• Stilianos ALEXIADIS University of Piraeus*, Greece Department of Economics


Although the importance of technology adoption has been acknowledged, nevertheless, at a more general level, a critical question arises: what is the implication of a ‘low’ or a ‘high’ adoptive ability for regional convergence? A model is developed in which the pattern of convergence is attributed to the rate of technological adoption across regions. According this model convergence towards leading regions is feasible only for regions with a sufficient ability to adopt technology. A scheme of measurement is developed to calibrate this argument and data for the EU27 NUTS-2 regions for period 1995-2006 are used to develop an empirical analysis of the processes and conditions that have been hypothesised as generating differential regional economic change. The results suggest that adoption of technology has a significant effect on regional growth patterns in Europe, and hence the analysis has important implications for the direction of regional policy in Europe.


[1] Abramovitz, M. 1986. Catching Up, Forging Ahead and Falling Behind. Journal of Economic History 46: 385-406.
[2] Alexiadis, S. 2010. Interregional Differences in Adoptive Abilities: An Alternative Framework. Forthcoming in Regional Science Inquire
[3] Bernard, A., and Jones, C. 1996. Technology and Convergence. Economic Journal 106: 1037-44.
[4] Barro, R., and Sala-i-Martin, X. 1992. Convergence. Journal of Political Economy 100: 223-51.
[5] Boldrin, M., and Canova, F. 2001. Inequality and Convergence in Europe’s Regions: Reconsidering European Regional Policies. Economic Policy. 16: 207-53.
[6] Borts, G., and Stein J. 1964. Economic Growth in a Free Market. Columbia University Press.
[7] Button, K., and Pentecost, E. 1995. Testing for Convergence of the EU Regional Economies. Economic Inquiry 33: 664-71.
[8] Durlauf, S., and Quah, D. 1999. The New Empirics of Economic Growth. In J. Taylor and M. Woodford (eds) Handbook of Macroeconomics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 235-308.
[9] Fischer, M., and Stirböck, C. 2006. Pan-European Regional Income Growth and Club-Convergence. Annals of Regional Science, 40: 693-721.
[10] Funke, M,. and Niebuhr, A. 2005. Regional Geographic Research and Development Spillovers and Economic Growth: Evidence from West Germany. Regional Studies 39: 143-53.
[11] Martin, R. 2001. EMU versus the Regions? Regional Convergence and Divergence in Euroland. Journal of Economic Geography 1: 51-80.
[12] Neven, D., and Gouyette, C. 1995. Regional Convergence in the European Community. Journal of Common Market Studies 33: 47-65.
[13] Pigliaru, F. 2003. Detecting Technological Catch-up in Economic Convergence. Metroeconomica 54: 161-78.
How to Cite
ALEXIADIS, Stilianos. THE NEXUS BETWEEN REGIONAL GROWTH AND TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION: A CASE FOR CLUB-CONVERGENCE?. Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 4-11, may 2017. ISSN 2068-7710. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 17 may 2022.