WAGE INEQUALITY AND INNOVATIVE INTELLIGENCE-BIASED TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE
In this paper, “innovative intelligence–biased technological change” (IIBTC) is examined as an alternative to the traditional concept of skill-biased technological change (SBTC) as a source of increases in wage inequality. The innovative intelligence of ordinary or average workers is an important element in productivity and can be heterogeneous across workers. Because technologies are heterogeneous in that they have different characteristics and are used in different situations, some technologies are “innovative intelligence-biased” and are advantageous for workers with relatively high innovative intelligence. If IIBTC prevails over a certain period of time, these workers become additionally advantaged and thereby wage inequality will increase during the period.
 David, H., Levy F. and Murnane R. J. 2003. The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4): 1279-1333. DOI: 10.1162/003355303322552801
 David, H., Katz, L. F. and Krueger, A. B. 1998. Computing Inequality: Have Computers Changed the Labor Market? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4): 1169-1213. DOI: 10.1162/003355398555874
 Goldberg, P. K. and Pavcnik, N. 2007. Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries, Journal of Economic Literature, 45(1): 39-82. DOI: 10.1257/jel.45.1.39
 Harashima, Taiji 2009. A Theory of Total Factor Productivity and the Convergence Hypothesis: Workers’ Innovations as an Essential Element, MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper No. 15508.
 Harashima, Taiji 2012. A Theory of Intelligence and Total Factor Productivity: Value Added Reflects the Fruits of Fluid Intelligence, MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper No. 43151.
 Harashima, Taiji 2016. A Theory of Total Factor Productivity and the Convergence Hypothesis: Workers’ Innovations as an Essential Element, (in Japanese), Journal of Kanazawa Seiryo University, 50(1): 55-80.
 Harashima, Taiji 2017. A Theory on the Economic Impacts of Immigration, MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper No. 78821
 Katz, L. F. and Murphy, K. M. 1992. Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(1): 35-78. DOI: 10.2307/2118323
 Leamer, E. E. 1998. In Search of Stolper-Samuelson Linkages between International Trade and Lower Wages, in Imports, Exports, and the American Worker, Susan M. Collins (ed), Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
 Lord, F. M. and Novick, M. R. 1968. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
 Stolper, W. F. and Samuelson, P. A. 1941. Protection and Real Wages, The Review of Economic Studies, 9(1): 58-73.
 van der Linden, W/.J. and Hambleton, R.K. (Eds.) 1997. Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.