Legal Aspects of Biomedical Experiments on Humans in Russia
Abstract
The relevance of the study is determined by the fact that it is often a question of diversification of possible restrictions that become the basis of antagonism between the scientific progress and the desire of human beings to preserve themselves. Therefore, such fragments are often unpredictable, since the question of the admissibility of conducting research on humans has always been part of the general social and philosophical system that determines the development of society. The novelty of the study is that for the first time in the legal and philosophical literature the question of the conformity of what is called biological and medical ethics is raised in accordance with the national culture and national identity. The authors of the article clearly identify the inseparability of the connection between the cultural and statistical approach to the expediency of regulating biomedical experiments and their legal regulation. The structure of international legislation and its regional adaptation in Russian legislation are revealed. The practical significance of the study is determined by the possibility of forming a stable position regarding the possibilities of expanding the subject of legal regulation of biomedical ethics. Results: The authors of the article determine that this is necessary for the complete improvement of the processes of socio-economic development, structural coordination of efforts aimed at achieving certain parameters and formation of a general picture regarding the holistic development of the ethical complex of a human being.
References
[2] Colleen, D. Clements. 1992. Systems ethics and the history of medical ethics. Psychiatric Quarterly 63(4): 367-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066764.
[3] Coppieters, Yves, and Alain Levêque 2013. Ethics, privacy and the legal framework governing medical data: opportunities or threats for biomedical and public health research? Archives of Public Health 71(1): 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/0778-7367-71-15.
[4] Coughlin, Steven S., Amyre Barker, and Angus Dawson 2012. Ethics and scientific integrity in public health, epidemiological and clinical research. Public Health Reviews 34(1): 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391657.
[5] Dawson, Angus, and Bruce Jennings 2012. The place of solidarity in public health ethics. Public Health Reviews 34(1): 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391656.
[6] Dive, Lisa. 2017. Globalization and the ethics of Transnational Biobank Networks. Asian Bioethics Review 9(4): 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-017-0034-8.
[7] Federal Law No. 125-FZ 2012, July 20. On the donation of blood and its components. Retrieved from: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_132904/.
[8] Federal law No. 323-FZ 2011, November 21. On the basis of the protection of public health in the Russian Federation. Retrieved from: https://rg.ru/2011/11/23/zdorovie-dok.html.
[9] Franjić, Siniša. 2019. Ethical Debates about Cloning. Asploro Journal of Biomedical and Clinical Case Reports 2(3): 93-98. https://doi.org/10.36502/2019/ASJBCCR.6168.
[10] Hart, Curtis W. 1995. From innocence to experience: Teaching medical ethics to medical students. Journal of Religion and Health 34(1): 55-60. DOI:10.1007/bf02248638.
[11] Leshkevich, Tat’yana Gennad’yevna. 2006. Philosophy of science: training manual for post-graduate students and candidates for scientific degrees. Moscow: INFRA-M Press.
[12] Ma, Yonghui, Hua Chen, Ruipeng Lei, and Jianlin Ren. 2017. Biobanking for human microbiome research: promise, risks, and ethics. Asian Bioethics Review 9(4): 311-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-017-0033-9.
[13] Miké, Valerie. 1992. Quality of life. Research and the ethics of evidence. Quality of Life Research 1(4): 273-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435637.
[14] Molewijk, A.C. et al. 2003. Implicit normativity in evidence-based medicine: a plea for integrated empirical ethics research. Health Care Analysis 11(1): 69-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025390030467.
[15] Munthe, Christian, Lars Sandman, and Daniela Cutas. 2012. Person centered care and shared decision making: implications for ethics, public Health and Research. Health Care Analysis 20(3): 231-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-011-0183-y.
[16] Pickersgill, Martyn D. 2013. From `implications’ to `dimensions’: science, medicine and ethics in society. Health Care Analysis 21(1): 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-012-0219-y.
[17] Potter, Christopher. 2015. Teaching public health ethics. Public Health Reviews 36(1): 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-015-0007-y.
[18] Royo-Bordonada, Miguel Ángel, and Begoña Román-Maestre. 2015. Towards public health ethics. Public Health Reviews 36(1): 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-015-0005-0.
[19] Russian Federation Law No. 4180-I 1992, December 22 "On transplantation of organs and (or) human tissues" (with amendments and additions). Retrieved from: http://base.garant.ru/136366/.
[20] Salnikov, Viktor Petrovich. 2006. Fundamentals of legal somatology, St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Press.
[21] Salnikov, Viktor Petrovich, Evgeniy Viktorovich Kuznetsov, and Ol’ga Eduardovna Starovoitova. 2002. Legal thanatology. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Press.
[22] Salnikov, Viktor Petrovich et al. 2003. Biomedical technology and law in the third millennium. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Press.
[23] Seedhouse, David. 1997. What’s the difference between health care ethics, medical ethics and nursing ethics? Health Care Analysis 5(4): 267-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678524.
[24] Taking Organ Transplantation to 2020. A detailed strategy. n/d. Retrieved from: https://nhsbtdbe.blob.core.windows.net/umbraco-assets-corp/1395/nhsbt_organ_donor_strategy.pdf.
[25] Tulchinsky, Theodore, Bruce Jennings, and Sarah Viehbeck. 2015. Integrating ethics in public health education: the process of developing case studies. Public Health Reviews 36(1): 40-45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-015-0002-3.
[26] Wilson, Duncan. 2016. A troubled past? Reassessing ethics in the history of tissue culture. Health Care Analysis 24(3): 246-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-015-0304-0.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.