• Ivan D. TROFIMOV Kolej Yayasan Saad (KYS) Business School, Malaysia


The paper provides comprehensive review of alternative explanations of the trade policy formation, associated rise of trade protectionism, and difficulties of trade liberalization. Normative economic, systemic, public interest, political, institutional and constitutional economic theories of trade policy, together with political science models of trade cooperation are considered. The paper shows that current research in the area tends to accentuate the factors that entrench trade protectionism, while paying insufficient attention to the role of agency, policy dynamics and informal institutions that may bring in trade liberalization. Requirements for holistic and dynamic analysis of trade policy are outlined.


[1] Allison, G. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. New York: Longman.
[2] Anderson, J. E., and Zanardi, M. 2004. Political Pressure Deflection. NBER Working Paper No. W10439.
[3] Bauer, R., Sola Pool De, I., and Dexter, L. A. 2007. American Business and Public Policy: The Politics of Foreign Trade. New York: Transaction Publishing.
[4] Baumgartner, F., and Jones, B. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[5] Benjamin, R., and Yager, L. 1993. Fairness: The Scylla and Charybdis of US-Japan Relations, RAND Center for Asia-Pacific Policy, Santa Monica.
[6] Bennedsen, M., and Feldmann, S. 2002. Lobbying Legislature. Journal of Political Economy, 110 (4): 919-946. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/340775
[7] Bergsten, C. F. 1996. Globalizing Free Trade. Foreign Affairs, May-June: 105-106.
[8] Besley, T., and Coate, S. 2001. Lobbying and Welfare in a Representative Democracy. Review of Economic Studies, 68 (1): 67-82. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00160
[9] Bhagwati, J. 1987. International Trade: Selected Readings. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[10] Borcherding, T. E. 2002. The Contributions of James M. Buchanan to Public Finance and Political Economy. Public Finance Review, 30 (6): 646-666.
[11] Botterill, L. C. 2004. Valuing Agriculture: Balancing Competing Objectives in the Policy Process. Journal of Public Policy, 24 (2): 199-218.
[12] Brennan G., and Buchanan J. M. 1984. Voter Choice: Evaluating Political Alternatives. American Behavioural Scientist, 28 (2): 185-201.
[13] Bromley, D. W. 2006. Sufficient Reason: Volitional Pragmatism and the Meaning of Economic Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[14] Browne, W. P. 1995. Cultivating Congress: Constituents, Issues, and Interests in Agricultural Policymaking. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
[15] Buchanan, J. M. 1986. The Relevance of the Constitutional Strategy. Cato Journal, 6 (2): 513-517.
[16] Buchanan, J. M. 1987. The Constitution of Economic Policy. American Economic Review, 77 (3): 243-250. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.236.4807.1433
[17] Buchanan, J. M., and Vanberg, V. 1977. Interests and Theories in Constitutional Choice. In Buchanan, J. M. (ed). Choice, Contracts and Constitutions, Collected Work. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
[18] Bullock, D. S. 1994. In Search of Rational Government: What Political Preference Function Studies Measure and Assume. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76 (3): 347-361. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1243648
[19] Caves, R. E. 1976. Economic Models of Political Choice: Canada’s Tariff Structure. Canadian Journal of Economics, 9 (2): 279-300. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/134522
[20] Chase, K. A. 2003. Economic Interests and Regional Trading Agreements: The Case of NAFTA. International Organization, 57 (1): 137-174.
[21] Chase-Dunn, C. 1995. The Historical Evolution of the International Political Economy. Aldershot: Edwin Elgar.
[22] Cohen, B. J. 1990. The Political Economy of International Trade. International Organization, 44 (2): 261-281. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002081830003527X
[23] Daugjberg, C. 1999. Reforming the CAP: Policy Networks and Broader Institutional Structures. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37 (3): 407-428.
[24] Davis, C. L. 2005. Food Fights over Free Trade: How International Institutions Promote Agricultural Trade Liberalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[25] Dawson, L. 2005. Making Canadian Trade Policy: Domestic Decision Making and the Negotiation of the Auto Pact and the CUFTA. Carleton University, Unpublished Dissertation.
[26] Destler, I. M. 1996. American Trade Politics: System under Stress. New York: Institute for International Economics.
[27] Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
[28] Downs, G., and Rocke, D. 1995. Optimal Imperfection? Domestic Uncertainty and Institutions in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[29] Dutt, P., and Mitra, D. 2002. Endogenous Trade Policy through Majority Voting: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of International Economics, 58 (1): 107-133.
[30] Evenett, S. J. 2007. The Trade Policy Jungle: A Survival Guide for Academic Economists. University of St. Gallen, Department of Economics Discussion Paper No.16.
[31] Fearon, J. D. 1998. Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation. International Organisation, 52 (2): 269-306. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/002081898753162820
[32] Feld, L. P., and Schnellenbach, J. 2007. Political Institutions and Policy Innovations: Theoretical Thoughts and Evidence on Labour Market Regulations. In Marciano A., Rosselin J.-M. (eds.) Democracy, Freedom and Coercion: A Law and Economics Approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 192-220.
[33] Fieleke, N. 1976. The Tariff Structure for Manufacturing Industries in the United States: A Test of Some Traditional Explanations. Columbia Journal of World Business, 11 (4): 98-104.
[34] Finger, J. M., Hall, H. K., and Nelson, D. R. 1982. The Political Economy of Administered Protection. American Economic Review, 72 (3): 452-466.
[35] Gallarotti, G. 1985. Toward a Business Cycle Model of Tariffs. International Organization, 39 (1): 155-187. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300004896
[36] Gawande, K. 1998. Stigler-Olson Lobbying Behavior in Protectionist Industries: Evidence from the Lobbying Power Function. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 35 (4): 477-499.
[37] Gilligan, M. 1997. Empowering Exporters: Reciprocity, Delegation, and Collective Action in American Trade Policy. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
[38] Glassman, J. K. 1998. The Blessings of Free Trade. Trade Briefing Paper No. 1. Cato Institute.
[39] Goldberg, P., and Magee, G. 1999. Protection for Sale: An Empirical Investigation. American Economic Review, 89 (5): 1135-1155. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.5.1135
[40] Goldstein, J., and Lenway, S. 1989. The International Trade Commission: Congressional Agent or Autonomous Agency. International Studies Quarterly, 33 (3): 303-327.
[41] Gourevitch, P. 1986. Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaka: Cornell University Press.
[42] Grossman, G. M., and Helpman, E. 2001. Special Interest Politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[43] Grossman, G. M., and Helpman, E. 1995. Trade Wars and Trade Talks. Journal of Political Economy, 103 (4): 675-708. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261999
[44] Guerrieri, P., and Padoan, P. C. 1988. The Political Economy of International Cooperation. London: Croom Helm.
[45] Gwartney, J., and Wagner, R. E. 1988. Public Choice and Constitutional Economics. Greenwich: JAI Press.
[46] Haas, E. B. 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Economic and Social Forces, 1950-57. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
[47] Hall, P. 1993. Ideas and Social Sciences. In Goldstein, J., Keohane, R. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
[48] Hall, P. 1993. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policy-Making in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25 (3): 275-296.
[49] Hampson, F. O., and Hart, M. 1995. Multilateral Negotiations: Lessons from Arms Control, Trade, and the Environment. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
[50] Harris, R. A., and Milkis, S. 1996. The Politics of Regulatory Change: A Tale of Two Agencies. New York: Oxford University Press.
[51] Helleiner, G. K. 1977. The Political Economy of Canada’s Tariff Structure: An Alternative Model. Canadian Journal of Economics, 10 (2): 318-326.
[52] Herrmann-Pillath, C. 2006. Reciprocity and the Hidden Constitution of World Trade. Constitutional Political Economy, 17 (3): 133-163.
[53] Hiscox, M. J. 2002. International Trade and Political Conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[54] Johnson, D. B. 1992. Public Choice, an Introduction to the New Political Economy. California: Bristlecon Books Mayfield Publishing Company.
[55] Johnson, M., Mahe, L., and Roe, T. 1993. Trade Compromises between the EC and the US: An Interest Group-Game Theoretic Approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 15 (2): 199-222.
[56] Jones, R. W., and Kenen, P. B. 1984. Handbook of International Economics, Volume I – International Trade. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
[57] Josling, T., Tangermann, S., and Warley, T. 1996. Agriculture in the GATT. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
[58] Katzenstein, P. J. 1978. Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
[59] Kemp, M. C. 1962. The Gain from International Trade. The Economic Journal, 72 (288): 803-819. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2228352
[60] Keohane, R. O. 1998. International Institutions: Can Interdependence Work? Foreign Policy, 110: 82-96. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1149278
[61] Kindleberger, C. P. 1975. The Rise of Free Trade in Western Europe. Journal of Economic History, 35 (1): 20-55.
[62] Kindleberger, C. P. 1986. International Public Goods without International Government. The American Economic Review, 76 (1): 1-13.
[63] Kingdon, J. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
[64] Koester, U. 1991. The EC and the World Markets. Paper Presented at the Conference on Mechanisms to Improve Agricultural Trade Performance under the GATT, Kiel, Germany.
[65] Kovenock, D., and Thursby, M. 1992. GATT, Dispute Settlement and Cooperation. Economics and Politics, 4 (2): 151-170. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.1992.tb00060.x
[66] Krueger, A. O. 1974. The Political Economy of a Rent-Seeking Society. American Economic Review, 64 (3): 291-303.
[67] Krueger, A. O. 1990. Asymmetries in Policy between Exportable and Import-Competing Goods. In Jones R. W., and Krueger A. O. The Political Economy of International Trade. Massachusetts: Basil Blackwell Inc.
[68] Krueger, A. O. 1995. American Trade Policy: A Tragedy in the Making. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.
[69] Lake, D. A. 1993. Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch With Potential? International Studies Quarterly, 37 (4): 459-489. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2600841
[70] Lake, D. A., and Powell, R. 1999. Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[71] Lemieux, P. 1989. GATT and the Alternative of Unilateral Free Trade. Freeman: The Ideas on Liberty.
[72] Libby, R. 1992. Protecting Markets: US Policy and the World Grain Trade. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
[73] Lieberman, R. 2002. Ideas, Institutions, and Political Order: Explaining Political Change. American Political Science Review, 96 (4): 697-712.
[74] Lindblom, C. E. 1959. The Science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review, 19 (2): 79-88. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/973677
[75] Lohmann, S., and O’Halloran, S. 1994. Divided Government and US Trade Policy: Theory and Evidence. International Organization, 48 (4): 595-632.
[76] Magee, S., Brock, W., and Young, L. 1989. Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[77] Matsuyama, K. 1990. Perfect Equilibria in a Trade Liberalisation Game. American Economic Review, 80 (3): 480-492.
[78] May, P. 1992. Policy Learning and Failure. Journal of Public Policy, 12 (4): 331-354.
[79] Mayer, F. W. 1991. Domestic Politics and the Strategy of International Trade. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10 (2): 222-246.
[80] Mayer, F. W. 1998. Interpreting NAFTA: The Science and Art of Political Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
[81] Mazey, S., and Richardson, J. J. (eds). 1993. Lobbying in the European Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[82] McKeown, T. J. 1986. The Limitations of “Structural” Theories of Commercial Policy. International Organization, 40 (1): 43-64.
[83] McKibbin, W. J. 1988. The Economics of International Policy Coordination. Economic Record, 64 (187): 241-253. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1988.tb02063.x
[84] Messerlin, P. A. 1983. Bureaucracies and the Political Economy of Protection, Reflections of a Continental European. Staff Working Paper 568. Washington: The World Bank.
[85] Meunier, S. 2005. Trading Voices: The European Union in International Commercial Negotiations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[86] Meunier, S., and Nicolaidis, K. 1997. National Sovereignty vs. International Efficiency: The Delegation of Trade Authority in the European Union. Paper Presented at the Seminar on European Integration, Harvard University.
[87] Milner, H. 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[88] Moravcsik, A. 1991. Negotiating the Single European Act. In Keohane, R., Hoffmann, S. The New European Community. Westview: Boulder.
[89] Morrow, J. 1994. The Forms of International Cooperation. International Organisation, 48 (3): 387-423.
[90] Moser, P. 1989. Toward an Open World Order: A Constitutional Economics Approach. Cato Journal, 9 (1):133-147.
[91] Mulgan, A. G. 1997. The Role of Foreign Pressure (Gaiatsu) in Japan’s Agricultural Trade Liberalisation. The Pacific Review, 10 (2):165-209.
[92] Murphy, A. 1990. The European Community and the International Trading System. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
[93] Niskanen, W. 1986. Economists and Politicians. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 5 (2): 234-244. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3323543
[94] Nye, J. 1990. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books.
[95] O’Halloran, S. 1994. Politics, Process, and American Trade Policy. Ann Harbor: University of Michigan Press.
[96] Odell, J. 1993. International Threats and Internal Politics. In Evans, P., Jacobson, H., Putnam, R. Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[97] Odell, J. 2002. Creating Data on International Negotiation Strategies, Alternatives and Outcomes. International Negotiation, 7 (1): 39-52.
[98] Olper, A. 2001. Determinants of Agricultural Protection: The Role of Democracy and Institutional Setting. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52 (2): 75-92.
[99] Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[100] Paarlberg, P. L., and Abbott, P. C. 1986. Oligopolistic Behaviour by Public Agencies in International Trade: The World Wheat Market. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68 (3): 528-542.
[101] Parisi, F. 1988. The Constitutional and Political Economy of Trade Protection. European Journal of Law and Economics, 5: 67-79.
[102] Persson, T., and Tabellini, G. 1999. The Size and Scope of Government: Comparative Politics with Rational Politicians. European Economic Review, 43 (4-6): 699-735. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00131-7
[103] Peters, B. G. 1999. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. London: Pinter.
[104] Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., and King, D. S. 2005. The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism. The Journal of Politics, 67 (4): 1275-1300.
[105] Petersmann, E.-U. 1988. Grey Area Trade Policy and Rule of Law. Journal of World Trade, 22 (2): 23-44.
[106] Petit, M. 1985. Determinants of Agricultural Policies in the United States and the European Community. Research Report No. 51. Washington: International Food Policy Research Institute.
[107] Pollack, M. A. 1997. Delegation, Agency and Agenda Setting in the European Community. International Organization, 51 (1): 99-134.
[108] Putnam, R. D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization, 42 (3): 427-460.
[109] Rausser, G. C., and Foster, W. E. 1990. Political Preference Functions and Public Policy Reform. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72 (3): 641-652.
[110] Reinhardt, E. 2001. Adjudication without Enforcement in GATT Disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45 (2): 174-195.
[111] Rhodes, C., and Mazey, S. 1995. The State of the European Union, Volume 3: Building a European Policy? Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[112] Rodrik, D. 1992. The Limits to Trade Policy Reform in LDCs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6 (1): 87-105.
[113] Rodrik, D. 1996. Understanding Economic Policy Reform. Journal of Economic Literature, 34 (1): 9-41.
[114] Rogowski, R. 1989. Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[115] Rowley, C. K., Thorbecke, W., and Wagner, E. R. 1995. Trade Protection in the United States. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
[116] Ruppel, F. J., Boadu, F. O., and Peterson, W. F. 1991. Federalism, Opportunism, and Multilateral Trade Negotiations in Agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73 (4): 1009-1019. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1242428
[117] Sabatier, P., and Jenkins-Smith, H. 2007. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
[118] Schattschneider, E.E. 1935. Politics, Pressures and the Tariff. New York: Prentice-Hall.
[119] Schoppa, L. J. 1993. Two-Level Games and Bargaining Outcomes: Why Gaiatsu Succeeds in Japan in Some Cases but Not in Others. International Organization, 47 (3): 353-386. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027995
[120] Sebenius, J. 1992. Challenging Conventional Explanations of International Cooperation: Negotiation Analysis and the Case of Epistemic Communities. International Organization, 46 (1): 323-365. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001521
[121] Sheingate, A. D. 2001. The Rise of the Agricultural Welfare State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[122] Shockley, G. 2007. Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Change: A Critique of Punctuated Equilibrium Theory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
[123] Slembeck, T. 1997. The Formation of Economic Policy: A Cognitive-Evolutionary Approach to Policy-Making. Constitutional Political Economy, 8 (3): 225-254.
[124] Stein, A. 1990. Why Nations Cooperate: Circumstances and Choice in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
[125] Stern, R. M. (ed.) 1987. US Trade Policies in a Changing World Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[126] Sugden, R. 1984. Reciprocity: The Supply of Public Goods through Voluntary Contributions. Economic Journal, 94 (376): 772-787. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2232294
[127] Thies, C. G., and Porche, S. 2007. The Political Economy of Agricultural Protection. Journal of Politics, 69 (1): 116-127.
[128] Tinbergen, J. 1952. On the Theory of Economic Policy. Amsterdam: North Holland.
[129] Tsebelis, G., and Yataganas, X. 2002. Veto Players and Decision-Making in the EU after Nice. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40 (2): 283-307.
[130] Tumlir, J. 1983. International Economic Order and Democratic Constitutionalism. ORDO, 34: 71-83.
[131] Tyers, R. 1990. Implicit Policy Preferences and the Assessment of Negotiable Trade Policy Reforms. European Economic Review, 34 (7): 1399-1426
[132] Vernon, R., Spar, D., and Tobin G. 1991. Iron Triangles and Revolving Doors: Cases in US Foreign Economic Policymaking. New York: Praeger.
[133] Wallerstein, M. 1987. Unemployment, Collective Bargaining and the Demand for Protection. American Journal of Political Science, 31 (4): 729-752.
[134] Walton, R., Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J., and McKersie, R. 1994. Strategic Negotiations: A Theory of Change in Labor-Management Relations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
[135] Webb, M. C. 1995. The Political Economy of Policy Coordination: International Adjustments since 1945. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
[136] Weber, K. 2000. Hierarchy amidst Anarchy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
[137] Wegner, G. 2004. Political Learning: The Neglected Precondition of Constitutional Reform. Constitutional Political Economy, 15 (4): 339-358.
[138] Wendt, A. 1994. Collective Identity Formation and the International State. American Political Science Review, 88 (2): 384-396. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2944711
[139] Wiener, J. 1995. Making Rules in the Uruguay Round of the GATT: A Study of International Leadership. Brookfield: Dartmouth University Press.
[140] Williamson, O. 1990. Transaction Cost Economics. In Schmalensee, R., Willig, R. Handbook of Industrial Organization. New York: Free Press.
[141] Wilson, C. 2000. Policy Regimes and Policy Change. Journal of Public Policy, 20 (3): 247-274.
[142] Winham, G. 1979. Practitioners’ Views of International Negotiations. World Politics, 32 (1): 111-135. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2010084
[143] Winters, L. A. 1987. The Political Economy of the Agricultural Policy of Industrial Countries. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 14 (3): 285-304.
[144] Winters, L. A. 1990. Digging for Victory: Agricultural Policy and National Security. World Economy, 13 (2): 170-190. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.1990.tb00484.x
[145] Yarbrough, B. V., and Yarbrough, R. M. 1986. Reciprocity, Bilateralism, and Economic “Hostages”. International Studies Quarterly, 30 (1): 7-21.
[146] Yarbrough, B. V., and Yarbrough, R. M. 1990. International Institutions and the New Economics of Organization. International Organization, 44 (2): 235-259.
How to Cite
TROFIMOV, Ivan D.. POLITICAL ECONOMY OF TRADE PROTECTION AND LIBERALISATION: IN SEARCH OF AGENCY-BASED AND HOLISTIC FRAMEWORK OF POLICY CHANGE. Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 2, p. 121-136, dec. 2017. ISSN 2068-7710. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/tpref/article/view/1560>. Date accessed: 01 oct. 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/tpref.v8.2(16).04.