OVERSUPPLY OF LABOR AND OTHER PECULIARITIES OF ARTS LABOR MARKET
There are several striking peculiarities of the arts labor market that have attracted the attentions of researchers in the last several decades: first is constant long run excess supply of arts labor; second, artists are more likely to be multiple-job-holders than other professions; third, artists pay significant earning penalties; finally, there are huge variations in artists earnings and huge inequalities among artists themselves. In order to explain these peculiarities, in this paper we developed two dynamic models of an artist’s behavior and arts labor supply.
In the first model proposed here an artist is depicted as someone who is hired on the arts labor market and paid for his artistic time. In the second model an artist is described as someone who sells his products, like paintings for instance, on the market for artistic products. In order to make these models dynamic, an artist’s productivity is here supposed to be a function of accumulated human capital of the artist. As a consequence, the supply of labor in the arts market appears as the result of an inter-temporal process of resources allocation. Both models end with the same result: the cost of producing a unit of an artistic commodity in a particular year should be equal to the present value of expected streams of all monetary and nonmonetary benefits generated by production of a given artistic unit. This result appears to be pretty suitable for formalization of several existing hypotheses aimed at explaining arts labor market peculiarities. Especially, by referring to the stream of expected nonmonetary benefits, models developed here are able to formalize the most promising among these hypotheses according to which an artist’s need for self-discovery and self-actualization is the driving force in explaining the oversupply of arts labor.
 Adler, M. (1985). Stardom and talent. American Economic Review, 75(1): 208–12.
 Adler, M. (2006). Stardom and Talent, Volume 1 of Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, Chapter 25 Elsevier: 895–906.
 Alper, N. and Wassall, G. H. (2006). Artists’ careers and their labor markets. Volume 1 of Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, Chapter 23 Elsevier: 813–864.
 Angner, E. and Loewenstein G. F. (2012). Behavioral economics. In Handbook of the Philosophy of Science: Philosophy of Economic Elsevier: 641–690.
 Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. NBER 75(299): 493–517.
 Becker, G. S. (1991). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
 Becker, G. S. (1993). The economic way of looking at life. John M. Olin Law and Economic Working Paper No. 12 (2nd Series).
 Becker, G. S., M. Grossman, and Murphy K. M. (1991). Rational addiction and the effect of price on consumption. American Economic Review, 81(2): 237–41.
 Bryant, W. D. and D. Throsby (2006). Creativity and the Behavior of Artists, Volume 1 of Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, Chapter 16 Elsevier: 507–529.
 Casacuberta, C. and Gandelman, N. (2012). Multiple job holding: the artist’s labor supply approach. Applied Economics, Taylor and Francis Journals 44(3): 323–337.
 Caserta, M. and Cuccia, T. (2001, August). The supply of arts labor: Towards a dynamic approach. Journal of Cultural Economics, 25(3): 185–201.
 Galor, O. and Weil, D. N. (1993). The gender gap, fertility, and growth. NBER Working Papers 4550.
 Ghez, G. and Becker, G. S. (1975). A theory of the allocation of time and goods over the life cycle. In The Allocation of Time and Goods over the Life Cycle, NBER: 1–45.
 Grossman, M. (1971). The economics of joint production in the household. Report 7145, Center Math. Stud. Bus. Econ., University of Chicago, mimeo.
 Heilbrun, J. and Gray, C. (2004). The Economics of Art and Culture (2nd Edition). Cambridge University Press.
 Jeffri J., Greenblatt, R. F. and Mary, G. (1991). The artists training and career project: Painters. Research Center for Arts and Culture, Columbia University, New York.
 Jozefowicz, J.J., Kelley, J., and Brewer, S. M. (2008). New release: An empirical analysis of vhs/dvd rental success. Atlantic Economic Journal, 36(2): 139–151.
 Krusell, P., Ohanian, L. E., Ríos-Rull, J-V, and Violante, G. L. (2000). Capital-skill complementarity and inequality: A macroeconomic analysis. Econometrica 68(5): 1029–1054.
 Mckenzie, J. (2010). How do theatrical box office revenues affect dvd retail sales? Australian empirical evidence. Journal of Cultural Economics, 34(3): 159–179.
 Menger, P.M. (2002). Are there to many artists? The ‘excess supply’ issue: a measurement puzzle, an increasingly flexibility driven functional requirement and an unavoidable mismatch effect in creative activities. International Symposium on Culture Statistics, Montreal.
 Menger, P.M. (2006). Artistic Labor Markets: Contingent Work, Excess Supply, and Occupational Risk Management: 766–811. Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
 Merijn, R. and Madden, C. (2000). Living art: Artists between making art and making the living. Australian Bulletin of Labor, 26(4): 325–354.
 Michael, R.T. and Becker, G.S. (1973). On the New Theory of Consumer Behavior. The Swedish Journal of Economics, 75: 378–396.
 Nelson, R., Reid, C. and Gilmore, O. (2007). An analysis of the out-of-market gap for dvds in the U.S. Review of Industrial Organization, 30(4): 303–323.
 Pitt, I. (2010). Superstar effects on royalty income in a performing rights organization. Journal of Cultural Economics., 34(3): 219–236.
 Rosen, S. (1981, December). The economics of superstars. American Economic Review, 71(5): 845–58.
 Rosen, S. (1987). The theory of equalizing differences. In Ashenfelter, O. and Layard, R. (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume 1, Chapter 12 Elsevier: 641–692.
 Santos, F.P. (1976). Risk, uncertainty, and the performing artist. The Economics of the Arts, London: Martin Robertson und Company: 243–259.
 Stigler, G.J. and Becker, G.S. (1977). De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review, 67(2): 76–90.
 Throsby, D. (1992). Artists as workers. In Towse, R. and Khakee, A. (Eds.), Cultural Economics, pp. 201–208. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
 Throsby, D. (1994a). The production and consumption of the arts: A view of cultural economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 32(1): 1–29.
 Throsby, D. (1994b). A work-preference model of artist behavior. In Peacock, A. and Rizzo, I. (Eds.), Cultural Economics and Cultural Policies, Springer: 69–80. The Netherlands.
 Throsby, D. (2007). Preferred work patterns of creative artists. Journal of Economics and Finance, 31(3): 395–402.
 Towse, R. (2006). Human capital and artists’ labor markets. Volume 1 of Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, Chapter 24 Elsevier: 865–894.
 Walls, W.D. (2009a). Screen wars, star wars, and sequels. Empirical Economics, 37(2): 447–461.
 Walls, W.D. (2009b). Superstars and heavy tails in pre-recorded entertainment: Empirical analysis of the market for dvds. Working Papers 2009-20, Department of Economics, University of Calgary.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.