Legal Aspects of Biomedical Experiments on Humans in Russia

  • Sergey I. ZAKHARTSEV Institute of State and Law of The Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Viktor P. SALNIKOV Foundation for Support of Science and Education in the Field of Law Enforcement ‘University’, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation


The relevance of the study is determined by the fact that it is often a question of diversification of possible restrictions that become the basis of antagonism between the scientific progress and the desire of human beings to preserve themselves. Therefore, such fragments are often unpredictable, since the question of the admissibility of conducting research on humans has always been part of the general social and philosophical system that determines the development of society. The novelty of the study is that for the first time in the legal and philosophical literature the question of the conformity of what is called biological and medical ethics is raised in accordance with the national culture and national identity. The authors of the article clearly identify the inseparability of the connection between the cultural and statistical approach to the expediency of regulating biomedical experiments and their legal regulation. The structure of international legislation and its regional adaptation in Russian legislation are revealed. The practical significance of the study is determined by the possibility of forming a stable position regarding the possibilities of expanding the subject of legal regulation of biomedical ethics. Results: ‎The authors of the article determine that this is necessary for the complete improvement of the processes of socio-economic development, structural coordination of efforts aimed at achieving certain parameters and formation of a general picture regarding the holistic development of the ethical complex of a human being.



[1] Carmen, Aceijas. 2012. Teaching ethics in schools of public health in the European region: findings from a screening survey. Public Health Reviews 34(1): 10-18.
[2] Colleen, D. Clements. 1992. Systems ethics and the history of medical ethics. Psychiatric Quarterly 63(4): 367-390.
[3] Coppieters, Yves, and Alain Levêque 2013. Ethics, privacy and the legal framework governing medical data: opportunities or threats for biomedical and public health research? Archives of Public Health 71(1): 15-23.
[4] Coughlin, Steven S., Amyre Barker, and Angus Dawson 2012. Ethics and scientific integrity in public health, epidemiological and clinical research. Public Health Reviews 34(1): 5.
[5] Dawson, Angus, and Bruce Jennings 2012. The place of solidarity in public health ethics. Public Health Reviews 34(1): 4.
[6] Dive, Lisa. 2017. Globalization and the ethics of Transnational Biobank Networks. Asian Bioethics Review 9(4): 301-310.
[7] Federal Law No. 125-FZ 2012, July 20. On the donation of blood and its components. Retrieved from:
[8] Federal law No. 323-FZ 2011, November 21. On the basis of the protection of public health in the Russian Federation. Retrieved from:
[9] Franjić, Siniša. 2019. Ethical Debates about Cloning. Asploro Journal of Biomedical and Clinical Case Reports 2(3): 93-98.
[10] Hart, Curtis W. 1995. From innocence to experience: Teaching medical ethics to medical students. Journal of Religion and Health 34(1): 55-60. DOI:10.1007/bf02248638.
[11] Leshkevich, Tat’yana Gennad’yevna. 2006. Philosophy of science: training manual for post-graduate students and candidates for scientific degrees. Moscow: INFRA-M Press.
[12] Ma, Yonghui, Hua Chen, Ruipeng Lei, and Jianlin Ren. 2017. Biobanking for human microbiome research: promise, risks, and ethics. Asian Bioethics Review 9(4): 311-324.
[13] Miké, Valerie. 1992. Quality of life. Research and the ethics of evidence. Quality of Life Research 1(4): 273-276.
[14] Molewijk, A.C. et al. 2003. Implicit normativity in evidence-based medicine: a plea for integrated empirical ethics research. Health Care Analysis 11(1): 69-92.
[15] Munthe, Christian, Lars Sandman, and Daniela Cutas. 2012. Person centered care and shared decision making: implications for ethics, public Health and Research. Health Care Analysis 20(3): 231-249.
[16] Pickersgill, Martyn D. 2013. From `implications’ to `dimensions’: science, medicine and ethics in society. Health Care Analysis 21(1): 31-42.
[17] Potter, Christopher. 2015. Teaching public health ethics. Public Health Reviews 36(1): 12-19.
[18] Royo-Bordonada, Miguel Ángel, and Begoña Román-Maestre. 2015. Towards public health ethics. Public Health Reviews 36(1): 3-7.
[19] Russian Federation Law No. 4180-I 1992, December 22 "On transplantation of organs and (or) human tissues" (with amendments and additions). Retrieved from:
[20] Salnikov, Viktor Petrovich. 2006. Fundamentals of legal somatology, St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Press.
[21] Salnikov, Viktor Petrovich, Evgeniy Viktorovich Kuznetsov, and Ol’ga Eduardovna Starovoitova. 2002. Legal thanatology. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Press.
[22] Salnikov, Viktor Petrovich et al. 2003. Biomedical technology and law in the third millennium. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Press.
[23] Seedhouse, David. 1997. What’s the difference between health care ethics, medical ethics and nursing ethics? Health Care Analysis 5(4): 267-274.
[24] Taking Organ Transplantation to 2020. A detailed strategy. n/d. Retrieved from:
[25] Tulchinsky, Theodore, Bruce Jennings, and Sarah Viehbeck. 2015. Integrating ethics in public health education: the process of developing case studies. Public Health Reviews 36(1): 40-45.
[26] Wilson, Duncan. 2016. A troubled past? Reassessing ethics in the history of tissue culture. Health Care Analysis 24(3): 246-259.
How to Cite
ZAKHARTSEV, Sergey I.; SALNIKOV, Viktor P.. Legal Aspects of Biomedical Experiments on Humans in Russia. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 7, p. 2182 – 2189, dec. 2019. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 03 oct. 2023. doi: