper Series, No 6.
[26] Mudaki, J. and Masaviru, W. 2012. Does the composition of public expenditure matter to economic growth for Kenya? Journal of Economics, 3(3).
[27] Oriakhi, D. E. and Arodoye, L. N. 2013. The Government Size–Economic Growth relationship: Nigerian Econometric Evidence using a Vector Autoregressive Model. International Journal of Business & Management, 8(10): 126-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n10p126
[28] Oteng-Abayie, E. F. and Frimpong, J. M. 2009. Size of government expenditure and economic growth in WAMZ countries. Bus. Rev. Cambridge, 14: 172-175
[29] Pevcin, P. 2004. Economic Output and the Optimal Size of Government. Economic and Business Review, 6(3): 213-227.
[30] Sen, A. 1973. On Economic Inequality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
[31] Stiglitz, J. 2016. Inequality and economic growth. Available at: https://www8.gsb.columbia.edu/.../jstiglitz
[32] Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A. and Fitoussi, J. P. 2009. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Paris: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/118025/118123/Fitoussi+Commission+report
[33] Thorbecke, E. 2013. Institutions for Inclusive Growth and Development in Sub-Saharan Africa. A paper presented at the JICA Conference, SOAS, University of London.
[34] Yasin, M. 2003. Public spending and economic growth: empirical investigation of Sub-Saharan Africa. Southwestern Economic Review, 30(1): 59-68.
[35] African Economic Outlook, AEO (2014). Available at: http://www.africaneconomicoutlook.org-/en/statistics/
[36] World Economic Outlook (2017). Available at: www.worldeconomicoutlook.org
Published
2020-07-13
How to Cite
ALIMI, R. Santos. PUBLIC SPENDING AND ECONOMIC WELFARE IN ECOWAS COUNTRIES: DOES LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT MATTER?. Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 1, p. 58-66, july 2020. ISSN 2068-7710. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/tpref/article/view/5247>. Date accessed: 06 aug. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//tpref.v11.1(21).05.