CAN SHIFT TO A FUNDED PENSION SYSTEM AFFECT NATIONAL SAVING? THE CASE OF ICELAND

  • Mariangela BONASIA University of Naples, Parthenope, Italy
  • Oreste NAPOLITANO University of Naples, Parthenope, Italy

Abstract

Across industrialised and developing countries public pension systems have been heavily reformed during the last two decades. The major concern relates the financial sustainability of pay-as-you-go pension schemes. The proposals to privatize social security lead to the creation of a multipillar system. This study assesses the validity of the effect of pension reforms on domestic savings in two steps: first, to test for the existence of a long-run relationship, we use an ARDL model; second, we employ the Kalman filter algorithm, in order to recover the parameter dynamics overtime. We analyse the case of Iceland because its pension system is characterized by a large mandatory private pillar. The empirical evidence supports the widely held view that growing mandatory pension funds financial assets has significantly positive impact on national saving. Moreover, we show that the pattern of the pension funds’ coefficients seems to capture well the economic dynamic of the period. The coefficients of the funded pillars illustrate a shift upward soon after the launch of the reforms in 1998. Later on, these coefficients show a negative trend till the middle of 2004 and they increase sharply until the beginning of 2006. Afterwards, following the Icelandic and international financial crisis, they strongly declines.

References

[1] Arrau, P., and Schmidt-Hebbel, K. 1999. Pension System and Reforms – Countries Experiences and Research Issues, Policy Research Working Paper, n. 1470, The World Bank, June.
[2] Auerbach, A., and Kotlikoff, L. 1987. Dynamic Fiscal Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[3] Bahmani-Oskooee, M., and Chomsisengphet, S. 2002. Stability of M2 Money Demand Function in Industrial Countries. Applied Economics vol. 34(16): 2075-83.
[4] Bailliu, J., and Reisen, H. Do funded pensions contribute to higher aggregate saving? A cross country analysis. Working Paper no. 130, OECD Development Center.
[5] Brown, R.L., Durbin, J., and Evans, J.M., 1975. Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relations over time, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol.37:149-163.
[6] Cagan, P. The effect of Pension Plans on Aggregate Saving: Evidence from a Sample Survey, NBER, New York.
[7] Castellino, O., and Fornero, E. 1997. Privatizzare la previdenza sociale? Condizioni, modalità e limiti. Politica Economica vol. 13, iss. 1:3-25.
[8] Cesaratto, S. 2006. Transition to Fully Funded Pension Schemes: A Non-orthodox Criticism. Cambridge Journal of Economics vol. 30, n.1: 33-48.
[9] Cifuentes, R., and Valdes-Prieto, S. 1997. Transitions in the Presence of Credit Constraints. In: The economics of pensions: Principles, policies, and international experience, Cambridge University Press, 160-89; Cambridge; New York and Melbourne.
[10] Disney, R. 2000. Declining public pensions in an era of demographic ageing: will private provision fill the gap. European Economic Review 44: 957-73.
[11] Feldstein, M. 1974. Social Security, Induced Retirement and Aggregate Accumulation. Journal of Political Economy 82, n. 5; 905-926.
[12] Feldstein, M. 1996. The Missing Piece in Policy Analysis: Social Security Reform. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 1996; 86; 1-14.
[13] Granger, C.W.J. 1986. Developments in the study of cointegrated economic variables. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 48: 213-228.
[14] Granville, B., and Mallick, S. 2004. Fisher hypothesis: UK evidence over a century. Applied Economics Letters 11, 87-90.
[15] Gudmundsson, M., and Baldursdóttir, K. 2005. Pension funds – Future prospects and uncertainties. Monetary Bulletin, Central Bank of Iceland, 4.
[16] Gudmundsson, M. 2001. The Icelandic Pension System. National Association of Icelandic Pension Funds.
[17] Gudmundsson, M. 2004. The Icelandic pension system: Design and lessons for others. Monetary Bulletin, Central Bank of Iceland, 1.
[18] Hansen, B.E. 2002. Tests for Parameter Instability in Regressions with I(1) Processes. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association 20(1): 45-59.
[19] Hansen, H., and Johansen, S. 1993. Recursive estimation in cointegrated VAR models. Working Paper, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, University of Copenhagen 1993.
[20] Harvey, A. 1989. Forecasting structural time series models and Kalman filter. Cambridge University Press.
[21] Holzmann, R. 1997. Pension Reform, Financial Market Development, and Economic Growth: Preliminary Evidence from Chile. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers vol. 44, iss.2:149-78.
[22] Hviding, K., and Merette, M. 1998. Macroeconomic effects of pension reforms in the context of ageing populations: overlapping generations model simulation for seven OECD countries. OECD Working paper, 14.
[23] Katona, G. 1965. Private Pensions and Individual Saving. In Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
[24] Kotlikoff, L.J., Smetters, K.A., and Walliser, J. 1998. Social Security: Privatization and Progressivity. American Economic Review 88, iss. 2:137-41.
[25] Kotlikoff, L.J. 1996b. Simulating the Privatisation of Social Security in General Equilibrium. NBER Working Paper n.5776.
[26] Kotlikoff, L.J. 1996a. Privatising Social Security at home and abroad. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 86: 1-14.
[27] Masson, P.R., Bayoumi, T., and Samiei, H. 1998. International Evidence on the Determinants of Private Saving. World Bank Economic Review, Oxford University Press 12(3): 483-501.
[28] McKenzie, C. 1997. Unit Roots and Cointegration Analysis: The Impact on Empirical Analysis in Economics. Japanese Economic Review March: 18-28.
[29] Mitchell O.S, Zeldes S.P. Social Security Privatization: A structure for Analysis. American Economic Review 1996; vol.86, n.2; 363-367.
[30] Munnell, A. 1982. The Economics of Private Pensions. Washington, D.C., The Brookings Institution.
[31] Murphy, L.P., and Musalem, A.R. 2004. Pension funds and national saving. Policy Research Working Paper Series 3410, The World Bank.
[32] OECD. 2005. Pension Markets in Focus. OECD Newsletter, December 2005, Iss.1-2.
[33] Orszag, P.R., and Stiglitz, J.E. 2000. Rethinking Pension Reform: Ten Myths about social Security System. In: Holman R, Stiglitz J. New Ideas About Old Age Security, Washington, World Bank: 17-56.
[34] Pesaran, M.H., and Pesaran, B. 1997. Working with Microfit 4.0: Interactive Econometric Analysis. Oxford University Press.
[35] Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., and Smith, R.J. 2001. Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Levels Relationships, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Special Issue, in honor of JD Sargan on the theme “Studies in Empirical Macroeconomics”, (eds) D.F. Hedry and M.H. Pesaran 16: 289-326.
[36] Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., and Smith, R.J. 1999. An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Modeling Approach to Cointegration Analysis. In (ed) S. Strom. Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century. The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, Chapter 11, Cambridge University Press.
[37] Samwick, A. 2000. Is Pension Reform Conducive to Higher Saving. The Review of Economics and Statistics; 82(2): 264-272.
[38] World Bank. 1994. Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth. Washington DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press.
Published
2017-05-29
How to Cite
BONASIA, Mariangela; NAPOLITANO, Oreste. CAN SHIFT TO A FUNDED PENSION SYSTEM AFFECT NATIONAL SAVING? THE CASE OF ICELAND. Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 12-26, may 2017. ISSN 2068-7710. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/tpref/article/view/1092>. Date accessed: 17 may 2022.