SUSTAINABLE HETEROGENEITY IN EXOGENOUS GROWTH MODELS. THE SOCIALLY OPTIMAL DISTRIBUTION BY GOVERNMENT’S INTERVENTION
This paper examines the socially optimal allocation by focusing not on the social welfare function but instead on the utility possibility frontier in exogenous growth models with a heterogeneous population. A unique balanced growth path was found on which all of the optimality conditions of all heterogeneous households are equally and indefinitely satisfied (sustainable heterogeneity). With appropriate government interventions, such a path is always achievable and is uniquely socially optimal for almost all generally usable (i.e., preferences are complete, transitive, and continuous) social welfare functions. The only exceptions are some variants in Nietzsche type social welfare functions, but those types of welfare functions will rarely be adopted in democratic societies. This result indicates that it is no longer necessary to specify the shape of the social welfare function to determine the socially optimal growth path in a heterogeneous population.
 Arrow, Kenneth J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values, Wiley, New York.
 Arrow, Kenneth J. (1962). The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing, Review of Economic Studies, 29: 155–173.
 Arrow, Kenneth J., Bert Bolin, Robert Costanza, Partha Dasgupta, Carl Folke, C. S. Holling, Bengt-Owe Jansson, Simon Levin, Karl-Goran Maler, Charles Perrings, and David Pimentel (1995). Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity, and the Environment, Science, 268(28): 520–521.
 Barro, Robert J. and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. (1995). Economic Growth, McGraw-Hill, New York.
 Becker, Robert A. (1980). On the long-run steady state in a simple dynamic model of equilibrium with heterogeneous households, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95(2): 375–382.
 Bergson, A. (1938). A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52(2): 310-334.
 Black, D. (1958). The Theory of Committees and Elections, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
 Coase, Ronald H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm, Economica, 4: 386–405.
 Dinopoulos, E., Thompson, P. (1998). Schumpeterian Growth without Scale Effects, Journal of Economic Growth, 3: 313–335.
 Farmer, Roger E. A. and Amartya, Lahiri. (2005). Recursive Preferences and Balanced Growth, Journal of Economic Theory, 125(1): 61–77.
 Ghiglino, C. (2002). Introduction to a general equilibrium approach to economic growth, Journal of Economic Theory, 105(1): 1–17.
 Gray, John N. (1998). False Dawn: The Delusions of Global Capitalism, Granta Publications, London.
 Grossman, Sanford J. and Hart, Oliver D. (1986). The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration, Journal of Political Economy, 94: 691–719.
 Hamilton, W.D. (1964a). The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior I, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1): 1–16.
 Hamilton, W.D. (1964b). The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior II, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1): 17–52.
 Harashima, Taiji. (2009). Trade Liberalization and Heterogeneous Rates of Time Preference across Countries: A Possibility of Trade Deficits with China, MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper, 19386.
 Harashima, Taiji. (2010). Sustainable Heterogeneity: Inequality, Growth, and Social Welfare in a Heterogeneous Population, MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper, 24233.
 Harashima, Taiji. (2012). Sustainable Heterogeneity as the Unique Socially Optimal Allocation for Almost All Social Welfare Functions, MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper, 40938.
 Jacobs, J. (1969). The Economy of Cities, Random House, New York.
 Jones, C.I. (1995). Time series test of endogenous growth models, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2): 495–525.
 Jones, C.I. (1999). Growth: With or Without Scale Effects?, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 89(2): 139–144.
 Kaldor, N. (1961). Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth, Chap. 10 of A. Lutz and D. C. Hague (eds.), The Theory of Capital, St. Martin’s Press, New York.
 Klein, N. (2000). No Logo, Flamingo, London.
 Lawrance, E.C. (1991). Poverty and the Rate of Time Preference: Evidence from Panel Data, Journal of Political Economy, 99(1): 54–77.
 Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics, Macmillan, London.
 Moore, J. (1992). The Firm as a Collection of Assets, European Economic Review, 36: 493–507.
 Peretto, P. (1998). Technological change and population growth, Journal of Economic Growth, 3: 283–311.
 Romer, P.M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth, Journal of Political Economy, 94(5) 1002–1037.
 Samuelson, P.A. (1947). Foundations of Economic Analysis, Harvard University Press (Enlarged ed. 1983), Cambridge, MA.
 Samwick, A.A. (1998). Discount Rate Heterogeneity and Social Security Reform, Journal of Development Economics, 57(1): 117–146.
 Sen, Amartya Kumar. (1976). Real National Income, Review of Economic Studies, 43(1): 19–39.
 Soros, G. (2008). The New Paradigm for Financial Markets: The Credit Crisis of 2008 and What It Means, Public Affairs, New York.
 Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents, W.W. Norton & Company, New York.
 Stiglitz, J. (2009). Moving beyond market fundamentalism to a more balanced economy, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80(3): 345–360.
 Ventura, L. (2003). Direct Measure of Time-preference, Economic and Social Review, 34(3): 293–310.
 Williams, G.C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
 Williamson, O.E. (1967). Hierarchical Control and Optimum Firm Size, Journal of Political Economy, 75: 123–138.
 Young, Alwyn. (1998). Growth without Scale Effects, Journal of Political Economy, 106: 41–63.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.