Responsibility of a Host State in Transnational Investment Disputes

  • Valeriy Nikolayevich LISITSA Novosibirsk State University, Russian Federation Siberian Federal University, Russian Federation Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management, Russian Federation

Abstract

The article seeks to define the legal nature of the responsibility of a host state in transnational investment disputes. It considers numerous rules (treaties, national law, customs, soft law, etc.) and their application within a domestic legal system to ensure the proper implementation of civil and other legal rights and obligations of host states and foreign investors. It is argued that the involvement of foreign investors and host states in international commercial arbitration, including the ICSID, and the application of international law (along with national law) as a legal ground for the payment of compensation, do not change the nature of the existing legal relationship between the parties of the investment dispute. The responsibility of the host state to the foreign investor expressed in the state’s obligation to pay damages (compensation) remains in the private, rather than international public law sphere. In conditions of lack of proper rules of investment law states should not stand aside from the present process of making such rules by non-state actors. This situation detracts from the treaty as a major source of international law, sometimes does not correspond to the interests of host states and moreover may threaten their sovereignty.

References

[1] Lukashenka, I.I. 2008. Mezhdunarodnoye Pravo [International Law]. Moscow.
[2] Velyaminov, G.M. 2004. Mezhdunarodnoye Ekonomicheskoye Pravo i Protsess [International Economic Law and Procedure]. Moscow.
[3] Convention on Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States. 1965. Available at https://icsid.worldbank.org/en/Documents/icsiddocs/ICSID%20Convention%20English.pdf (accessed 20 December 2017).
[4] Energy Charter Treaty. 1994. Available at http://www.ena.lt/pdfai/Treaty.pdf (accessed 20 December 2017).
[5] Seoul Convention Establishing the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. 1985. Available at https://www.miga.org/Documents/MIGA%20Convention%20February%202016.pdf (accessed 20 December 2017).
[6] Sella, P. 1973. Dealing with Investment Problems: the World Bank and the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, International Control of Investment. N.Y.; Washington; L., Available at http://www.miga.org/ (accessed 20 December 2017).
[7] Suleimenov, M.K. 2006. Pravovoye Regulirovaniye Inostrannykh Investitsii i Nedropolzovaniya v Kazakhstane [The Legal Regulation of Foreign Investments and Subsoil Using in Kazakhstan]. Almaty.
[8] Treaty on Eurasian Economic Union. 2014. Available at https://docs.eaeunion.org/ru-ru/Pages/DisplayDocument.aspx?s=bef9c798-3978-42f3-9ef2-d0fb3d53b75f&w=632c7868-4ee2-4b21-bc64-1995328e6ef3&l=540294ae-c3c9-4511-9bf8-aaf5d6e0d169&EntityID=3610 (accessed 20 December 2017).
[9] Federal Law of 25 February 1999 No 39-FZ ‘On Investment Activities in the Russian Federation in the Form of Capital Investmentsʼ. Available at http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_22142/ (accessed 20 December 2017).
[10] Federal Law of 9 July 9 1999 No 160-FZ ‘On Foreign Investments in the Russian Federationʼ. Available at http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_16283/ (accessed 20 December 2017).
[11] Federal Law of 21 July 2005 No 115-FZ ‘On Concession Agreementsʼ. Available at http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_54572/ (accessed 20 December 2017).
[12] Federal Law of 13 July 2015 No 224-FZ ‘On Public-Private Partnership, Municipal-Private Partnership in the Russian Federation and the Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federationʼ. Available at http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_182660/ (accessed 20 December 2017).
[13] Salini Costruttori S.P.A. and Italstrade S.P.A. v. the Kingdom of Morocco (ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4). Available at http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0738.pdf (accessed 20 December 2017).
[14] Saipem S.p.A v. the People’s Republic of Bangladesh (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/07). Available at http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0734.pdf (accessed 20 December 2017).
[15] Civil Code of the Russian Federation. 1994. Available at http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_5142 (accessed 20 December 2017).
[16] Anglo-Iranian Oil Company Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. Case. Available at http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/idecisions/isummaries/iukisummery520722.htm (accessed 20 December 2017).
[17] SGS Société Générale de Surveillance S.A. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13). Available at http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0779.pdf (accessed 20 December 2017).
[18] Schreuer, C.H. 2001. The ICSID Convention: A Commentary. Cambridge.
[19] Peter, W. 1995. Arbitration and Renegotiation of International Investment Agreements. The Hague; Boston; L.
[20] Hober, K. 2007. Otvetstvennost Gosudarstva i Investitsionnyi Arbitrazh [Responsibilty of State and Investment Arbitration]. International Commercial Arbitration, 3.
[21] Voznesenskaya, N.N. 2011. Pravovoye Regulirovaniye i Zaschita Inostrannykh Investitsii v Rossii [The Legal Regulation and Protection of Foreign Investments in Russia]. Moscow.
[22] Hofmann, M. 2012. Vzaimodeistviye Prava Inostrannykh Investitsii i Mezhdunarodhogo Ekologicheskogo Prava [Correlation of Law on Foreign Investments and International Ecological Law], Sootnosheniye Prava Inostrannykh Investitsii i Ekologicheskogo Prava [Correlation of Law on Foreign Investments and Ecological Law]. Moscow.
[23] Bogatyrev, A.G. 1992. Investitsionnoye Pravo [Investment Law]. Moscow.
[24] AMCO Asia Corporation, Pan American Development Limited and PT AMCO Indonesia v. the Republic of Indonesia (ICSID Case No. ARB/81/1). 1992. International Law Reports 89: 336–661.
[25] Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. & Compagnie Générale des Eaux v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/97/3). 2001. ICSID Review — Foreign Investment Law Journal 16: 641–681.
[26] Metalclad Corporation v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No ARB (AF)/97/1). 2001. ICSID Review — Foreign Investment Law Journal 16: 1–35.
[27] Federal Law of 6 October 1999 No 184-FZ ‘On the General Principles of the Organization of Legislative (Representative) and Executive Bodies of State Power of the Subjects of the Russian Federationʼ. Available at http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_14058/ (accessed 20 December 2017).
[28] Federal Law of 6 October 2003 No 131-FZ ‘On the General Principles of the Organization of Local Government in the Russian Federationʼ. Available at http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_44571/ (accessed 20 December 2017).
Published
2018-09-22
How to Cite
LISITSA, Valeriy Nikolayevich. Responsibility of a Host State in Transnational Investment Disputes. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 139-146, sep. 2018. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/2296>. Date accessed: 23 sep. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.1(31).18.