BOUNDED RATIONALITY: PSYCHOLOGY, ECONOMICS AND THE FINANCIAL CRISES
This contribution focuses on the concept of bounded rationality, highlighting the role of psychology in the economic decisions. The work analyzes Simon’s approach and his notion of bounded rationality as procedural rationality. Moreover, it examines some major contributions of behavioral economics concerning cognitive biases, stressing the importance of the institutional structure in the decision process. The paper also surveys the literature of behavioral finance which has become fashionable in explaining the anomalies of financial markets, pointing out also its limits.
 Arrow, K.J. (1971). Essay in the theory of risk-bearing, Amsterdam, North Holland Pub.Co.
 Barberis, N., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1998). A Model of investor sentiment, Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3): 307-343.
 Barberis, N. and Thaler, R H. (2002). A survey of behavioral finance, NBER working paper 9222.
 Barberis, N. and Huang, M. (2006). The loss aversion/narrow framing approach to the equity premium puzzle. NBER working paper No 12378.
 Barros, G. (2010). Herbert A. Simon and the concept of rationality: boundaries and procedures, Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 30(3): 445-472.
 Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R.H. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1): 73-92.
 Camerer, C. and Loewenstein, G. (2003. Behavioral economics: past, present, and future. In Camerer, Colin, George Loewenstein, and Matthew Rabin, eds., Advances in Behavioral Economics, Princeton, Princeton University Press, Chapter 1.
 Conlisk, J. (1996). Why bounded rationality? Journal of Economic Literature, 34: 669-700.
 De Bondt, Werner F.M. and Thaler, R.H. (1985). Does the stock market overreact? The Journal of Finance, 40(3): 793-805.
 De Bondt, Werner F.M. and Thaler, R. H. (1987). Further evidence on investor overreaction and stock market seasonality, The Journal of Finance, 42(3): 557-581.
 Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4): 643–669.
 Fama, Eugene F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 35: 383-417.
 Fama, E. F. (1991). Efficient capital markets: II. Journal of Finance, 46(5): 1575-1617.
 Friedman, M. and Savage, L.J. (1948). Utility analysis of choices involving risk, Journal of Political Economy, 56(4): 279-304.
 Genesove, D. and Mayer, C. (2001). Loss aversion and seller behavior: evidence from the housing market, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4): 1233-1260.
 Gennaioli, N. and Shleifer, A. (2010). What comes to mind, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(4): 1399-1433.
 Gigerenzer, G. and Goldstein, D.G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality, Psychological Review, 103(4): 650–669.
 Gigerenzer, G. and Selten, R. (2001). Rethinking rationality. In Gigerenzer, Gerd and Reinhard Selten, eds., Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox, Cambridge (MA): MIT Press: 1-12.
 Gigerenzer, G. and Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: why biased minds make better inferences, Topics in Cognitive Science, (1): 107–143.
 Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., and Pachur, T. eds. (2011). Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
 Goldstein, D.G. and Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109: 75-90.
 Graziano, M. and Schiliro, D. (2011). Rationality and choices in economics: behavioral and evolutionary approaches, Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields, II(2): 183-196.
 Hogarth, R.M. and Reder M.W. (1986). Editor’s comment: perspectives from economics and psychology, Journal of Business, 59(4): S185-S207.
 Kahneman, D. (2002). Maps of bounded rationality: a perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. Prize Lecture, December 8, 2002, Princeton University: 449-489.
 Kahneman, D. (2003). A psychological perspective on economics, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 93(2): 162-168.
[27[ Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. and Thaler, R. H. (1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1): 193-206.
 Kahneman, D. and Thaler, R.H. (2006). Anomalies: utility maximization and experienced utility, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1): 221-234.
 Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: a judgment of representativeness, Cognitive Psychology, 3(3): 430–454.
 Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction, Psychological Review, 80: 237-252.
 Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory. An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47(2): 263-292.
 Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames, American Psychologist, 39: 341-350.
 Malkiel, Burton G. (2003). The efficient market hypothesis and its critics, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1): 59 – 82.
 Novarese, M., Castellani, M. and Di Giovinazzo, V. (2009). Procedural rationality and happiness, MPRA Paper 18290, University Library of Munich, Germany.
 Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? Journal of Finance, 53(5): 1775-1798.
 Odean, Terrance. (1999). Do investors trade too much? American Economic Review, 89 (5): 1279-1298.
 Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and economics, Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1):11-46.
 Rabin, M. (2002). Inference by believers in the law of small numbers, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117: 775–816.
 Rabin, M. (2002a). A perspective on psychology and economics, European Economic Review, 46(4-5): 657-685.
 Schilirò, D. (2012), Bounded rationality and perfect rationality: psychology into economics, Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields, III(2): 101-111.
 Shefrin, H. and Thaler, R.H. (1988). The behavioral life-cycle hypothesis, Economic Inquiry, 26(4): 609 - 643.
 Shiller, R. J. (2005). Behavioral economics and institutional innovation, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 1499.
 Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69 (1): 99-118.
 Simon, H.A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment, Psychological Review, 63(2): 129-138.
 Simon, H.A. (1957). Models of man, social and rational: mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
 Simon, H.A. (1959). Theories of decision making in economics and behavioral science, American Economic Review, 49(3): 253-283.
 Simon, H.A. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality, in McGuire C.B. and Roy Radner, eds., Decision and organization, Amsterdam, North Holland Pub.Co.
 Simon, H.A. (1976). From substantive to procedural rationality, in Latsis Spiru J., ed., Method and appraisal in economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 129-148.
 Simon, H.A. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations [Nobel Memorial Lecture], American Economic Review, 69(4): 493-513.
 Simon, H.A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality, Volume 2. Behavioral economics and business organization, Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
 Simon, H.A. (1997). Models of bounded rationality, Volume 3. Empirically grounded economic reason, Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
 Subrahmanyam, A. (2008). Behavioural finance: a review and synthesis, European Financial Management, 14(1): 12-29.
 Thaler, R.H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(1): 36-60.
 Thaler, R.H. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency, Economics Letters, 8: 201-207.
 Thaler, R.H. (1999). Mental accounting matters, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12:183-206.
 Thaler, R.H. (2003). Advances in Behavioral Finance II, New York, Russel Sage.
 Thaler, R.H. and Shefrin, H. (1981). An economic theory of self-control. Journal of Political Economy, 8(2): 392-406.
 Todd, P.M. and Gigerenzer, G. (2003). Bounding rationality to the world, Journal of Economic Psychology, 24: 143-165.
 Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability, Cognitive Psychology, 5(2): 207-232.
 Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, Science, 185: 1124-31, September.
 Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1981). The Framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Science, 211: 453–458.
 Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional vs. intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment, Psychological Review, 90(4): 293–315.
 Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions, Journal of Business, 59(4): S251-S278, October.
 Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behaviour, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.