WAGE INEQUALITY AND INNOVATIVE INTELLIGENCE-BIASED TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE

  • Taiji HARASHIMA Department of Economics Kanazawa Seiryo University, Japan

Abstract

In this paper, “innovative intelligence–biased technological change” (IIBTC) is examined as an alternative to the traditional concept of skill-biased technological change (SBTC) as a source of increases in wage inequality. The innovative intelligence of ordinary or average workers is an important element in productivity and can be heterogeneous across workers. Because technologies are heterogeneous in that they have different characteristics and are used in different situations, some technologies are “innovative intelligence-biased” and are advantageous for workers with relatively high innovative intelligence. If IIBTC prevails over a certain period of time, these workers become additionally advantaged and thereby wage inequality will increase during the period.

References

[1] Card, D. and DiNardo J. E. 2002. Skill-Biased Technological Change and Rising Wage Inequality: Some Problems and Puzzles, Journal of Labor Economics, 20(4): 733- 783.
[2] David, H., Levy F. and Murnane R. J. 2003. The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4): 1279-1333. DOI: 10.1162/003355303322552801
[3] David, H., Katz, L. F. and Krueger, A. B. 1998. Computing Inequality: Have Computers Changed the Labor Market? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4): 1169-1213. DOI: 10.1162/003355398555874
[4] Goldberg, P. K. and Pavcnik, N. 2007. Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries, Journal of Economic Literature, 45(1): 39-82. DOI: 10.1257/jel.45.1.39
[5] Harashima, Taiji 2009. A Theory of Total Factor Productivity and the Convergence Hypothesis: Workers’ Innovations as an Essential Element, MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper No. 15508.
[6] Harashima, Taiji 2012. A Theory of Intelligence and Total Factor Productivity: Value Added Reflects the Fruits of Fluid Intelligence, MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper No. 43151.
[7] Harashima, Taiji 2016. A Theory of Total Factor Productivity and the Convergence Hypothesis: Workers’ Innovations as an Essential Element, (in Japanese), Journal of Kanazawa Seiryo University, 50(1): 55-80.
[8] Harashima, Taiji 2017. A Theory on the Economic Impacts of Immigration, MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper No. 78821
[9] Katz, L. F. and Murphy, K. M. 1992. Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(1): 35-78. DOI: 10.2307/2118323
[10] Leamer, E. E. 1998. In Search of Stolper-Samuelson Linkages between International Trade and Lower Wages, in Imports, Exports, and the American Worker, Susan M. Collins (ed), Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
[11] Lord, F. M. and Novick, M. R. 1968. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
[12] Stolper, W. F. and Samuelson, P. A. 1941. Protection and Real Wages, The Review of Economic Studies, 9(1): 58-73.
[13] van der Linden, W/.J. and Hambleton, R.K. (Eds.) 1997. Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Published
2018-06-30
How to Cite
HARASHIMA, Taiji. WAGE INEQUALITY AND INNOVATIVE INTELLIGENCE-BIASED TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE. Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 17-24, june 2018. ISSN 2068-7710. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/tpref/article/view/2220>. Date accessed: 23 nov. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/tpref.v9.1(17).02.