Continental Dimensions of Sports Law and Governance

  • Riya Gulati LL.M (Intellectual Property and Information Technology) University College Dublin, Ireland, and + BA.LLB, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University, Pune, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8060-774X

Abstract

As sports have developed into a globalized industry characterized by international competitions, substantial financial investments, and extensive media and commercial interests, effective governance mechanisms have become crucial. This paper examines how different continental jurisdictions regulate and govern sport in order to promote transparency, ethical practices, fair competition, institutional accountability, and protection of stakeholders’ rights. The research adopts a comparative legal and governance-based approach, examining regulatory models across selected jurisdictions. The analysis reveals that harmonization of governance standards remains a key challenge in global sport, particularly where national legal systems intersect with international sports regulations. The study emphasizes the need for more coherent and collaborative governance approaches that can mitigate regulatory fragmentation whilst safeguarding the institutional autonomy fundamental to international sporting bodies. The primary objective is to conduct a comparative analysis of sports law across continents, identifying variations in scope.  The continental dimensions of sports law and governance reveal a distinct yet interconnected legal system in which sporting governance structures, media and broadcasting rights, match-fixing controls, safeguarding obligations, employment relations, human rights standards, dispute resolution mechanisms, stadium safety, intellectual property regimes, integrity frameworks, sports agency representation, private investment, sponsorship and commercialization, anti-doping regulation, and liability for sports injuries must be coherently integrated to ensure that sport remains ethically governed, commercially viable, and legally sustainable across diverse jurisdictions.

References

COE. (n.d.). The European Sports Charter. Council of Europe.
CoE. (n.d.). The Anti-Doping Convention: an instrument of international co-operation. Council of Europe. < https://www.coe.int/en/web/sport/anti-doping-convention>
Conseil de l’Europe. (2023). Implementation of anti-doping policies in 2023- Australia. ADQ Report.
Council of Europe. (n.d.). European Sports Charter. Council of Europe.
Council Of Europe. (n.d.). Anti-Doping Convention. Council of Europe.
Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts. (2021, November 04). Sports Integrity Australia Act 2020. Federal Register of Legislation.
Doubell, L-M., et al. (2024, August 19). Chasing fair play: South Africa’s bold leap with new anti-doping legislation. Webber Wentzel.
Etna, D.A., et al. (2025). United States: Sports Law. Legal500.
European Commission. (2025, October 3). The European sport model. European Commission.
Fit Lawyers. (n.d.). What is sports law?
Foster, K. (2003). Is There a Global Sports Law? Entertainment and Sports Law Journal, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.16997/eslj.146
Holland and Knight LLP. (n.d.). Sports law. Holland and Knight. < https://www.hklaw.com/en/services/practices/litigation-and-dispute-resolution/sports-law>
Igarashi, A., et al. (2025, March 27). Sports Law- Japan. Chambers and Partners.
Kamenecka-Usova, M., et al. (2025). Research patterns in sports law and sports governance: A Scopus bibliometric study. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 1. <10.3389/fspor.2025.1590858>
Keller, C., and Wiki, M. (2025, August 8). Sports Law: Global Overview. Lexology. < https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=b84012f4-968e-426d-8f48-e429b6be5370>
Kishner, I.A., et al. (2025, March 11). Sports Law 2025: USA. Chambers and Partners.
Lloyd, A. (2023, September 8). In review: sports governance and dispute resolution in New Zealand. Lexology.
Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports. (2026, January 12). Notification of National Sports Governance (National Sports Bodies) Rules, 2026. Press Information Bureau, Government of India. < https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2213803andreg=3andlang=2>
Nascimento Turano, A., and Mariotto, C. (2019, October 16). Sports law in Brazil. Lexology.
Nafziger, J.A.R. (2004). China’s Sports Law. International Sports Law, 333-334.
Office of the Auditor-General. (2010). Sport and Recreation New Zealand: Improving how it measures its performance- Appendix: Functions under the Sport and Recreation New Zealand Act 2002.
Palazzi, P.A. (2023, September 8). In review: sports governance and dispute resolution in Argentina. Lexology.
Republic of South Africa. (1998). National Sport and Recreation Act, 1998. DSAC.
Scott, I., and Jarret, D. (n.d.). Legal Landscapes: Japan- Sports Law. Legal 500.
Singer, J., and Chambers, N. (2025, August 6). A general introduction to sports law in United Kingdom (England and Wales). Lexology.
Soubliere, J. (2025, March 27). Sports Law 2025: Canada. Chambers and Partners.
The National Anti Doping Act, 2022, No. 15 of 2022. < https://prsindia.org/files/bills_acts/acts_parliament/2022/The%20National%20Anti%20Doping%20Act%202022.pdf>
The National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China. (2022, June 24). Law of the People’s Republic of China on Sports. NPC
Published
2026-03-31
How to Cite
GULATI, Riya. Continental Dimensions of Sports Law and Governance. Journal of Advanced Research in Sports: Interdisciplinary Approach, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 20 - 30, mar. 2026. ISSN 3120-2543. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarsia/article/view/9421>. Date accessed: 27 apr. 2026.