Is There Excess Capacity Really?
Abstract
Excess capacity is viewed as a distinctive feature and an essential inefficiency of monopolistic competition as the large-group case of imperfect competition. Using a simple geometrical approach and studying the demand and cost curves faced by the individual firm, we find that there is little potential for excess capacity in monopolistically competitive markets, opposite to the common perception and wide coverage in the literature. We see monopolistic competition as the true type of competition in the presence of transaction costs where perfect competition is a hypothetical and ideal benchmark which cannot exist under positive transaction costs.
References
[2] Baumol, W.J. (1964). Monopolistic Competition and Welfare Economics. The American Economic Review, 54(3), Papers and Proceedings of the Seventy-sixth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association: 44-52, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1818488.
[3] Chamberlin, E.H. (1952). ‘Full Cost’ and Monopolistic Competition. The Economic Journal, 62(246):318-325, http://doi.org/10.2307/2227007.
[4] Chamberlin, E.H. (1947).The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 5thed.
[5] Church, J.R., Ware, R. (2000).Industrial Organization: A Strategic Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[6] Clark, J.M. (1939). Monopolistic Tendencies, Their Character and Consequences. Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, 18(2), Monopoly and Competition in Industry and Labor (Jan. 1939): 2-10,http://doi.org/10.2307/1172364.
[7] Coase, R.H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, New Series, 4(16): 386-405,http://doi.org/10.2307/2626876.
[8] Demsetz, H. (1982).Barriers to Entry. The American Economic Review, 72: 47-57,http://www.jstor.org/stable/1808574.
[9] Demsetz, H. (1972). The Inconsistencies of Monopolistic Competition: a Reply. Journal of Political Economy, 80(3), Part 1 (May-June): 592-597,http://www.jstor.org/stable/1830570.
[10] Demsetz, H. (1959). The Nature of Equilibrium in Monopolistic Competition. Journal of Political Economy, 67(1): 21-30, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1826696.
[11] Dixit, A.K, Stiglitz, J.E. (1977). Monopolistic Competition and Optimal Product Diversity. The American Economic Review, 67(3): 297-308, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1831401.
[12] Harrod, R.F. (1952). Theory of Imperfect Competition Revised, in Economic Essays, ISBN: 978-1-349-01496-5.
[13] Kerr, P., Harcourt, G. C. (2002). Joan Robinson: Critical Assessments of Leading Economists. 1, London: Routledge, ISBN: 0-415-21743-1.
[14] Klein, L.R. (1960).Some Theoretical Issues in the Measurement of Capacity. Econometrica, 28(2): 272-286, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1907721.
[15] Machlup, P. (1939). Evaluation of the Practical Significance of the Theory of Monopolistic Competition. The American Economic Review, 29(2): 227-236,http://www.jstor.org/stable/1803621.
[16] Nichol, A.J. (1934). The Influence of Marginal Buyers on Monopolistic Competition.The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 49(1): 121-137.
[17] Nicols, A. (1947). The Rehabilitation of Pure Competition. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 62(1): 31-63, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1885783.
[18] Nutter, G.W. (1955). The Plateau Demand Curve and Utility Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 63(6): 525-528, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1825371.
[19] Paul, M.E. (1954). Notes on Excess Capacity. Oxford Economics Papers, New Series, 6(1): 33-40, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2661980.
[20] Robinson, J.V. (1933). The Economics of Imperfect Competition. London: Macmillan, 2nd edition, reprinted 1969, ISBN: 0333102894.
[21] Schumpeter, J.A. (1939). Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1.
[22] Stigler, G.J. (1968). The Theory of Price. New York: Macmillan, 3rd edition, ISBN: 978-0024174000.
[23] Sutton, J. (1991). Sunk Costs and Market Structure: Price Competition, Advertising, and the Evolution of Concentration. Cambridge: MIT Press, ISBN: 0262693585.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.